Dahvid Neal wrote:
Hmm I'm curious!

I'd love to do a standing nude like this. Although I would have a little more light.

https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/0 … 2b1846.jpg

Cecilia Or wrote:
Please take a look. Thank you for your consideration.

I'd pick this one. I like the palette, although I'd some warm highlights to you to bring you out from the background more.

Terrell Gates wrote:
I would love to know...

There's some wonderful posing in your portfolio, but almost all of it is against a black background. It works well for photography, but I think paintings require background/context--even it's very simple.

Brittany Waldron wrote:
Ill play

I'd pick either of these two. I like the composition of both a lot.

Becky Ward wrote:
I'm curious...Me please!!

Becky x

This one could be really classic looking with a more medieval looking dress and some gilding.

juliarabkin wrote:

For sure this one. The expression. The figure and the fingers and the folds!

Cynthia Serrano  wrote:
Curious?

Maybe a strange pick, but I think this could work well in a loose, illustrative style.

a different brian wrote:
hmm... which, indeed?

This is a really attractive profile. I like how her hair falls, but you can still tell the shape of her face.

Marin Photography NYC wrote:
Shoot!

I like this one quite a bit, although I'd have to add a context. I wish a little more of her figure were evident beneath the fabric as well.

Ann77 wrote:
Me! 

Yours is challenging. There's some good stuff, but not stuff that's necessarily good for painting. However I really like the concept of this one, with your figure behind the sheer and the eye makeup in similar colors. I'd rather have you look away and there'd have to be some sort of background.

Maruschke wrote:
I would love to know

Blah blah, background and context. And now I get to contradict myself: this would work as is. Large. I mean huge.

_MIA wrote:
What an awesome idea! Please?

I love your hair in a lot these. I'd choose this one. The pose is cool but would be impossible to hold for painting. However I wouldn't wash out the colors so much. I also wouldn't crop so tight so I could get your entire figure in the work.

Brittani Harrell wrote:
Have at it. I love to paint!

I'd choose this one. But it's a good example of something that makes a decent photograph that doesn't necessarily make a good painting. It's also a good example of why using photographs for references is not as good as a live subject.

Because the lighting is so even, your face would register as very flat in a painting. There's very little light and shadow to contour your face. It's also impossible to register subtle color differences that would provide contour to your face in such even light.

Lastly your foot is out of focus because of the very shallow DOF. Fine for a photograph, but I think having it in focus would "complete" the figure of a painting and give the whole thing more depth.

KayVee Photography wrote:
lets play

Honestly these are all pretty vanilla images. Sorry.

Darious Watson wrote:
I would like to know

I would pick this one. Again, I'd warm up your colors to pull you out of the background. And I would probably put some silhouettes in the tunnel/light to add some interest and story.

Jacky Francis wrote:
I'd definitely love to know

This could be interesting with a little more light. It'd be fun to render the various colors tinting your skin tones.

Lady Gigi wrote:
Sure! .

Nothing is striking me. Sorry.

Maria J Campos wrote:
Still doing this?

Isn't it obvious? Headpieces FTW. I really like your pose and neckline.

Lumatic wrote:
If you ever get your computer back, I'm curious!

You have some really strong stuff. I especially like the ones with more than one model.

I'd pick this one. I really like the palette and love the idea of full body portraits. I would kill myself trying to paint that shirt.

ArtisticallySexy wrote:
Is this going? I would love to know

Not really my style. Sorry.

Jeylie VasRam wrote:
One of mine, please.

You have some nice photos, but I can't find one I'd use for a painting. Sorry.