|
The opinion was "unnatural and plastic", so I want to know what do you think about this retouched photo. http://i48.tinypic.com/2u8fq60.jpg Thanks for your time! Dec 24 12 01:45 am Link FantasyArt wrote: I don't necessarily think it looks "plastic" (maybe a bit on the forehead though) Dec 25 12 06:35 pm Link Paul Snyder wrote: Was an attempt for an editorial... maybe is "over done" for this. Dec 26 12 01:06 am Link Its a soft touch I like it White is always hard to work on. Dec 26 12 01:18 am Link It looks plastic to me also as if a filter was applied. I like the original better. Editorial aren't overdone if you look around unless the photographer wants it that way but usually from what I have seen/experienced it isn't the case. Dec 29 12 11:06 am Link The face has an unnatural plasticy look, yes. I do like the contrast adjustment and background lightening though. The hair I liked better on the original. I think the face was moving in the right direction, moles, under-eye lines, forehead lines, etc. I just think it went too far with the face retouching. Dec 29 12 11:21 am Link I was given a reference http://i49.tinypic.com/2m6jpjb.jpg ... so I tried it ... I know that I don't made a good job. My mistake. Thanks for your help! Dec 29 12 12:24 pm Link Some people like that look, I personally would like to see something in between the two of them. Also the eyes are very dark. Dec 29 12 10:54 pm Link I like to keep men a little rougher, people kind of expect it. Dec 30 12 08:25 pm Link |
