Photographer
Glen Berry
Posts: 2797
Huntington, West Virginia, US
Legs don't spread open, they spread apart. If your leg ever spreads open, seek immediate medical attention! 
Photographer
AmGlamStudios
Posts: 336
Weymouth, Massachusetts, US
Photographer
AmGlamStudios
Posts: 336
Weymouth, Massachusetts, US
Model
Holly Rae D
Posts: 97
Lansing, Michigan, US
This has got to be the most disgusting thread I've ever happened upon... What about a women showing off her clit is artistic and classy? I think you need to look at your dictionary again, if I want porn, I'll go to a porn site. and if you're looking to be a porn star, maybe this isn't the place for you.
Photographer
Jerry Nemeth
Posts: 33355
Dearborn, Michigan, US
Check out MetArt. There are some MetArt models on MM.
Photographer
no name no more
Posts: 1582
Brooklyn, New York, US
Holly Rae D wrote:
This has got to be the most disgusting thread I've ever happened upon... What about a women showing off her clit is artistic and classy? I think you need to look at your dictionary again, if I want porn, I'll go to a porn site. and if you're looking to be a porn star, maybe this isn't the place for you. What you consider "porn", can be art to someone else.
And just so ya know..."porn" is an act of sex graphically depicted in imagery.
Retoucher
Retouch by Sarra
Posts: 243
Fargo, North Dakota, US
Holly Rae D wrote:
This has got to be the most disgusting thread I've ever happened upon... What about a women showing off her clit is artistic and classy? I think you need to look at your dictionary again, if I want porn, I'll go to a porn site. and if you're looking to be a porn star, maybe this isn't the place for you. +1000
Sounds like it was meant to be fashion models. But most of the stuff posted in here is porn. Bad quality GWC or self shot porn.
A woman touching herself in bad lighting with no aesthetic appeal pose or image wise isn't art - so therefor it qualifies under the porn category for these purposes.
Photographer
MLRPhoto
Posts: 5766
Olivet, Michigan, US
Holly Rae D wrote:
This has got to be the most disgusting thread I've ever happened upon... What about a women showing off her clit is artistic and classy? I think you need to look at your dictionary again, if I want porn, I'll go to a porn site. and if you're looking to be a porn star, maybe this isn't the place for you. OMG!!!
Porn: (18+)
https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/p … 1#16169171
More along the lines of the OP's goals:
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/100811/20/4c6370f1bf950_m.jpg]()
![https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/080807/16/489b5feeb2420_m.jpg]()
Photographer
MLRPhoto
Posts: 5766
Olivet, Michigan, US
Holly Rae D wrote:
This has got to be the most disgusting thread I've ever happened upon... What about a women showing off her clit is artistic and classy? I think you need to look at your dictionary again, if I want porn, I'll go to a porn site. and if you're looking to be a porn star, maybe this isn't the place for you. Sarra Sanborn wrote:
+1000
Sounds like it was meant to be fashion models. But most of the stuff posted in here is porn. Bad quality GWC or self shot porn.
A woman touching herself in bad lighting with no aesthetic appeal pose or image wise isn't art - so therefor it qualifies under the porn category for these purposes. I haven't looked at everything here, by any means, but an image can be art, porn, both, or neither. Even a nude image.
Photographer
AmGlamStudios
Posts: 336
Weymouth, Massachusetts, US
Model
JadeDRed
Posts: 5620
London, England, United Kingdom
Holly Rae D wrote:
This has got to be the most disgusting thread I've ever happened upon... What about a women showing off her clit is artistic and classy? I think you need to look at your dictionary again, if I want porn, I'll go to a porn site. and if you're looking to be a porn star, maybe this isn't the place for you. Why do you hate clitorisis, thats not nice, you will hurt their feelings 
Just noticed the first line, you're new here right?
Model
JadeDRed
Posts: 5620
London, England, United Kingdom
Sarra Sanborn wrote:
+1000
Sounds like it was meant to be fashion models. But most of the stuff posted in here is porn. Bad quality GWC or self shot porn.
A woman touching herself in bad lighting with no aesthetic appeal pose or image wise isn't art - so therefor it qualifies under the porn category for these purposes. OMG its the art/porn police, run guys its a bust!!!
|
