This thread was locked on 2007-10-14 10:30:34
Photographer
R A Photography
Posts: 2698
Lawton, Oklahoma, US
This is from a shoot from yesterday. I would like to see if something creative could be done with it, but I don't know what right now. If anyone has any ideas, and would like to give it a try, please feel free. Of course, if I end up liking one of the edits and use it in my portfolio, editing credit will be given. So, without further adieu: please e-mail me for the larger image, as this one is the compressed file.
Photographer
Escalante
Posts: 5367
Chicago, Illinois, US
Latent Image64 wrote: WOW...way to many rules! NEW RULES! Just your best images! Alot of rules except the most important one: Regardless of the amount of editing/retouching/photoshopping done, A SHITTY PICTURE IS STILL A SHITTY PICTURE. NO amount of Photoshop can help it. E
Photographer
Jennifer Garcia
Posts: 9
Chico, California, US
Carl J Speed II wrote: I did a photo shoot, it was my 3rd after not shooting for ten years. I am really critical of what I like of my own, and I just didn't like any of the pictures that came out from the shoot. It makes me feel bad, because the girl in the photos is far more beautiful than I feel the photo makes her out to be - she's an eye-turner on the street. (I was helping a stylist friend who wanted shots for her book, so she did the makeup and hair to her preference) The images were not shot RAW, but high Jpeg (it was a friends Nikon D2x) Please help me make one good photo out of this (I picked what I felt was the best out of what there was) The 600 px version: The larger version: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y63/au … educed.jpg Here is my retouched version
Photographer
keithc
Posts: 165
New York, New York, US
Photographer
Vance C McDaniel
Posts: 7609
Los Angeles, California, US
ESCALANTE wrote:
Alot of rules except the most important one: Regardless of the amount of editing/retouching/photoshopping done, A SHITTY PICTURE IS STILL A SHITTY PICTURE. NO amount of Photoshop can help it. E Once again. Please refrain from comments and opinons. If you are not commenting on a picture (no critiques) than please simply view and move on. This is not a critiques thread. If you have comments about the thread itself contact myself or one of the other thread mods. thank you everyone....
Photographer
chbphoto
Posts: 384
Los Angeles, California, US
Here's my version of Vance's photo:
Photographer
iHartPhotos
Posts: 1263
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Bah... not too happy with this, but I spent time on it so I may-as-well post it.
Photographer
PK Digital Imaging
Posts: 3084
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Model Aimee LC has gotten permission from photographer Kevin M to edit their images. -PKD
Model
Fae D-Cay
Posts: 311
Las Vegas, Nevada, US
whew~ now that's a good way to feel stupid.
Model
333
Posts: 465
New York, New York, US
Photographer
Michele Cheeseman
Posts: 399
Redding, California, US
PK Digital Imaging wrote: Model Aimee LC has gotten permission from photographer Kevin M to edit their images. -PKD just a little fun
Photographer
Alma Mishale Miraval
Posts: 153
Albuquerque, New Mexico, US
PK Digital Imaging wrote: Model Aimee LC has gotten permission from photographer Kevin M to edit their images. -PKD
Model
Traciee
Posts: 308
Lafayette, Louisiana, US
This image has been approved. I do not have a photographer account set up just yet. I know it's not that great of a picture but would like to see something come of it. Make: NIKON CORPORATION Model: NIKON D70s Date Picture Taken: Jan 9, 2007, 9:28:11 PM Thank you in advance!
Photographer
keithc
Posts: 165
New York, New York, US
Photographer
Chipshotz
Posts: 880
Tampa, Florida, US
PK Digital Imaging wrote: Model Aimee LC has gotten permission from photographer Kevin M to edit their images. -PKD www.chipshotz.com
Photographer
Diable
Posts: 1857
Fairfax, Virginia, US
Model
Donezo
Posts: 196
Los Angeles, California, US
prizo wrote: Bah... not too happy with this, but I spent time on it so I may-as-well post it.
this is gorgeous. i love what you did with it.
Photographer
IrisSwope
Posts: 14857
Dallas, Texas, US
earthangeltbug wrote: This image has been approved. I do not have a photographer account set up just yet. I know it's not that great of a picture but would like to see something come of it. Make: NIKON CORPORATION Model: NIKON D70s Date Picture Taken: Jan 9, 2007, 9:28:11 PM Thank you in advance!
Photographer
Vance C McDaniel
Posts: 7609
Los Angeles, California, US
earthangeltbug wrote: This image has been approved. I do not have a photographer account set up just yet. I know it's not that great of a picture but would like to see something come of it. Make: NIKON CORPORATION Model: NIKON D70s Date Picture Taken: Jan 9, 2007, 9:28:11 PM Thank you in advance! Please edit so that largest side is no more than 600 pix...you can link to a larger image for download. Edit on Image shack..it will update here as well..
Photographer
IrisSwope
Posts: 14857
Dallas, Texas, US
Carl J Speed II wrote: I did a photo shoot, it was my 3rd after not shooting for ten years. I am really critical of what I like of my own, and I just didn't like any of the pictures that came out from the shoot. It makes me feel bad, because the girl in the photos is far more beautiful than I feel the photo makes her out to be - she's an eye-turner on the street. (I was helping a stylist friend who wanted shots for her book, so she did the makeup and hair to her preference) The images were not shot RAW, but high Jpeg (it was a friends Nikon D2x) Please help me make one good photo out of this (I picked what I felt was the best out of what there was) The 600 px version: The larger version: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y63/au … educed.jpg
Photographer
Vance C McDaniel
Posts: 7609
Los Angeles, California, US
earthangeltbug wrote: This image has been approved. I do not have a photographer account set up just yet. I know it's not that great of a picture but would like to see something come of it. Make: NIKON CORPORATION Model: NIKON D70s Date Picture Taken: Jan 9, 2007, 9:28:11 PM Thank you in advance!
Model
333
Posts: 465
New York, New York, US
Model
Lauren_K
Posts: 110
Dubuque, Iowa, US
John Ng wrote: ORIGINAL: EDITED:
*claps* wow your good with that photoshop! Nice work!
Model
Traciee
Posts: 308
Lafayette, Louisiana, US
Photographer
Vance C McDaniel
Posts: 7609
Los Angeles, California, US
D-Chan wrote: whew~ now that's a good way to feel stupid. This photo is not cleared...and I need to see if it fits in the guidlines of the thread.
Photographer
Vance C McDaniel
Posts: 7609
Los Angeles, California, US
Due to the size & popularity of the original PhotoShopping Thread (and headache moderating it was creating for us) we've broken it down into two threads. This one is for serious retouching work that will be used for promotional or commercial purposes ONLY. Gang..this means..Dont post poorly shot images to be fixed. If you are new and practicing photgrapher, use the fun PS thread for those images to be re-worked. Thanks all.. Vance PS Mod..
Photographer
iHartPhotos
Posts: 1263
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Photographer
Vance C McDaniel
Posts: 7609
Los Angeles, California, US
OK, When you grab an image for retouch..MAKE SURE YOU ARE GRABBING AN UNTOUCHED IMAGE>>READ THE POST PEOPLE> There is a reason we are not water marking in this thread.So make sure you are grabbing the correct image off line. BE AWARE!!!! And DO NOT POST IMAGES NOT meant to go into a photgraphers professional portfolio. MUAS..MODELS must.MUST MUST submit to mods for approval. No cam shots! No poorly lit I need a FIX shots. SERIOUS images. You know the difference and you know where you are as far as skill level goes. Read the rules. Please follow them to the letter. Be aware of what you are editing and be respectful of your fellow artist.
Photographer
dDavid
Posts: 616
Detroit, Michigan, US
DE Studios wrote:
Awesome retouch!
Photographer
From the Mind of Mystic
Posts: 128
Spartanburg, South Carolina, US
Diable wrote: Approved for Editing for: Erica Ramos (click image for full size)
(click image for full size) this took me about 8 mins. Nothing in my port took me more than 2-3 hrs.... have a little free time, but not a lot of "free" work... if interested, send me an email. EDIT: I said "not a lot..." did not state I was trying to gain monitary comp for this... it's a freebie. Was trying to be helpfull, not looking for work. Now I remember why I shy away from these threads. Ya'll have fun.
Photographer
Vance C McDaniel
Posts: 7609
Los Angeles, California, US
MysticM wrote:
(click image for full size) this took me about 8 mins. Nothing in my port took me more than 2-3 hrs.... have a little free time, but not a lot of "free" work... if interested, send me an email. Please read th erules and post accordingly..If you are looking for wok, please post in MM market. Thank you... The rules spell out how this thread works. Please read the rules. Vance Thread MOD
|