|
Forums >
General Industry >
Would you post a notice of MMer who flakes on you?
PHP-Photography wrote: Yup. It wasn't locked when I linked it. They haven't locked this thread yet or hidden the posts that mention other sites. You could back up your comment within the rules. You could attempt to make logical arguments as to why I am wrong, but you limit yourself to one line snark replies. No facts. No logic. No references. Jul 15 19 08:52 am Link Hunter GWPB wrote: Advertising Competing Services Jul 15 19 09:37 am Link Very good! You can copy and paste the rules! Now read them. Your interpretation indicates you have not read them. Discussing the advantages or pitfalls is not advertising, especially on a narrow topic. Telling me one site that has met the absurd criteria in the other post, is not telling someone to sign up. This isn't even about making a statement that site "Q" is better than MM. It is about your claim: "Yet it works very well on other sites." Plural. You can't name one that has a review system that works very well because there isn't one. I have no doubt that if there was even a modicum of you being right, you would do anything you could to shut me up. Even if we leave out the jurisdiction issues, even if we leave out the parts about the site being the de-facto broker for the shoots, list one that has a review system that will work well. They will never work well because they will all depend on he said, she said. Some facts might be verifiable like those written in an email. (MM can and does act on such things.) Otherwise, many claims will be either perspective or bogus. And someone that wasn't there is going to have to make a decision about credibility and people will be unjustly screwed. Is that what you define as working very well? Read the rules rules again. Note that there is an exclusion listed. Then note that there is an example of permitted behavior. Your claim that it is against the rules to back up your previous falsehood is erroneous and concocted. Please note, the thread I linked was locked. It was not hidden. The information in that post is still there. It is a thread that started in 2010. Still there. They lock 'em because they get old, too. The posters are probably gone. The data may no longer be valid. Maybe, because I mentioned it, they will hide the thread. And then you can give me more snark and tell me they hid it. Oh well. You will still be wrong that "it works very well on other sites." Jul 15 19 10:13 am Link Hunter GWPB wrote: Just bc you are not aware of other sites outside US does not mean they don't exist. Jul 16 19 12:25 am Link PHP-Photography wrote: Name them. Damn man. Such a simple thing to do and you just won't back yourself up. Jul 16 19 03:34 am Link Hunter GWPB wrote: Jul 16 19 03:49 am Link PHP-Photography wrote: Your credibility is shot. Jul 16 19 04:43 am Link Hunter GWPB wrote: I'm not going to risk a ban just bc you can't search. Jul 16 19 05:00 am Link |
