Forums > Off-Topic Discussion > YouTube to block indie labels

Photographer

Michael Bots

Posts: 8020

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

From the Financial Times


YouTube to block indie labels as it launches paid music service
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/ea6728e2 … abdc0.html

"YouTube is about to begin a mass cull of music videos by artists including Adele and the Arctic Monkeys, after a number of independent record labels refused to sign up to the licensing terms for its new subscription service."

"Record labels representing 95 per cent of the music industry have signed up to the new terms, Mr Kyncl said. The remainder, which are asking European regulators to examine whether Google is abusing a dominant market position, will be blocked from the platform."


more at link  (8 free articles a month)



( There's always  Vimeo )

Jun 18 14 04:46 pm Link

Photographer

Solas

Posts: 10390

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Link doesnt work, says I need to pay to view.. ?

There's loads of ripped videos by those artists floating around on YT.. imagine the lawsuits, sounds like they're about to sign those bands' meal ticket

Vimeo doesn't allow commercial videos on their channel

Jun 18 14 04:49 pm Link

Photographer

highStrangeness

Posts: 2485

Carmichael, California, US

Michael Bots wrote:
( There's always  Vimeo )

This bad move on the part of YouTube might be good for Vimeo, actually.

Will be interesting to see what happens.

Jun 18 14 04:57 pm Link

Photographer

Jay Leavitt

Posts: 6745

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Jun 18 14 06:11 pm Link

Photographer

joeyk

Posts: 14895

Seminole, Florida, US

-JAY- wrote:

Well said.

Jun 18 14 06:23 pm Link

Photographer

Patrick Walberg

Posts: 45198

San Juan Bautista, California, US

-JAY- wrote:

joeyk wrote:
Well said.

-silence-


So if I sang "The Sound of Silence" I'd get sued?   

I'm biting my tongue on this one.  tongue

Jun 18 14 06:28 pm Link

Photographer

joeyk

Posts: 14895

Seminole, Florida, US

-JAY- wrote:

joeyk wrote:
Well said.

Patrick Walberg wrote:
-silence-


So if I sang "The Sound of Silence" I'd get sued?   

I'm biting my tongue on this one.  tongue

LOL

Well, at least don't video it and upload it to the tube...

Jun 18 14 06:32 pm Link

Photographer

Brian Diaz

Posts: 65617

Danbury, Connecticut, US

There is a lot of contradictory, misleading, or possibly just confusing information going around about this.

Here's a really good summary of what has actually been said by whom, what is unsubstantiated rumor, and what will happen next:

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2 … ic-service

Jun 18 14 06:36 pm Link

Photographer

Michael Kerrek

Posts: 1427

Orlando, Florida, US

Oh, no! Now they'll only have vimeo, vevo, dailymotion, veoh, metacafe, sqweasal, zippcast... and that's from a 2-second google. I'm sure there are more.

They're complaining about losing free internet hosting, publicity (everything on youtube links to many other "similar" videos), site maintenance overhead... so the YouTube free ride is over. They'll either change their minds, or someone else will pick up the indie slack.

Holy fucking entitlement issues. Nothing is free forever. These people are not "owed" anything. Other sites will pick up the slack, and there will be a new indie "youtube" variant.

Jun 19 14 05:05 am Link

Photographer

Brian Diaz

Posts: 65617

Danbury, Connecticut, US

It's not entitlement; it's negotiation.

YouTube made an offer to WIN.  WIN didn't like the offer, in part because it doesn't appear to be as good an offer as the major record companies received.  YouTube has threatened to remove or block content from WIN if they don't agree to the offer.  WIN wants to gain public support from YouTube's customers, who consume WIN's content.

Jun 19 14 08:11 am Link