sdgillis wrote:
No I think you do, you're extremely rude to anyone's response and I expect no less. It's that attitude that is setting you apart from artists models WANT to work with.
The rates for life models has always been lower for life drawing and painting. Always. The reason for that is actually simple. Commercial images. An artist can't pump out a set for sites like Zivinity, stock photography, or a set for an "art" site that makes money reselling the image license. The arts aren't considered selling your image to resell product. Even I pay photography rates if I'm using the images for my own stock library to draw from. I know I won't be hiring the model over a month's period, and I can manage the image without concern for lens distortion.
Now you consider yourself a photographer "artist" instead of a commercial one. Well, if you want to work with people at artists rates, you're going to have to be nice, famous, or desirable... just like a popular model...
It works both ways; I've turned down many many models who wanted photography rates for life modeling - generally because they have higher paying offers.
I've only skimmed through this thread and yeah what they said ^^^
I'm probably off topic since I didn't read most of it but here's my 2¢
Maybe it's the lack of voice infliction in OP's words and maybe I just don't understand his view point but the way he's coming across to me personality wise I simply wouldn't want to work with him and would probably quote an outrageous rate if he approached me with the attitude displayed in his posts on this thread.
I'm a negotiator with most things and I understand that life is a struggle for some but if someone rubs me the wrong way I will walk away simply because I don't like working rude or whiny people. People who are polite and generally fun to be around are who I choose to work with again and again regardless of the budget.