roger alan wrote:
I don't like seeing the bottom of that boot resting on the hood of the car. Could easily damage the  (I would assume)  meticulous paint job. And for what? That image above is not very sexy IMO.

That's what I was thinking about the boots.

Paolo Diavolo wrote:
Cool idea. Except Toyota and Kia. wtf? thats lame. Its easy to stereotype car brand owners.

They don't have any of my three cars' brands tho

Her idea is not to portray the owners, but portray cars in anthropomorphic manner.
Well...Toyota and Kia would probably look like that if they were girls..

So, Bentley, Koenigsegg and Auburn are not in the list....sadly...

MoRina wrote:
Nice headlights.

Which manufacturer in particular?..

R.EYE.R wrote:

Her idea is not to portray the owners, but portray cars in anthropomorphic manner.
Well...Toyota and Kia would probably look like that if they were girls..

So, Bentley, Koenigsegg and Auburn are not in the list....sadly...

I really like the idea.

Unfortunately, it's a flawed idea. The only people that will be interested (beyond looking at pretty girls) are car fans, and they'll notice right away that the logic is all sorts of screwed up. Rolls Royce may very well be a classic and elegant car that is still over-the-top sexy, but those aren't the people that buy them. Ditto for Hummer and the 64 Impala. People that own 64 Impalas aren't young, good-looking punks - they're investors and old guys that owned one fifty years ago, or wanted one thirty years ago. Even when it was affordable to punks, it wasn't a punk car - a Rockabilly chick would have been a lot more appropriate, or even someone that looks like a Stones groupie.

I thought Chevy was the only one that was bang on. But to be honest, that's the easiest one.

Oh, and the Mercedes one was really, really close. Needs less Caligula Meryl Streep, more Devil Wears Prada Streep.

I think it's a fantastic idea. Unfortunately, it's a fantastic idea for a demographic that won't appreciate anything less than perfect choices.

Zack Zoll wrote:
I think it's a fantastic idea. Unfortunately, it's a fantastic idea for a demographic that won't appreciate anything less than perfect choices.

Welcome to Russia..

Eyesso wrote:
1994 Ford Pick Up Truck 

I loled!
You take requests? How about Messerschmitt KR200?

R.EYE.R wrote:

I loled!
You take requests? How about Messerschmitt KR200?

Same guy.

Different moustache.

Zack Zoll wrote:
Same guy.

Different moustache.

My interpretation would be probably:

R.EYE.R wrote:
Her idea is not to portray the owners, but portray cars in anthropomorphic manner.
Well...Toyota and Kia would probably look like that if they were girls..

they specified the manufacturer models; camry and optima.
those are some basic bitch cars;
affordable, uninspiring, utilitarian, low cost of ownership, good gas mileage, dependable family cars.

the human version needs to be a loving house wife. average looking in everyway,  who doesn't have a sex drive and never forgets to pack the kids lunch.

booooooring!

they shoulda done a Prius and just had a model who likes to smell her own farts.

Paolo Diavolo wrote:
they shoulda done a Prius and just had a model who likes to smell her own farts.

That would be refreshingly interesting...

roger alan wrote:
I don't like seeing the bottom of that boot resting on the hood of the car. Could easily damage the  (I would assume)  meticulous paint job. And for what? That image above is not very sexy IMO.

To each his own Mr. R  .  .  .  as to da paint, far from meticulous, Miss B's boot only moved da dirt around a bit  .  .  .    Now, back to the OP's point  .  .  .

SOS

Maxximages wrote:

That's what I was thinking about the boots.

Miss B was very gentle, and O'l Yellar is a tough old bird  .  .  . 

SOS

sospix wrote:

To each his own Mr. R  .  .  .  as to da paint, far from meticulous, Miss B's boot only moved da dirt around a bit  .  .  .    Now, back to the OP's point  .  .  .

SOS

Sincere apologies SOS. I mistakenly assumed the pic you posted was from the site linked in the OP.