I would welcome serious and constructive criticism of my work - my overall photographic style, technique and abilities.

Thanks
The Last Frame NZ

My reply will probably be the least useful one you get. My perspective is that of someone who has been shooting a very short time and has been looking at classic work like crazy. Like most of what I say here, half my reason for saying it is to see how I might be wrong.

You're technically competent, know how to compose a shot and pose a model, and your style is such that like or dislike is mostly a matter of personal taste for that style. The one semi-objective negative reaction I have is that - based on the very small sample of shots here - you don't have a larger range of mood or composition. It's like you're taking the same platonic image over and over again most of the time, adapting - skillfully! - to opportunities in the background.

Of course, that's a criticism you could make of some very successful photographers, and when it's the biggest criticism someone imagine making of your work - even when it doesn't resonate with them personally - then it means you're good.