Mousseline wrote:
when your shredding a man of his minuscule masculinity?

Maybe this?

Mousseline wrote:
when your shredding a man of his minuscule masculinity?

If he's sobbing or curled in a fetal position you might be close.

Lack of confidence or humiliation is often reflected in weak or indirect eye contact.

If his libido has been neutralized or he can't get an erection, that might be another indication.

---

Do you mean shredding his masculinity? Ouch!

Mousseline wrote:
well, as far as women are concerned he's biologically incompetent.

and ya know what they say about opinions being like assholes?

Mousseline wrote:
well, as far as women are concerned he's biologically incompetent.

What does that mean?

Risen Phoenix Photo wrote:
What does that mean?

She wasn't satisfied, and it's all his fault.

Risen Phoenix Photo wrote:

What does that mean?

Think hard, I'm sure you do know.

Mousseline wrote:
when your shredding a man of his minuscule masculinity?

Ask him if he's become a disciple of the red-piller or MGTOW religions, and thinks any woman with an opinion is a feminazi. If he says yes, then SUCCESS.

If not, then keep shredding... all miniscule masculinities get there eventually.

Majuscule masculinities, however, can take all the shredding you can dish out.

Patrick Walberg wrote:
When he looks like this .....

Is that you, Kickfight?

MoRina wrote:
Is that you, Kickfight?

Yeah, right. Not even! Maybe 20-25 years ago? Also, way too much shoe.

kickfight wrote:

Yeah, right. Not even! Maybe 20-25 years ago? Also, way too much shoe.

Koryn wrote:
It is your responsibility to SHOW your lover what you like and how to please you.

the person in question would be completely incompetent of doing any such thing.

Frank Lewis Photography wrote:
What is the purpose of this thread?

That MUST be a rhetorical question...

Mousseline wrote:

the person in question would be completely incompetent of doing any such thing.

I agree.
Then again, I've never been put in that situation - you know, where I'd have to give instructions.

I'd imagine it would go like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkWJwFrDpHs

Jules NYC wrote:
I'd imagine it would go like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkWJwFrDpHs

I miss the original 2.5 Men episodes with Charlie... those were the best!

Btw., Alan is a stand-in for some of the people and attitudes  I am always talking about... he has sex, he even has kinky sex... but he is so uptight to the outside that he is so uncomfortable to talk to Jake without being embarrassed and has to use euphemism...

The show was so successful, because people of both sides of the prudery-line could identify with either character... just brilliant!   

udor wrote:

I miss the original 2.5 Men with Charlie... were the best!

Btw., Alan is a stand-in for some of the people and attitudes  I am always talking about... he has sex, he even has kinky sex... but he is so uptight to the outside that he is so uncomfortable to talk about Jake without being embarrassed and has to use euphemism...

The show was so successful, because people of both sides of the prudery-line could identify with ether character... just brilliant!   

Prudery line.

Jules NYC wrote:

Do you spend all your time looking for these things?   

Jerry Nemeth wrote:

Do you spend all your time looking for these things?   

I'm an IT 'guy'; it takes merely sexonds.

Frank Lewis Photography wrote:
What is the purpose of this thread?

its mousaline venting after her date threw her out of the car on the side of the highway.

sorry tiff

The F-Stop wrote:
its mousaline venting after her date threw her out of the car on the side of the highway.

sorry tiff

This person would never be a date. Message me for more info, I'd get brigged if I gave you details here