Forums >
General Industry >
Photography and Film major is #3 worst...
As a career path in terms of employment and revenues: http://www.kiplinger.com/slideshow/10-w … eer/9.html Well the ternary sector i.e services is certainly taking it on the chin in this downturn. Primary (food and energy) and Secondary (industrial and tangible assets production) are faring better, or the services sector that cater to them (i.e engineering/software/mathematics), which are a tiny minority of the ternary. If I mention Primary, Secondary and Ternary it is simply because the Ternary wouldn't be able to exist without the secondary, and the secondary without the primary. I guess time to photography models doing instructional videos for 90 tons trucks maintenance, the ones used in tar sands ore hauling Oct 14 12 01:30 am Link Visual Serotonin wrote: But TangibleAssetsProduction Mayhem just doesn't have the same ring to it. Oct 14 12 01:38 am Link Seems like if you're trying to get into photography solely for a money making goal, you're in the wrong profession. Oct 14 12 01:42 am Link Karl Blessing wrote: http://www.newser.com/story/103808/anni … raphy.html Oct 14 12 01:46 am Link Visual Serotonin wrote: lol, though she makes $2 mil a year... sounds more like poor financial management, but would rather blame it on consumers... Oct 14 12 01:52 am Link You mean I'm not going to be a millionaire? :p Oct 14 12 04:38 am Link "Likelihood of working retail: 2.6 times average" LMAO Oct 15 12 04:41 am Link Any major with the noun "porn" in it will always be on the top 3. ;P Oct 15 12 11:14 pm Link Visual Serotonin wrote: The article doesn't mention anything about the actual financial conundrum she found herself in. Oct 16 12 03:02 pm Link Visual Serotonin wrote: Rich people problems. Oct 16 12 04:14 pm Link College? To learn photography? Why? Oct 17 12 02:19 pm Link I think the point they're attempting to make is that filmmaking/photography are a poor choice to get in massive debt to have a degree in, not that they are pointless career paths. Both degrees are super expensive, and won't guarantee you a better/higher paid position in your field. Clients will either like your work and style or they won't. The primary concern is your vision and portfolio, not the piece of paper. Creative professions aren't like the business, finance or academic worlds, and the correlation between type and amount of degrees being a direct factor in a bigger, better job isn't nearly as strong. The only benefit I can think of off hand of having a degree in the arts is that it opens up the option of teaching somewhere down the line, if you so choose. Honestly, just about any creative would most likely be better off with a degree in business or marketing so they can effectively market/manage their creative endeavors. I know of tons of super talented folks who perpetually lose out on jobs to less skilled creatives simply because their business skills/fiscal management is piss poor. (Someone linked to Annie L. above.....amazingly talented, got bit in the ass by poor asset management) Oct 17 12 04:28 pm Link Were Number 3!!! Were Number 3!!! Oct 17 12 04:39 pm Link |