Hello everybody! I have recently updated my portfolio with some new photos and like a serious critique. What do you really think about it?

Thank you,
Elisabetta

None of this looks even near professional.

Maybe those on the red backdrop, but it still isn't good photography, nude or not.

(For Elizabeth z).No big expert myself but it is possible some of the models are thinking you should incorporate more standard techniques into the poses-- look at some standard stuff - though it might be a bit cheezy ( not original) and do the same or basically same with minor adjustments. Like do the "S" stance with or without clothes. I have a great idea-- nobody today does the "partially undressed stuff" . Playboy(
(Pretty sure and a few other magazines) years ago before going full nude did partial nude stuff like -- I am leaning over and my zipper is not completely down. I call them "teaser shots".I like the one of you and the glasses. You could also do a shot where camera would be moved a few degrees more to left for a more angled approach. Try a fully dressed shot wearing a red skirt and black stockings and your hands are at top of stockings and your right hand is on right leg with fingers having pulled the stocking down just far enough to show top of it. Shoot it so that the camera is placed at same angle as the shot with the glasses. I do not think I will critique images like this again as I have no real desire to but just wanted to this time for fun. Suggested nudes are more fun.   Guys sometimes like to be teased !