Raechl wrote:

sometimes I have planes land on my face.

LOLOLOL

its ok, he luffs you

Dave Randall wrote:
I also will add what a great time I had.  Thanks Raechl!  Had a good time even when I wasn't shooting, talking with people.  Only one request for next time.  A little less wind please.  lol

Oh I love windy days (maybe that's a carryover from being a landscape shooter?)

People stay indoors on windy days, so there are fewer gawkers. Wind blows hair and flags and long dresses/skirts dramatically...

Although I did sacrifice a battery pack for my flashes, when the wind caught my umbrella and tipped the lightstand over. I bent the umbrella back into shape so that pack (fairly cheap used, and I have extras) was the only casualty.

Lumigraphics wrote:
Oh I love windy days (maybe that's a carryover from being a landscape shooter?)

People stay indoors on windy days, so there are fewer gawkers. Wind blows hair and flags and long dresses/skirts dramatically...

Although I did sacrifice a battery pack for my flashes, when the wind caught my umbrella and tipped the lightstand over. I bent the umbrella back into shape so that pack (fairly cheap used, and I have extras) was the only casualty.

The wind put some sand in my Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS Lens.  Which is not only an expensive fix, but its my favorite lens, which I'll be without for the next 2-3 weeks :-(

Zach Sutton Photography wrote:

The wind put some sand in my Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS Lens.  Which is not only an expensive fix, but its my favorite lens, which I'll be without for the next 2-3 weeks :-(

Ouch. But you know, if you used Nikon...

Lumigraphics wrote:

Ouch. But you know, if you used Nikon...

Yeah, if I shot Nikon, it wouldnt have been a big deal because I'd be using subpar equipment to begin with   :-P :-P

At least I wasn't using Sony, right Dave?

Zach Sutton Photography wrote:

Yeah, if I shot Nikon, it wouldnt have been a big deal because I'd be using subpar equipment to begin with   :-P :-P

At least I wasn't using Sony, right Dave?

Next time I'll bring my Mamiya gear for you to drool over

Lumigraphics wrote:

Yes'm! It was great to have you there, pretty lady

I am SO looking forward to doing some underwater pics with you too!

Oh for sure!!

And I get to work with you at DEAC !

f11photography wrote:
Jamm
Since I can't get the photo to post, here is the link:
https://www.modelmayhem.com/pic.php?pic … up_id=&ua=

She's wonderful isn't she?

Nlygia Roge wrote:

Oh for sure!!

And I get to work with you at DEAC !

I'm the lucky one there!

Nlygia Roge wrote:

Oh for sure!!

And I get to work with you at DEAC !

And I get to work with you at DEAC, too!!! *giddiness*

Lumigraphics wrote:

She's wonderful isn't she?

I'm in complete agreement with you.

tipmuskegon wrote:
I would like to know how this is nude.  There is more skin showing in the bathing suite models that are posted. I violated no ones trust.  This is a very tastful portrait with nothing showing.  If you think this is nude then you need to get a life.

Implied nudity was counted as nudity in the agreement. you are violating a rule that was in-forced in the contracts we had everyone sign.

Here is an excerpt from the actual contract;

"I, [your name here] hereby declare that I will abide by all the rules whether verbal or written that are made by anyone involved with either Rachel Andre or the Rosemont. This includes but is not limited to the following; nudity of any sort or kind- this involves implied or full nudity; going into parts of the establishment which are declared “off-limits” or restricted for any reason by the owners- I will make sure to ask the hosts which areas this pertains to, if any..."

Phil Mc wrote:
I've added a few photos from the Rosemont shoot to my MM profile

Very cool

Lumigraphics wrote:

Chelsea (CNyle)

Aww! I look so pretty and the colors worked awesomely!

CNyle wrote:
Aww! I look so pretty and the colors worked awesomely!

That's the perfect pose for you, we had the good one from our first session with the XBox that was about the same pose

And yes the colors are great!

Raechl wrote:

LOL where is my nose in that picture?! XD

hey! i have that same necklace.. well 3 of them.. from Aldo.. the aids supporty ones?

Nina AnnMarie wrote:

hey! i have that same necklace.. well 3 of them.. from Aldo.. the aids supporty ones?

yeah, it's my fiance's. I have just permanently taken it.

StarryNight Photography wrote:
Okay, okay....here's one of Raechl, with nose still intact.

yay, my nose!

terrysphoto wrote:



ok   1 more

Oh I like it! Cassie is a hottie

I gotta drag her over here to shoot with me a third time