Forums >
Model Colloquy >
Undecided on nude actually....
Doug Swinskey wrote: There are textbook definitions for all kinds of words that we don't take them for what they "mean"...DO we need to start a new thread about this? Oct 20 05 04:41 pm Link yay I'm lucky numer 26! Oct 20 05 04:41 pm Link IsabelAurora wrote: once again..that would be be your interpretation...you are certainley able to come up with your own definitions or uses for words..but please dont expect anyone else to subscribe to those definitions or uses. Oct 20 05 09:38 pm Link good lord, are you really fighting over a definition of nude? Oct 20 05 10:01 pm Link ...Stacy wrote: you see fighting?...wow.. Oct 20 05 10:02 pm Link Bruce Caines wrote: I don't know about that...No matter how dilligently I market myself as a pornographer, I still get people asking me for fashion and even weddings occasionally. You'd think the scarlet [b]"P"[/i] i wear on my forehead would prevent that, but alas... Oct 21 05 06:28 am Link Melvin Moten Jr wrote: Quick question, Why does your release grant co-copyright to the model? That is unusual for professional photographers, except when being hired by a client (work-for-hire), and in that case, the person/company hiring gets sole copyright ownership. Just curious Oct 21 05 06:48 am Link |