Forums > Critique > Just uploaded some new professional pictures!

Makeup Artist

beautybykatealece

Posts: 41

Sacramento, California, US

The two with the blonde girl! Was wondering from all of you photographers if the pictures are good quality for my portfolio. I know they're better than the snapshots I mostly have, but if you saw those pictures, what would your first immediate thought be? Would you think the makeup looked clean, etc etc *I have permission from the photographer to post!

Apr 25 16 11:07 am Link

Photographer

Mark Salo

Posts: 11727

Olney, Maryland, US

I like your avatar better.

ETA: The two new ones seem overexposed and washed out on my monitor.

Apr 25 16 11:22 am Link

Photographer

Lee_Photography

Posts: 9863

Minneapolis, Minnesota, US

https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/160425/10/571e5903e58d5_m.jpg
Never been a fan of blasting the camera with the whites of the eyes, like looking for UFOs

https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/160425/10/571e57bf706cb_m.jpg
I see a variation in skin color between the upper chest area and the models face

https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/160405/22/57049ff3058f5_m.jpg
Watch your backgrounds, see how busy this one is?
Harsh sunlight might not be the best lighting for displaying your makeup

https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/160105/07/568be79e8ffa5_m.jpg
Like the last image of the set, but do you see how busy the background is, is the smoothing that was done in this photo by you or Photoshop?

I believe you need to showcase your work better

I wish you well

Apr 25 16 11:58 am Link

Photographer

Orca Bay Images

Posts: 33877

Arcata, California, US

beautybykatealece wrote:
but if you saw those pictures, what would your first immediate thought be?

My first impression would be that those aren't professional shots. Badly exposed and the color is off. I hope you didn't pay anyone for those.

Apr 25 16 06:27 pm Link

Photographer

Aaron Lewis Photography

Posts: 5217

Catskill, New York, US

I agree, not impressed. As a makeup artist, none of those images are helping your cause.

Apr 25 16 08:57 pm Link

Photographer

thiswayup

Posts: 1136

Runcorn, England, United Kingdom

I think a lot of these shots show that you can do very good work. But I hope you didn't pay the photographer much to take them. Aside from the colour problem already pointed out, what am I supposed to conclude from this shot

https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/160425/10/571e57bf706cb_m.jpg

That exposure technique is a great way of making models look good *without* a mua because it blows the details of the face that a mua is supposed to fix. Beauty shows need skin detail, not its absence. Otoh this isn't a problem in those of your shots where you changed the very shape of this face - something you seem very good at. I'd want to work with you if you were near me!

You really need to look for a photographer who can deliver skin detail. A ringflash isn't the only way to do these type of shots, but it's a good start. And imo shots that need to show the face in the detail you need should be take with a +200mm equivalent lens to get the right distance for perspective - so ask whether people have those items before doing tfp. If someone doesn't have a ringflash but has a good alternative lighting strategy and shots to back it up, that's fine.

Apr 27 16 10:43 am Link