You tell me, I'll tell you. Would you pay me? Trade with me? Or expect to be paid by me? You can even break it down into situations if you want. Example: I'd trade for this but expect payment for that. May 28 14 04:44 am Link I'd trade with you, but only if you're local. May 28 14 07:46 am Link Based on these pictures, I would trade (especially the third picture is really beautiful) : Based on this picture I wouldn't work with you even if you paid me! Based on this picture I'd work with you if you pay me Overall, unfortunately I tend to judge photographer by it's worst picture because there is always possibility that mine will also look like that. So I wouldn't do TF with you, and I'd pose for you if you pay me but with restrictions. If you didn't have a few bad pictures in your portfolio I'd say TF. May 28 14 12:12 pm Link J Jessica wrote: I would trade. Thank you. May 28 14 12:20 pm Link MartaBrixton wrote: If you had more like this in your portfolio, I'd consider trade.... May 28 14 12:36 pm Link Photons 2 Pixels Images wrote: Well, I was never asked to bring anything to the shoot other than myself (and of course some clothes or make up) Apparently it is enough for most people. May 28 14 01:22 pm Link i'd probably ask you to pay me. May 28 14 01:30 pm Link I would trade with you. I'm a broke college student and single mom working minimum wage so paying is not an option. May 28 14 02:08 pm Link honestly i would expect to be paid. your composite work is not good, and your exposures are all over the place. not only that but your post work.....lay off on the skin softening. it just looks gross. May 28 14 04:12 pm Link Babybean wrote: Trade. Possibly pay for the right idea. May 28 14 04:56 pm Link Morgan_Rose wrote: Trade for the right idea. May 28 14 04:57 pm Link Nephilum Photography wrote: Possible trade. May 28 14 05:00 pm Link LIES! i dont mean to be rude, but his photo right here proves you do. that is blantent gaussian blur, where you selected the skin, and not the bikini. i was taught photoshop by win wolloff, there is no camera setting that can make skin look like watercolor paintings. and if you had used a low apreture, the whole image would be blurred, and blurred in a different way. if you lie and say you dont, you are only cheating yourself. the lighting on the breasts are a dead giveaway, as well as the blurring of her cleavage lines. https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/28687793 May 28 14 05:05 pm Link Nephilum Photography wrote: You don't know as much as you think you do. And I really don't care who taught you. This effect has nothing to do with Photoshop. May 28 14 07:01 pm Link yes it does. you can not soften one portion of an image in camera. its either all soft, or sharp. or the point of the focal plane is shap and everything inbetween is soft. there is no way in hell you can have her bikini sharp, her chain sharp, and her skin soft when there is only an inch or less differential. i do know as much as i stated, thats why i have a degree and you dont. i was just trying to be honest, because i expect as much for me. but if you are going to lie, and be rude then so be it. that effect was done in post process and is the clear sign of an amatuer. as is the basic black and white technique you used as being a default monochromatic effect. May 28 14 08:01 pm Link Photons 2 Pixels Images wrote: The point is it's bad. May 30 14 08:58 pm Link you'd have to pay me, like a lot Jun 01 14 05:10 pm Link I would expect to be paid. I don't really see anything in your portfolio worth trading or paying for. Jun 01 14 06:34 pm Link Jun 01 14 07:39 pm Link if you would come up with a great idea, make up artist / hair and wardrobe stylist, I would do a TF with you. Jun 05 14 02:50 pm Link pay. only trade if you have really cool concept and have wardrobe/stylist Jun 05 14 04:25 pm Link |