Longwatcher wrote:

Thanks,
And I may let them pet it, but I keep it in my hand so it doesn't get loose.
Favorite part is it is serial #00002 (#1 is reported to be in the Hassy Museum)
Long story how I got it, but all legitimate.

I'd pay nearly $6000 for Neil Armstrong's Lunar!

Fred Greissing wrote:
It apears that Hasselblad management has no idea of the Luxury world.
First problem is they think that their brand has some sort of broad value.
Outside of pro photography and serious enthusiasts it has virtually no recognition.

I've been into photography for five years, and I've never spent $1000 on a camera.

But, as far back as I can remember, Hasselblad has been an iconic name.  Twenty, maybe thirty years, for me.