Forums > Model Colloquy > About Models being too short :(

Photographer

Synergy Canada

Posts: 236

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

I simply can not believe the different forms of discrimination
I have encountered in this industry.

Height has never been a requirement for me to photograph
anyone or work with or even recommend someone to a client.

Some of the most beautiful women in the World are under 5' 3".

I have worked sittings with gorgeous people who would be
considered too short and they have thrived and found success.

Why is the industry so adamant about height? I see no sense
in precluding any person who presents a compelling presence
or image.

Exceptional beauty is not height dependent.

Nov 18 05 03:52 pm Link

Model

Mandie

Posts: 348

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US

I think you're right... For print.  For runway, however, there is an ideal that makes the clothes look best.  Currently, our society thinks that is very tall and very thin.  Other societies value other things, but that's the way it goes here and now! 

I feel your sadness though - I am only 5'6"!

Nov 18 05 03:56 pm Link

Photographer

Brian Diaz

Posts: 65617

Danbury, Connecticut, US

Beauty is not the sole requirement of modeling.

And there are lots of types of modeling that do not require women to be 5' 10".

Nov 18 05 04:02 pm Link

Photographer

Synergy Canada

Posts: 236

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Mandie:

     You are gorgeous. And you make my case in point beautifully.
Your image communicates class, charm, sensuality and femininity.

Brian:

     You are right of course on both of your points.
Although, as my profile states, I find inspiration in beauty and
this is the reason I am focused on it.

\/ Pamela \/ Thats so very true.

Nov 18 05 04:14 pm Link

Model

pamela mars

Posts: 1719

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

there's a ton of playboy models who are very short and ridiculously gorgeous.
it's a shame that they wouldn't get work outside of "girly" modelling.

Nov 18 05 04:17 pm Link

Model

theda

Posts: 21719

New York, New York, US

This again????

Do a search for height in which the myriad of reasons for height requirements are discussed ad nauseum by several full time pros in both the fashion and commercial realms.

It's a shallow industry with shallow rules.

Nov 18 05 04:17 pm Link

Photographer

Brian Diaz

Posts: 65617

Danbury, Connecticut, US

Synergy Canada wrote:
I find inspiration in beauty and this is the reason I am focused on it.

Good for you!  You are providing modeling opportunities for those who are not genetically qualified to be fashion models.  So you're part of the solution to your own problem.

(Although I wouldn't think it's such a problem, as you then get to work with a greater number of beautiful models, simply because you do not discriminate by height.)

Nov 18 05 04:18 pm Link

Photographer

Synergy Canada

Posts: 236

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Hi Theda:

    I'm really not interested in what other so called "Pro's" have to say
about height.

    Regardless of the reasons I will never think it's right to judge on such
a useless variant.

    In ten years I have had maybe 3 or 4 clients who have requested
a male or female model be a certain height. I strongly believe that the
motivation for this silly perception comes from what Mandie mentioned earlier
in the post "Public Perception". And it's dead wrong as far as I'm concerned.

Nov 18 05 04:22 pm Link

Model

JuicyPeach

Posts: 50

Baltimore, Maryland, US

I have been told I was to short for shoots before and I think it wasn't fair.

Nov 18 05 04:25 pm Link

Model

theda

Posts: 21719

New York, New York, US

Synergy Canada wrote:
Hi Theda:

    I'm really not interested in what other so called "Pro's" have to say
about height.

    Regardless of the reasons I will never think it's right to judge on such
a useless variant.

    In ten years I have had maybe 3 or 4 clients who have requested
a male or female model be a certain height. I strongly believe that the
motivation for this silly perception comes from what Mandie mentioned earlier
in the post "Public Perception". And it's dead wrong as far as I'm concerned.

It's the size of the sample clothes and products. I'm sorry if you don't like the reality of the industry, but that's the way it is.

Nov 18 05 04:27 pm Link

Photographer

Synergy Canada

Posts: 236

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Hi Brian:

    Yes thats true, if you look at my Port I just recently finished shooting
a commercial poster series for Pearl Drums. 3 of my models were 5' 4" or less
and only one was over 5' 5".

    Height requirements are stupid and just plain wrong. If the market can
bear plus size models then why the continued harping against height?

Silly World.

Nov 18 05 04:28 pm Link

Model

Angela Benedict

Posts: 331

Norwich, England, United Kingdom

You're singing my tune...

Nov 18 05 04:30 pm Link

Photographer

Synergy Canada

Posts: 236

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Hi Theda:

    Your right Theda, I don't like the reality of the industry.
I think it's sucks and it's unfair to alot of good people.

    You seem like a very intelligent person and I would hate to think
that the industry would discriminate against you for being intelligent.

Nov 18 05 04:31 pm Link

Model

JuicyPeach

Posts: 50

Baltimore, Maryland, US

Synergy Canada wrote:
Hi Brian:

    Yes thats true, if you look at my Port I just recently finished shooting
a commercial poster series for Pearl Drums. 3 of my models were 5' 4" or less
and only one was over 5' 5".

    Height requirements are stupid and just plain wrong. If the market can
bear plus size models then why the continued harping against height?

Silly World.

I agree 100%

Nov 18 05 04:31 pm Link

Photographer

Synergy Canada

Posts: 236

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Pamela:

      My thoughts exactly.

Someone once mentioned to me in a passing conversation,
that what some individuals lacked in perceived height they
made up for in beauty. smile

Nov 18 05 04:39 pm Link

Photographer

Doug Lester

Posts: 10591

Atlanta, Georgia, US

Don't blame the photographers or modeling agencies, they are simply doing what their clients, the ones who pay everyone, what they require. Clothing designers want mannequins, not 'real' women, they want 'clothes hangers' who will not distrct from their clothing designs. Second, they usually provide only a couole of sizes for photo shoots. If you are not in those sizes, then you are out of luck. It's true that commercial work does not have a height requirement, but most model agencies prefer models who can do both commercial and fashion, that's far more lucrative for them. So they stick with the height and size requirements for fashion work.

Nov 18 05 04:55 pm Link

Photographer

Brian Diaz

Posts: 65617

Danbury, Connecticut, US

I'm not necessarily making it, but the argument could be made that it's not fair that the industry discriminates against ugly people, too.  Why can't people with terrible acne be in makeup commercials?  How about those with giant, crooked noses?  Would you blame someone for passing on a model with a lazy eye? 

The fashion industry found that they can make the most money by using models with certain genetic qualities, and height happens to be one of them.  And like it or not, fashion is a business based on profits.  You say it's not fair that they don't hire shorter models, but would it be fair for shorter models to cut into a company's profits?

Nov 18 05 05:05 pm Link

Photographer

Synergy Canada

Posts: 236

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Hello all:

    It seems as though there is a general lack of faith about how the
public, or market if you will, would respond to change.

    With the push on reality T.V. shows and other types of reality based
content you would think that advertising agencies would learn to be
more realistic about the human resources they selected.

    I have worked with a model who had one eye, she had something called
a scleral shell in her eye socket. She was stunning. Her eye seemed on the
lazy side but the inconsistency made her more unique and interesting.

    I shot a male model with one leg. For a running shoe ad back in the late 80's.
Adidas. He was what the industry would consider short and not particulalry
attractive but he had alot of personality.

    Advertising agencies have used some very unappealing sports figures,
look at Don Cherry in all those NHL posters and ads. Yuck. LOL

    Things have to change! I want them to change.

Brian:

    A large Corporation who has an established Worldwide
market making billions of dollars could use a kick in the ass.

   They could also benefit from acknowledging that they too
have been blinded by the self perpetuating image of the so
called "Perfect" image.

    Although your point about them banking on the perfect
image rings true, their advertising methodologies continue to
propogate a so called ideal which is just not realistic.

    Real consumers are the key target, the World is changing
and consumers are becoming fast aware of all the BS that
the advertising industry is propogating in an effort to curry
favor.

    I am just passionately driving for change with the little
I can achieve from my own limited position.

Nov 18 05 05:19 pm Link

Model

Mayae

Posts: 52

Toledo, Illinois, US

I completely agree. I wish the industry would change also. I have been turned down many times because I was too short.

Nov 18 05 05:26 pm Link

Photographer

udor

Posts: 25255

New York, New York, US

Synergy Canada wrote:
Hello all:

    Things have to change! I want them to change.

So... why don't you exclusively shoot short models?

Make it a marketing tool for yourself that you don't shoot anybody over 5'6", create the market and pay those models.

You and I know that you can add a few inches on a model, depending the angle of the camera (that's what I do when I shoot short models).

If done well, you can't usually tell how short a model is unless you have a direct visual point of reference, with recognizable proportions.

You know... if you work with fashiondesigners... OMG... I wanted to avoid regurgitating this part...

Anyway... if you work with fashion designers, there are several criteria why the models have to have a minimum height on the runway...

Models should be able to be seen from far away on long runways, and several rows back on the seating arrangements. A tall model can be better seen from further away.

If a model gets sick... doesn't show, whatever, the dress must be able to be worn by any other model there... that's why there is a certain uniformity.

Hence the dresses are all cut so that a tall model can wear them, can be seen from far away, looks good etc.

That has nothing to do with discrimination, but everything with practicality.

There are tons of shorter models for print and other commercial work... but they can't do the runway, at least not at the bigger shows.

However, again, as theda pointed out... the clothing samples have to fit the model... and something that is tailored for let's say a 5'7" model will just look ridiculous on a 5'2" model... not matter how gorgeous the shorter one is and what a killer bod she may have...

"If the clothes don't fit, you musta quit!" wink

So, those are the realities of the industry... height requirements have technical reasons and are not a judgement call on the looks of the model.

But... as I said... why don't YOU start to change the industry by taking the hot and gorgeous rejects from mainstream.

You just have to figure out how to make money and whom to sell the images, unless they pay you for their portfolio shots.

Good luck

Udo

Nov 18 05 05:37 pm Link

Photographer

Synergy Canada

Posts: 236

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Hi Mayae:

   You are beautiful. And so are the other Models who responded to this
thread.

    I think it's shameful and wasteful to turn away people who not only
have a desire and passion to promote but have attributes which are
so marketable.

    The performing artists in this industry, and thats what models are,
would give their everything for a chance to please a large contractor.

    This is the passion which makes a person a dynamic choice for a
company.

    This passion is also what gets young hopefuls into trouble when
unscrupulous agencies, individuals or agents clue in on this desperate
hope, and driving passion.

    I wish I could dispatch a guardian angel to watch over each and every one
of your shoulders to protect you all from these tyrants.

Nov 18 05 05:37 pm Link

Model

SarahSVET

Posts: 331

Los Angeles, California, US

If the industry changes then EVERYONE that is remotely attractive would be able to model then there wont be a demand for fashion models because EVERYONE in the world is a model. Plus I think clothes look better (personally) on tall and skinny you notice the clothes more and your not concentrating on anything else. tall and skinny have been "in" in the fashion industry for over almost 40 years. It obviously works and sells...so sorry its not going to change.

oh and one more thing..I've said it once I'll say it again. Modeling is a business if your not qualified then it isnt for you. Thats not mean just realistic... I dont qualify to be president no matter how bad I want to be I wasnt born in this country there for I cant do it..am I mad? no...just being realistic.

Nov 18 05 05:40 pm Link

Photographer

S W I N S K E Y

Posts: 24376

Saint Petersburg, Florida, US

Synergy Canada wrote:
I simply can not believe the different forms of discrimination
I have encountered in this industry.

you must be real new to it then...

the modeling industry is brutal, where you are judged solely on your looks..

its not discrimination, you have to fit the clothes or the vision of the creative team.

a model will get way more negativity then affirmation...

and no..not everyone can be a model..

but thats why its such an accomplishment, whe one does "make it"..

Nov 18 05 05:42 pm Link

Photographer

S W I N S K E Y

Posts: 24376

Saint Petersburg, Florida, US

JuicyPeach wrote:
I have been told I was to short for shoots before and I think it wasn't fair.

want fair?

look it up in the dictionary..you wont find it in the modeling industry....

i see photographers making hundreds of thousands of dollars creating images for high end magazines..a good bunch of these are the same quality of images i throw away..

not it isnt "fair"...

Nov 18 05 05:43 pm Link

Photographer

udor

Posts: 25255

New York, New York, US

SarahSVET wrote:
EVERYONE in the world is a model.

That appears a lot online... everybody with a webcam is indeed a model.

Udo

Nov 18 05 05:44 pm Link

Photographer

J O H N A L L A N

Posts: 12221

Los Angeles, California, US

Nov 18 05 05:48 pm Link

Photographer

Synergy Canada

Posts: 236

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Hi UdoR:

    Yes that does make alot of sense, I'm not privvy to the specifications
and technical requirements of the runway scene.

    But your right, and I have, over the last 3 years, been shooting
more and more models considered too short.

    I don't charge models for portfolios and I never have. It's always been a
creative collaboration.

    My commercial shoots have always paid Union wages at the ACTRA,
scale. The equivalent pay scale for the actors union in the U.S.

    I'm not greedy because I don't need to be. I treat people fairly, equitably
and honestly. My equipment has already paid for itself so I have no overhead.

    I really enjoy working with people and am often surprized at how creative
and interesting they can be.

    Thank you for your kind and informative reply UdoR smile

Nov 18 05 05:48 pm Link

Model

Josie Nutter

Posts: 5865

Seattle, Washington, US

There ARE many types, but a lot of these petite girls (or guys) say they want to make it big in fashion/runway.  Not gonna happen...

Nov 18 05 07:47 pm Link

Model

Drew

Posts: 26

Guys have it worse!

/angry face

Nov 18 05 07:52 pm Link

Model

Kara Leung

Posts: 26

Santa Barbara, California, US

Beauty is not common, otherwise it would just be plain... that's why there are your average folk, and your beautiful people, and then your tall and beautiful people.

All jobs are certain qualifications and modeling has its own set of requirements.

Nov 18 05 08:00 pm Link

Model

Dana Nicole

Posts: 130

NEPTUNE, New Jersey, US

While the norms are the norms and they will probably always be that way whether fair or not, personally I don't think it should matter for print modeling because there are so many ways of making you appear taller if need be.  Camera angles, positioning, etc, you can always fake it.

Being 5'2, I sympathize with all the shorties.  And while we can all complain about the requirements, I'm pretty sure we won't get anywhere.

Nov 18 05 08:44 pm Link

Photographer

S W I N S K E Y

Posts: 24376

Saint Petersburg, Florida, US

Dana Nicole wrote:
While the norms are the norms and they will probably always be that way whether fair or not, personally I don't think it should matter for print modeling because there are so many ways of making you appear taller if need be.  Camera angles, positioning, etc, you can always fake it.

Being 5'2, I sympathize with all the shorties.  And while we can all complain about the requirements, I'm pretty sure we won't get anywhere.

commerical print doesn't care about height..and there are way more commercial print jobs then fashion...

Nov 18 05 08:46 pm Link

Photographer

udor

Posts: 25255

New York, New York, US

BTW... if anybody cares... although I deal with the tall girls... I find many shorties extremely sexy and could be in a serious relationship with many if all comes together... but that is me as a person... it's different when it concerns my business.

Nov 18 05 08:50 pm Link

Makeup Artist

Camera Ready Studios

Posts: 7191

Dallas, Texas, US

this industry is very discriminatory...

Against...

1) short people
2) fat people
3) ugly people
4) people with bad skin
5) people missing limbs
6) people over 40

I could go on but you get the message....

desperation eliminates most forms of discrimination....you can find lots of people to shoot tfp....

GWC doesn't discriminate.......UNLESS you want to keep your clothing on, you may then encounter some discrimination. smile

people with real money and power in the  industry are very discriminatory...the more money and power they have the more discriminatory they are. If you don't believe me, go look at the real power brokers work and look at the models they choose to work with.

Nov 18 05 08:55 pm Link

Model

newhall243

Posts: 652

Rosedale, New York, US

Nov 18 05 08:56 pm Link

Photographer

udor

Posts: 25255

New York, New York, US

Mary wrote:
this industry is very discriminatory...

Against...

1) short people
2) fat people
3) ugly people
4) people with bad skin
5) people missing limbs
6) people over 40

I could go on but you get the message....

desperation eliminates most forms of discrimination....you can find lots of people to shoot tfp....

GWC doesn't discriminate.......UNLESS you want to keep your clothing on, you may then encounter some discrimination. smile

people with real money and power in the  industry are very discriminatory...the more money and power they have the more discriminatory they are. If you don't believe me, go look at the real power brokers work and look at the models they choose to work with.

Dear Mary;

Although I know that I am on your "ignore list"... still... I agree with you 100%.

Later

Udo

Nov 18 05 08:59 pm Link

Photographer

udor

Posts: 25255

New York, New York, US

newhall243 wrote:

Nov 18 05 09:01 pm Link

Makeup Artist

Camera Ready Studios

Posts: 7191

Dallas, Texas, US

UdoR wrote:

Dear Mary;

Although I know that I am on your "ignore list"... still... I agree with you 100%.

Later

Udo

LOL!   why would you be on my ignore list?

Nov 18 05 09:05 pm Link

Photographer

Kevin Connery

Posts: 17824

El Segundo, California, US

Synergy Canada wrote:
I think it's shameful and wasteful to turn away people who not only
have a desire and passion to promote but have attributes which are
so marketable.

I can almost guarantee that if they were marketable, they wouldn't be turned away. Almost by definition--it's a money-driven field on the advertising front.

It may well be a silly "rule", but it is what the fashion industry-as-a-whole demands. Going against it will simply make the work a lot harder, and many not result in any success.

Maybe it's wrong. Certainly it's "discriminatory". (See Mary's post for other places in which it's discriminatory.) It's also a justifiable (if perhaps not justified) discrimination.

Nov 18 05 11:32 pm Link

Photographer

MWPortraits

Posts: 7024

Kansas City, Missouri, US

Mary wrote:
this industry is very discriminatory...

Against...

1) short people
2) fat people
3) ugly people
4) people with bad skin
5) people missing limbs
6) people over 40

I could go on but you get the message....

desperation eliminates most forms of discrimination....you can find lots of people to shoot tfp....

GWC doesn't discriminate.......UNLESS you want to keep your clothing on, you may then encounter some discrimination. smile

people with real money and power in the  industry are very discriminatory...the more money and power they have the more discriminatory they are. If you don't believe me, go look at the real power brokers work and look at the models they choose to work with.

Really? Personally, I think there are very marketable short, fat, ugly, and over 40 quite present in the entertainment industry today. Diane Lane, Jack Nicholson, Kathy Bates, Elaine Stritch...?

Tommorow I'm shooting two women 35+, both under 5 ft 7. One's 5 ft tall, even... And I'm thrilled! Does that drop me to GWC status? In some of your eyes, it's likely. Hell, I'm still shooting with Torchiere lamps for lighting with cotton sheet diffusers because I haven't saved enough money yet to buy a basic kit yet. Sometime even I think I qualify for the not-so-endearing title of GWC. But in the back of my mind, I know that it's the outcome of the photo, the talent, and the creativity that counts.

My point is, my view of beauty, of worth, and marketability is vastly different from most people here, and I'm perfectly fine with that. Maybe if the people who set the standards and had power were more open to all forms of beauty, the industry in which we work wouldn't be viewed with such disdain.

Nov 19 05 12:12 am Link