In all honesty i'm not sure which type of images should be hosted in a forum like this. As I look around i see all these crappy images with sheets used as backdrops for a half-naked girl getting praised. what do models want to see in an online portfolio like this? Do models want to see nudes/sexy images at all? How do other photographers feel about hosting diverse images as opposed to just the sexy ones? And last of all which images are good, great and which ones need to be tossed? thanks Sep 25 05 12:15 pm Link Chuck, I agree with you. I would rather see higher quality images that are diverse in nature. You are correct this site like many others has turned to a T&A show by misinformed wanna-bee Models and misinformed horny photographers. M Sep 25 05 12:36 pm Link Chuck Espinoza wrote: My personal opinion, be true to your photographic intentions and ignore what seems to be common or popular behaviour. Yes, nudes and sexy images get the most hits and comments, but do those hits and comments have any real value to you. And if you are a photographer of glamour or fine art nudes and you are being true to your goals, all of your hard work will be reduced to comments like "nice boobies" which has got to be just as painful as no comments on your non-nude images. Chuck Espinoza wrote: I had one image that was getting 10x the attention of the others in my portfolio because nipple bumps could be seen through the shirt. The whole idea of getting hits for that reason made me a little ill, so I pulled the image from my portfolio.... it has to be about the images, not the nipples. Chuck Espinoza wrote: Having answered the editorial part of your post, I'll go back and take another look at your images... Sep 25 05 12:50 pm Link Chuck IMHO I'd rather see diversity. Of course I am not a nude model so that could account for my feeling. I appreciate a photographer who can take a photo of a nude woman and take it beyond and make it interesting and beautiful. I happened to really like the nude in your portfolio. My feeling though... diversity rules! Sep 25 05 12:53 pm Link Sep 25 05 12:54 pm Link Chuck Espinoza wrote: That's what they want to see. Sep 25 05 02:52 pm Link Quoted form another thread in the critique section: ProShotPhoto wrote: Paul Ferrara wrote: I think I know what they want to see in a portfolio.. JM Dean wrote: Some Models arrive in my studio with messages on thier protfolio - "I DO OT DO NUDES DON"T EVEN ASK", and after a little while are completely naked doing nudes. I don't ask because of the statement and am usually surprised. My point is it is easy to get nude shots - and they limit the shots potential if this is the basis cof getting together. Sep 25 05 03:09 pm Link The protfolio critique. I like your moods and lighting adn most of the images. BUT Where are the headshots? Just look at your portfolio to see if there are any genres you are interested in doing more work in that are not being displayed. I agree that portfolios should be varied but yours has less variety than I expected in terms of the traditional genres. Sep 25 05 03:16 pm Link Thanks for your comments. But Headshots? I live in LA. They give away headshots with your happy meal out here. I do a lot of work for bands but in this forum that doesn't matter. I'm here, with the images Iâve selected, to meet and work with models to improve my photography and book. Bands, companies, productions and adult models/sites/companies hire me yet Iâm not trying to get any of that type of work from this venue so I keep those images to a minimum. Iâd love to hear more from models about the content and images Iâve chosen to show. Sep 25 05 06:30 pm Link |