Forums > Critique > Fun and Games > Does the person above you have the 'it' factor?

Model

Lucillian

Posts: 428

Cincinnati, Ohio, US

ciaranwhyte wrote:
I certainly think so.

Dec 10 13 11:27 pm Link

Photographer

Camerosity

Posts: 5805

Saint Louis, Missouri, US

Lucillian wrote:

Yes!

Dec 10 13 11:37 pm Link

Model

Tiger-Lilly

Posts: 49

East Haven, Connecticut, US

Most definitely

Dec 11 13 05:02 pm Link

Photographer

Rik Williams

Posts: 4005

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

No I'm afraid not

Dec 13 13 01:35 pm Link

Photographer

Camerosity

Posts: 5805

Saint Louis, Missouri, US

Rik Williams wrote:
No I'm afraid not

Yep. One of my favorite photographers on MM.

Dec 14 13 01:40 am Link

Model

Celine Sophia

Posts: 503

Santa Barbara, California, US

Hell yea!!

Dec 22 13 09:05 am Link

Model

Beth Chambers

Posts: 465

London, England, United Kingdom

Yeah smile

Dec 23 13 02:25 pm Link

Model

Alicia Evans

Posts: 20

London, England, United Kingdom

not really, but you have some great work in your portfolio

Dec 23 13 03:52 pm Link

Photographer

Camerosity

Posts: 5805

Saint Louis, Missouri, US

Alicia Evans wrote:

Not yet, but I see a lot of potential. You have an uncommon and potentially very versatile look, as well as a good height. The photography in your portfolio isn't awful, but it isn't great either. I don't believe it shows everything that you have to offer. You need to work on your posing *and* expressions. Doing that and working with better photographers could do wonders for your portfolio.

Dec 23 13 05:58 pm Link

Model

Angie Marie

Posts: 129

Portland, Oregon, US

definitely

Dec 24 13 11:31 am Link

Photographer

HO Photo

Posts: 575

Los Angeles, California, US

Cute look and some cool shots, but I think that elusive "it" factor is not quite there.

Dec 24 13 01:17 pm Link

Model

Beth Chambers

Posts: 465

London, England, United Kingdom

Almost!

Dec 31 13 07:16 am Link

Model

Laragh

Posts: 1395

Baltimore, Maryland, US

Super gorgeous and you have a good look, I just think a bit more presence would give you that "it" factor.

Dec 31 13 09:51 pm Link

Photographer

Geoff Jones

Posts: 1573

Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

No, but I have high standards.

Dec 31 13 10:20 pm Link

Model

Not interested

Posts: 75

Allison, Iowa, US

more that definitely!

Jan 01 14 11:07 am Link

Model

SeaStar

Posts: 37

San Diego, California, US

Elementum wrote:
more that definitely!

You have lovely facial features but all your images are nothing more than selfies so I cannot even tell how you would perform as a model

Jan 01 14 11:13 am Link

Model

Beth Chambers

Posts: 465

London, England, United Kingdom

Not yet, although I appreciate the artistic value of your shots. I don't think your portfolio fully shows what you have to offer

Jan 03 14 01:13 pm Link

Model

Headykay

Posts: 32

Des Moines, Iowa, US

Beth Chambers wrote:
Not yet, although I appreciate the artistic value of your shots. I don't think your portfolio fully shows what you have to offer

Absolutely

Jan 05 14 05:30 pm Link

Model

Celine Sophia

Posts: 503

Santa Barbara, California, US

Sorry but no

Jan 09 14 01:18 am Link

Photographer

Rik Williams

Posts: 4005

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Celine Sophia wrote:
Sorry but no

Indeed

Jan 09 14 07:16 am Link

Model

Shirin Brigitte

Posts: 379

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

I am following your work.
Means yes.

Jan 11 14 09:06 am Link

Model

Beth Chambers

Posts: 465

London, England, United Kingdom

Yes you do!

Jan 14 14 11:41 am Link

Photographer

HO Photo

Posts: 575

Los Angeles, California, US

While I think you are lovely,  your port doesn't convey that "it" factor for me.

Jan 16 14 03:19 pm Link

Model

2960427

Posts: 148

s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands

Absolutely

Jan 19 14 10:54 am Link

Model

May_Bee

Posts: 226

Basel, Basel-Town, Switzerland

MonkeyL wrote:
Absolutely

You are beautiful, you definitely have "it" factor, but please get rid of your avatar! I don't like it at all, sorry

Jan 20 14 01:04 pm Link

Photographer

fine art nudes by paul

Posts: 3296

Oakland, California, US

@ may bee

if you were closer I'd totally work with you, so yes.

Jan 20 14 01:26 pm Link

Photographer

The Sweaty Sock

Posts: 470

Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom

double negative wrote:

No. Not for me.

Jan 20 14 01:40 pm Link

Model

Ann77

Posts: 175

Atlanta, Georgia, US

G-O-R-D-O-N  wrote:

No. Not for me.

Yes!  Love Hollywood Glam!  smile

Jan 20 14 02:36 pm Link

Model

Celine Sophia

Posts: 503

Santa Barbara, California, US

Yes she does!

Jan 21 14 01:39 pm Link

Model

Beth Chambers

Posts: 465

London, England, United Kingdom

Not yet but you are getting there!

Jan 26 14 02:40 am Link

Photographer

x n y

Posts: 845

Miami, Florida, US

Yes.

Jan 26 14 03:32 pm Link

Body Painter

Tim Gratton

Posts: 1054

Dubbo, New South Wales, Australia

Yes...smile

Jan 30 14 06:12 am Link

Model

Elesha Eden

Posts: 588

London, England, United Kingdom

Oh yeah smile x

Jan 30 14 07:17 am Link

Photographer

Garage Photography

Posts: 273

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Ya, you soooo totally got "it".

Jan 30 14 07:29 am Link

Model

Beth Chambers

Posts: 465

London, England, United Kingdom

Not for me, sorry

Feb 06 14 04:47 am Link

Photographer

CBP STL

Posts: 473

Saint Louis, Missouri, US

There something there. Yes.

Feb 06 14 10:41 am Link

Body Painter

Tim Gratton

Posts: 1054

Dubbo, New South Wales, Australia

Yes.... next time I'm in the US

Feb 11 14 10:14 pm Link

Model

Pauline Yee

Posts: 406

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

I think your work it great! I am not sure what the 'it' factor is though

Feb 12 14 01:05 am Link

Body Painter

Tim Gratton

Posts: 1054

Dubbo, New South Wales, Australia

Pauline Yee wrote:
I think your work it great! I am not sure what the 'it' factor is though

With you it would be!smile

Feb 12 14 04:12 am Link

Makeup Artist

BKellerman MUA

Posts: 129

Saint Louis, Missouri, US

no doubt about it!!! Great work!

Feb 20 14 08:29 pm Link