Hi guys, I'm an amateur who wants to start with a decent portfolio. Of course, before the variety of the photos I'd have to choose, I know I have to have good photos first. The photos I have right now are mostly from test shoots, which is why they're minimally edited, if edited at all. I was hoping to know your insights about my current photos. Also, would it be better to have them edited, or is there a good thing about the photos being raw? Thanks in advance. Sep 09 14 05:14 am Link Let us know what type of modeling you wish to pursue and we can better direct the critique to something that will help you progress. There's a buddy system available where you can find a model and ask for a in-depth critique and direction. Also, refer to the images as "unedited" instead of RAW. RAW is a file type that comes from the camera and it gets a bit confusing. Most images are edited for color, exposure and light retouching to remove blemishes and unwanted dust/specks. Sep 09 14 11:47 am Link Carlo de Chavez wrote: As has been said, the preferred terminology is retouched and unretouched. Sep 09 14 12:06 pm Link Jennifer Haggerty wrote: Many thanks for the correction (and apologies) about the terminology, I'll keep that in mind for sure. As for the type of modeling, I'm thinking more of commercial and/or print. I didn't want to put this in Serious Critiques seeing as my port's not really headed towards anywhere specific as of the moment. Mark Salo wrote: Thanks for the insight, good point. No harm in showing a better photo. Sep 09 14 10:04 pm Link |