Connor Photography wrote:
I am a photographer and proud GWC, GWC with strobes, GWC with strobes and 200,000 ft^2 studio and GWC with lot of Money. 

Who cares? 

Obviously you cannot read. Please have someone read #1 out loud to you. 

GWC WITH small p%#^s since you need to brag about your alleged wallet.

I would LOVE to see your 200,000 sq ft studio, that would be3+ acres under the roof. Or roughly the size of 2 Home Depots.

IBG  wrote:
okay, I'll play.  Art is, however, in the eye of the beholder lol.

Art may be in the eye of the beholder, it just is NOT in your photos.
GWPW

EbbysTouch wrote:
I'm GWC but let's play:)

oh please, but I am at least glad to see "Girl With Camera"

Images by Philippe wrote:
I'll take the harsh feedback

For you, I'll add to my original post:

#6 if you MM name starts with "Images by.." or "The Art of..." read #3


GWC

come on please somebody out there show me a real photo, designed, lit, thought about.

Ashley LaShea  wrote:
I'm a girl with camera. a camera I love and cherish. Its my secret lover. :-P but I'll play with u.... Shhhhhhh.

damn, its "Girl with" day as in "Girl With Paper Weight"

stop please, no really

Miracle_Man wrote:
Sure I'm in!  Tell me what you think and be brutally honest!

I was praying for a miracle of one decent photographer, sorry not your day.

GWC

David Pollack wrote:

For you, I'll add to my original post:

#6 if you MM name starts with "Images by.." or "The Art of..." read #3

Just thinking that "... Photography"  is no better. 


"GWC" designation is fine for now. Still learning and working on it.

Triple M Studios wrote:
I don't usually do these, but . . .

and I wish you didn't usually take out your camera.

worst GWC so far.

Paul Tirado Photography wrote:
Take a look and let me know. Thanks.

HOORAY, THANK YOU, YES

Okay, now every one else above take a look at Mr. Tirados photos, they have been well lit, they are thought out, they are styles, they have proper post production.

PHOTOGRAPHER

again, this is NOT about anyones "shots" it is about the professionalism of them

THANKS!!!!!!

Lars R Peterson wrote:
OK, Dave. I'll play...
Photographer, GWC, GWPW, or GWSP?

Uh, oh. I do have a babe with a sword...

Oh god, yet another.

GWPW, please put down the camera.

by the way, I guess we have NOT met, nobody I know calls me Dave. I am not bothered by it, just amused. Shall I call you Larry, Lar, La?

nodakphoto wrote:
Hit me

GWCWP (guy with camera with possibility) You could be a photographer, there is a sence of design, some inate understanding of light, but it is clear what you want in front of your camera.

David Pollack wrote:

HOORAY, THANK YOU, YES

Okay, now every one else above take a look at Mr. Tirados photos, they have been well lit, they are thought out, they are styles, they have proper post production.

PHOTOGRAPHER

again, this is NOT about anyones "shots" it is about the professionalism of them

THANKS!!!!!!

Thank you for the compliment. I find when going through proofs of all my shoots that I think close 95% of my shots kinda suck. The key is to know what those 5% with potential are...oh and don't let anyone else see that other 95%. lol.

F u t u r a Photography wrote:
thoughts please

damn, I can't give you s GWC no hot sweating babes; no giant swords, convertibles or motorcycles; no girls kissing. Keep on shooting.



No rating

Wait, I have it, Future Photographer

Matrix Photos wrote:
game on...

easy to seperate those who view it as a profession from those who view it as a game.

GWC (gamer with camera)

End of the Road Studio wrote:
first time at this game - have fun

I hate to quote myself but will:

easy to seperate those who view it as a profession from those who view it as a game.

GWC (gamer with camera)

Paul Tirado Photography wrote:
Thank you for the compliment. I find when going through proofs of all my shoots that I think close 95% of my shots kinda suck. The key is to know what those 5% with potential are...oh and don't let anyone else see that other 95%. lol.

Then you are even better than I expected, I would hope that 99% of what you shoot more than sucks. You are absolutely correct, no one cares what you throw out, just what they see.

David Pollack wrote:

damn, I can't give you s GWC no hot sweating babes; no giant swords, convertibles or motorcycles; no girls kissing. Keep on shooting.



No rating

Wait, I have it, Future Photographer

Thanks, enjoying this side of photography but not good enough to give up the day job!