JEBKA Photography wrote:

And if she becomes rich and famous, sell the damn things to TMZ and make a chunk o money.

If you don't want to have those kinda shots haunt you, don't take em.
It really is that simple.

You are a model.
You are a business.

Claiming coersion or "I didn't know" simply states the obvious.
You won't be a business very long.

Only you can control your image.
You didn't control it like you wanted.
It is your fault.
After all, you are your own CEO

I believe your company has just been downgraded to junk stock.

Perfect!  I believe she's due for a government bailout!  Awesome.  :^)

Stella Dean wrote:
Seeing as how her logic about what is "acceptable" or not is questionable, me thinks the pics in question probably aren't so arty.

oh hogwash i am sure they are art!!!!

::chanting::

put 'em in your port!
put 'em in your port!
put 'em in your port!
put 'em in your port!
put 'em in your port!
put 'em in your port!

Image K wrote:
I regret all that AIG stock that I bought last year...

Maybe I can get people to feel sorry for me.

Damn, now you got me thinking about my 201k... 

Also, in regards to the post above, that I'm too lazy to actually quote.  When you said no one is saying what the photographer did is wrong, the point myself and others are making is that if someone, even wrong, got some shots of your precious hoohoo on the sly, its not the worst most damaging thing in the world.  Hell I'd be 10x's more pissed if someone stole $50 out of my jeans than if they snuck a peek at my little man.

WillSpringfield wrote:

oh hogwash i am sure they are art!!!!

::chanting::

put 'em in your port!
put 'em in your port!
put 'em in your port!
put 'em in your port!
put 'em in your port!
put 'em in your port!

WILL REALLY WANTS TO SEE EM!

Basically just do nudes to your discretion Miss Santos and you won't have any problems...if you ever feel pressured....then dont do it.
Me however, loves nudies...But I never take them...Odd isn't it?
Im also gonna act...well i act a ass daily.

CGI Images wrote:

Damn, now you got me thinking about my 201k... 

Also, in regards to the post above, that I'm too lazy to actually quote.  When you said no one is saying what the photographer did is wrong, the point myself and others are making is that if someone, even wrong, got some shots of your precious hoohoo on the sly, its not the worst most damaging thing in the world.  Hell I'd be 10x's more pissed if someone stole $50 out of my jeans than if they snuck a peek at my little man.

Well thats exactly the point I'm making.  To a woman, her hoohoo IS the $50 in your jeans.  THATS why she's pissed.

DarioImpiniPhotography wrote:

Well thats exactly the point I'm making.  To a woman, her hoohoo IS the $50 in your jeans.  THATS why she's pissed.

I know thats what your saying, and I think thats a ridiculous thing someone thinks that a particular body part is more or less precious just by being what it is.  The context and circumstances are what makes something "precious" or not, not by sheer virtue of existing.

Its a societal brainwash with sexuality.

Miss Santos wrote:
Last week for the first time I took nude photographs. The shoot was supposed to be implied but the photographer kept telling me he had to have body shots for his port since he had none and that my identity and face would remain anonymous. We took many artistic and commercial shots in black and white with white sheets. We did several poses and when I got my pictures back there were many were u could see everything genitals and all WITH my face exposed. I know at the time I let him take the photographs but NEVER did I intend on taking full nude pictures, probably my whole career. I plan on going into acting and if I ever make a name for myself I don't want these pictures to come back after me. I regret taking any full nudes. The other ones were cool now I'm uncomfortable and uneasy that there are nude pictures of me out there. What can I do? Yeah yeah I know I agreed at the time but I regret it now and I don't feel right. Is there anything I can do to protect my privacy?

if you both agreed to do body shots only and no face or identiy well then he should hand over the offending images, but you said that the images contained genitals. Had you been aware that you may have had some private bits showing?
Well at that time you should of had stopped the shoot, and if you were shooting digital at the time you could  had looked at what he was taking and edited the image.....

WillSpringfield wrote:

oh hogwash i am sure they are art!!!!

::chanting::

put 'em in your port!
put 'em in your port!
put 'em in your port!
put 'em in your port!
put 'em in your port!
put 'em in your port!

From being friends with Mr Ayola....I always think of butthole when I see port. So basically you are chanting "Put 'em in your asshole" and it makes me giggle

CGI Images wrote:

I know thats what your saying, and I think thats a ridiculous thing someone thinks that a particular body part is more or less precious just by being what it is.  The context and circumstances are what makes something "precious" or not, not by sheer virtue of existing.

Its a societal brainwash with sexuality.

Dude, just look at all the zillions of threads about doing nudes on here.  THATs what all that is really about.  Its the "goods".  Its the bank account.  Dress it up, shave it down, tatoo it, paint it, it all boils down to the same thing.  The only reason anyone wants to look at it art or otherwise is because its the bank account.

Post your bank account.  Go ahead.  In pixel detail, down to the penny.  Probably not going to are you.  Same reason.

Ryan Burleson wrote:
Just tell the photog what you have posted here, I would never want to offend a model with publishing photos like this they did not want. See if he can edit them, hopefully this works out.

Miss Santos wrote:

The first one is someone elses breast just my tongue nothing I'd ever be ashamed of because it is artistic. The second one you can barely see anything.

What is the difference between artistic nudes and that??

They still include nudity and plus you can't see the other model's face, so the only person who would get judged for it would be you and your honey covered tounge.

Regardless, It doesn't matter what kind of pictures you take as a model, if you're a fantastic actress, no one will necessarily hold your nudes against you. And the same thing goes for acting, if you ever get approached to do a nude scene or a sex scene.

Anyway the bottom line is that people are always going to judge you whether you have art nudes or pics with a t-shirt and pants. And since you're going into acting, don't expect people to embrace you out there.........it's extremely rough and unforgiving.

Just be confident with your talent, and ignore peoples judgement about you, because, no matter what you're going to get eaten alive if you let a few nudes get in your way. And destroy your chances of having a prosperous acting career.

Just talk to the photog if you really don't want them out there, besides without a model release, it's illegal for him to sell the pictures without your consent.

Image K wrote:

If she was forced to take these pictures, I would agree with you.

She agreed to take them, and that changes things drastically.

She's a big girl. She needs to stop playing the role of "the victim", and take ownership and personal responsibility of a situation that she had a hand in creating.

Your last sentence has nothing to do with this thread. Apples and oranges.

Yes what this person said. Assaulted for dressing slutty has nothing to do with being hoodwinked. In fact the title of this thread should have been. I'VE BEEN HOODWINKED!!!

Ed Burns Photography wrote:
Dear Miss Santos,

     We regret to inform you that you have not been chosen as one of the contestants on the next installment of "Flavor of Love 5: This Time I'm REALLY Seriously Gonna' Find My Truly Romantical Mate" with Flavor Flav.  It has come to our attention that you once posed for what we've determined to be scandalous images.  As you know, the Flavor of Love franchise represents wholesome, family oriented viewing, so we do not want to have our reputation affected by actors of low moral character.  We're sure you'll understand.

Regards,

VH-1

P.S.  Don't bother applying for Bret Michael's "Rock of Love 7: Cure for the Itch and Genital Warts", we run that show as well.


Oh yeah...I could see how this could sink someone's career.

DarioImpiniPhotography wrote:
Dude, just look at all the zillions of threads about doing nudes on here.  THATs what all that is really about.  Its the "goods".  Its the bank account.  Dress it up, shave it down, tatoo it, paint it, it all boils down to the same thing.  The only reason anyone wants to look at it art or otherwise is because its the bank account.

Post your bank account.  Go ahead.  In pixel detail, down to the penny.  Probably not going to are you.  Same reason.

Yeah "dude" I get what your saying, I'm saying its the context that matters not the "what" so much.   

A cheesy "thong" shot is more "negative" when it comes to art than a tasteful nude. 

And really if you want to see my "bank account" so bad and the opportunity comes up for you, look, enjoy, giggle if you will.  But its not going to destroy my life like so many delicate flowers going on about it here.

So in whatever context the "bank account" is shown, or for however and whatever reasons people enjoy seeing "bank accounts", its not the most horrible freaking thing in the world.

Kirsten Anderson wrote:
What I find very interesting is that throughout the entire 5 pages of this thread, not one person seems to have questioned the photographers integrity.

The OP states that she told the photog she wasn't comfortable with full nudity, but he coerced her into doing it, with the promise that her face would not be captured.  Now it turns out her face is visible, and her privates are spread wide - I doubt the chances of him obliging her wishes at THIS point are slim, since he didn't seem to have any respect for them the first time around.

If he obliges her wishes, (and nobody ever comes across them on an internet porn site), then he regains some credibility.  If he doesn't, he's a snake.

Now the OP's integrity on the other hand, has gone through the ringer.  BUT regardless of what she has in her port already, people do have personal boundaries, and if she felt hers were crossed, than she is entitled to feeling that way.  In MY opinion I'd sooner have a tasteful b&w art nude in my port than the "controversial honey shot", but that is my preference. The OP clearly has a different set of standards as to what she deems acceptable, and she's entitled to that.

My guess is what happened was that, based on the types of images the OP has in her port, the photog figured he could push her a little further for his own agenda.  And now we're back to the age-old debate:
If a girl dresses like a slut to when she goes to a bar, and gets assaulted, is it her fault because "she asked for it"?

I personally saw no need to question the photographer's integrity because it is immaterial to me.

Less than honorable photographers are always pushing for more.  Models need to know their limits and keep "regrets" from happening.

Chicks who can't do that need to take up another hobby.  This is an opportunistic industry.

This is absolutely nothing like the girl in a short skirt getting assaulted in a bar.  No one forced the OP to do anything.

Ed Burns Photography wrote:
Dear Miss Santos,

     We regret to inform you that you have not been chosen as one of the contestants on the next installment of "Flavor of Love 5: This Time I'm REALLY Seriously Gonna' Find My Truly Romantical Mate" with Flavor Flav.  It has come to our attention that you once posed for what we've determined to be scandalous images.  As you know, the Flavor of Love franchise represents wholesome, family oriented viewing, so we do not want to have our reputation affected by actors of low moral character.  We're sure you'll understand.

Regards,

VH-1

P.S.  Don't bother applying for Bret Michael's "Rock of Love 7: Cure for the Itch and Genital Warts", we run that show as well.


Oh yeah...I could see how this could sink someone's career.

MelissaLynnette LaDiva wrote:
This is absolutely nothing like the girl in a short skirt getting assaulted in a bar.  No one forced the OP to do anything.

Once again my fellow kansan is correct.  Forcing someone to do something is completely different, and EVEN then sneaking a peek at their junk is not the worst thing in the world.

MelissaLynnette LaDiva wrote:

I personally saw no need to question the photographer's integrity because it is immaterial to me.

Less than honorable photographers are always pushing for more.  Models need to know their limits and keep "regrets" from happening.

Chicks who can't do that need to take up another hobby.  This is an opportunistic industry.

This is absolutely nothing like the girl in a short skirt getting assaulted in a bar.  No one forced the OP to do anything.

opportunistic INDEED. you have no idea how many times i have heard people say... JOIN model mayhem... theres a bunch of photographers there where you can get free pics.

well for free pics... you get naked offers in exchange for free pics... and here is where opportunistic turns into the two way opportunist battle fo rsupremacy....

guess who won

CGI Images wrote:

Once again my fellow kansan is correct.  Forcing someone to do something is completely different, and EVEN then sneaking a peek at their junk is not the worst thing in the world.

haha i dont sneak  peeks at junk... i ell models...


SHOW ME!

WillSpringfield wrote:

opportunistic INDEED. you have no idea how many times i have heard people say... JOIN model mayhem... theres a bunch of photographers there where you can get free pics.

well for free pics... you get naked offers in exchange for free pics... and here is where opportunistic turns into the two way opportunist battle fo rsupremacy....

guess who won

Speaking of being opportunistic, I'm only your friend so I can borrow your shoes to wear in shoots.   

Miss Santos wrote:
Do u think its too late to get a release signed, that maybe the photographs can never be sold to any third parties or something like that?

I do not get the full picture..  Did you sign a release?   If not he can look at them and that is about it..    A release from him -- for what purpose????   As you say he has given you some sort of image..     You may be the nice person and suggest that you will aprove images on an individual basis,  for his portfolio use.

Personally as a long time professional I would never have gotten into a situation like this...

WillSpringfield wrote:

haha i dont sneak  peeks at junk... i ell models...


SHOW ME!

He really does.

2 weekends ago:

Will "Get naked and go in the bathroom."

Me "What?"

Will "And pick out some heels"

MelissaLynnette LaDiva wrote:
He really does.

2 weekends ago:

Will "Get naked and go in the bathroom."

Me "What?"

Will "And pick out some heels"

followed by me walking into the room saying "Don't ya'll get comfortable putting on clothes."  Go stand over there and let Will molest you"

Gone Til  Novus-ember wrote:

followed by me walking into the room saying "Don't ya'll get comfortable putting on clothes."  Go stand over there and let Will molest you"

Exactly.

Oh, by the way.  I regret that.  Take those pics down please. 

MelissaLynnette LaDiva wrote:

Exactly.

Oh, by the way.  I regret that.  Take those pics down please. 

Eat a dick.

CGI Images wrote:

Yeah "dude" I get what your saying, I'm saying its the context that matters not the "what" so much.   

A cheesy "thong" shot is more "negative" when it comes to art than a tasteful nude. 

And really if you want to see my "bank account" so bad and the opportunity comes up for you, look, enjoy, giggle if you will.  But its not going to destroy my life like so many delicate flowers going on about it here.

So in whatever context the "bank account" is shown, or for however and whatever reasons people enjoy seeing "bank accounts", its not the most horrible freaking thing in the world.

Hey, I dont want to see your bank account.  I want to see hers like every other guy, LOL.  And you're right, its not the worst thing in the world anymore than exposing your hoohoo.  Still, people get weirded out about it.

Ed Burns Photography wrote:
Dear Miss Santos,

     We regret to inform you that you have not been chosen as one of the contestants on the next installment of "Flavor of Love 5: This Time I'm REALLY Seriously Gonna' Find My Truly Romantical Mate" with Flavor Flav.  It has come to our attention that you once posed for what we've determined to be scandalous images.  As you know, the Flavor of Love franchise represents wholesome, family oriented viewing, so we do not want to have our reputation affected by actors of low moral character.  We're sure you'll understand.

Regards,

VH-1

P.S.  Don't bother applying for Bret Michael's "Rock of Love 7: Cure for the Itch and Genital Warts", we run that show as well.


Oh yeah...I could see how this could sink someone's career.

LOLLERCOPTER!!!

Jessalyn wrote:
You are upset because you are going into acting and don't want those photos to surface later.

I'm curious then, what if these photos surfaced? They include nudity or implied nudity.

https://www.modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pic … id=4892657

https://www.modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pic … id=6998908

American prudes see it all the same.

Miss Anna Evans wrote:
In light of the fact that this 18+ photo is in your portfolio, I find this thread to be ironic, to put it lightly.

Scary-Ellen wrote:
I'm not reading any further into this thread.......Anna hit the nail on the head...............

While yes Anna DID hit the nail on the head, I wonder why HER post made you cease reading this thread but mine did not, when mine came before hers and says the same thing.

?

Jessalyn wrote:

LOLLERCOPTER!!!

eyenorite?

i choked on my whopper.  the king would not be happy with this....

Gone Til  Novus-ember wrote:

Eat a dick.

I remember you saying that to me too.

N i c o l e-  Alter Ego wrote:
i regret eating the whopper, fries and sprite i just had....

but only because those fuckers forgot to put the cheese on my sammich.

We must have been at the same Burger King!

The_N_Word  wrote:

We must have been at the same Burger King!

And you were seen there.