Forums >
Off-Topic Discussion >
MJ NOT GUILTY
Posted by Reese: And on that note..... Jun 14 05 10:21 am Link The jurors were morons. A an airline stewardess testified to MJ giving wine in coke cans to the kids. NOT ONE WITNESS refuted that testimony and she was never impugned. Not Guilty on giving alcohol to minors. The jury were all "That mother snapped her fingers at us, blah, blah" - ergo MJ is innocent. I hope some one in Law Enforcement pulls a sting on thie POS and videotapes it showing the world what a scumbag he is. It should be easy to do, he's addicted to little boys. Jun 20 05 02:01 am Link Posted by vanscottie: Van, not to retry the case, but from what I heard 2 witnesses testified directly on this issue. One witness, Cynthia Montgomery (who is a travel agent/consultant) testified that Jackson liked his wine in soda cans. This information came to her from a flight attendant. Unfortunately, Ms. Montgomery is currently being investigated by the FBI. In addition, she's actually party to a lawsuit against Jackson. And, she was relaying information that she supposedly heard from another source, and not directly from Jackson himself. I'm not sure about the jury being morons, but in my book, that doesn't make her the best (as in clean) witness. Jun 20 05 02:44 am Link Posted by !MDF: The parents just want millions of dollars in "settlement". Jun 20 05 10:01 am Link why is it that OJ and now MJ get all these defenders and yet the public was silent about Robert Blake, and I don't recall pickiting at the Westerfield trial (and I was there the whole time) I don't recall any Mark Peterson defenders outside his family. Where was Jesse Jackson? anyone know his view on these guys? what about Al Sharpton, where was he? By the way. A good deal of the people on the jury of MJ thought he was guily, they stated after the trial that they were pretty sure he had molested children but there wasn't enough evidence in this case. I have no clue about his guilt or innocence but from the evidence I saw I agree with the jury that he probably has molested children but you can't convict on this boys testimony, he just wasnt a good witness for the prosecution, thanks to his sick, deranged mother. Jun 21 05 12:30 am Link |