Forums > General Industry > Short Models?

Wardrobe Stylist

cara crass styling

Posts: 1249

Boston, Massachusetts, US

Brian Diaz wrote:

They don't make samples in their sizes, so they don't hire short models.

(Plus they've found that taller models sell clothes better.  So what ya gonna do?)

there are a FEW exceptions to this, but it is VERY few. so yah, pretty much this rule.

FASHION is all about that, the FASHION.

Jun 07 10 06:07 am Link

Model

Cindy Holiday

Posts: 314

Charlotte, North Carolina, US

cara crass styling wrote:
there are a FEW exceptions to this, but it is VERY few. so yah, pretty much this rule.

FASHION is all about that, the FASHION.

I'm 5'5" and have done fashion work. I was selected for an 8-page fashion spread for a magazine where they were incorporating a vintage look with fetish accessories. I fit the bill perfectly. The fashion designer loved my curves so much that he's used me in many of his clothes for his website and wants to use me in a fashion show. His clothes were made for taller girls, but I wear high heels and look great in them.

This doesn't happen often and I think networking is a big thing. I know a couple shorter models that have done runway. One was for Jean Paul Gaultier, and it was after merely being introduced to him.

Jun 07 10 06:17 am Link

Model

-NNY-

Posts: 598

Sacramento, California, US

Lapis wrote:
short women look better naked.

Haha i love this

Jun 07 10 07:09 pm Link

Model

-NNY-

Posts: 598

Sacramento, California, US

If fashion designers made clothes from short models they would be saving a lot of fabric!

Jun 07 10 07:12 pm Link

Model

Mischa Marie

Posts: 7892

Sacramento, California, US

Brian Diaz wrote:

According to www.newmodels.com, which is written by an expert on the industry, the average female commercial print model is 5'6 3/4".

Score!!!! Thats me!

Jun 07 10 07:15 pm Link

Model

Dina Ova

Posts: 174

Arlington, Virginia, US

i think it all depends on how you look

Jun 07 10 07:16 pm Link

Model

MichelleM

Posts: 189

Jacksonville, Florida, US

That's why I make all of my dresses.  5'5" is a hard place to be smile

Jun 07 10 08:28 pm Link

Photographer

Lucas Chapman

Posts: 6129

Scottsdale, Arizona, US

Mayae wrote:
I agree you will probably never see short models doing runway or high fashion work. However there are many short models who find work in the commercial print market.

I was gonna ask you to name one.. then noticed your profile is gone... lol

Jun 07 10 08:32 pm Link

Photographer

Lucas Chapman

Posts: 6129

Scottsdale, Arizona, US

Nicole Nygaard wrote:
If fashion designers made clothes from short models they would be saving a lot of fabric!

...but selling a lot less clothes.  Not a good exchange

Jun 07 10 08:33 pm Link

Model

-NNY-

Posts: 598

Sacramento, California, US

Lucas Chapman wrote:

...but selling a lot less clothes.  Not a good exchange

I think they would make more money if they had both small and tall sizes.

Jun 07 10 08:36 pm Link

Model

Z A N Z A N

Posts: 2861

York Harbour, Guam, US

Nicole Nygaard wrote:
I think they would make more money if they had both small and tall sizes.

But then they just x2 their amount of fabric for samples. Ready to wear features many sizes for all ranges of women, but for the first garment, a sample is made. Whatever this size is going to be, it's going to be the same for all other samples. It could be a XXXL it could be a XS and hemmed for short models or it could be a S 0/1 with the length for tall models. Designers (clients) have found what works to sell their clothes (tall models), that's where the money is for them, so until they want to change it, nothing will change. It's just how it is. Models, photographers, muas, and hairstylists don't have a lot of say in the matter, but the first clients that hire all these people do. These are the fashion designers.

Oh and Pixie we need to shoot this thread in the head. It's the only way to kill a zombie. wink

Jun 07 10 08:53 pm Link

Photographer

Christine Eadie

Posts: 2614

Charleston, South Carolina, US

Steve Campbell wrote:
...this area is getting swamped with model from 5 ft. to 5.5 or so.
Are these models finding work othen then the nude glamour market?

Same here. Most models in this area are under 5'6".
I prefer taller models, though I might shoot beauty with a shorter model.
I doubt they're finding work outside of nude/glamour because there aren't that many jobs around here to begin with.

Jun 08 10 05:20 am Link

Model

Klarrissa

Posts: 2322

Los Angeles, California, US

What I find strange is that when a new short model joins and asks what shoots they could do, people tell them fashion is out. Yeah maybe in the real world but on MM photographers shoot short models for fashion all the time...I wonder why that is?
Might as well just tell the models that on MM they can actually shoot whatever they like, majority don't take stats into account, unless they are a true fashion/editorial photographer and even then they make exceptions sometimes.

Jun 08 10 05:24 am Link

Photographer

Enfire Photography

Posts: 1488

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US

Klarrissa wrote:
What I find strange is that when a new short model joins and asks what shoots they could do, people tell them fashion is out. Yeah maybe in the real world but on MM photographers shoot short models for fashion all the time...I wonder why that is?
Might as well just tell the models that on MM they can actually shoot whatever they like, majority don't take stats into account, unless they are a true fashion/editorial photographer and even then they make exceptions sometimes.

shh don't make sense

Jun 08 10 06:40 am Link

Model

Ivana-

Posts: 4

Sarasota, Florida, US

The fashion world is so corrupt and obsessed with extremley tall and skeletal women, because "they look best in the clothes and sell them better"? You know what? The reality is, most of the population is full of averaged height women with average healthy weights. Designers would make a heck of a lot more money if they made apparel that suited  them, rather the latter. But then again, the high fashion garments don't come cheap, and are stuck with a fancy price tag, so i guess they have no reason to be open minded about using shorter women for runway on the catwalk since it wouldn't make a difference.

I despise people who ostracize averaged height models because they don't think they are good enough for certain work.

Sheeeeesh.

Oct 11 10 12:18 am Link

Photographer

Lucas Chapman

Posts: 6129

Scottsdale, Arizona, US

Glamour Boulevard wrote:
I dont see how a short girl cant get fashion work and such. dont short people wear clothes too,lol. there has to be fashion work for short people out there.

Nope, there isn't, and there won't be, any more than there will be a NBA team of 5'6" players

Oct 11 10 12:19 am Link

Photographer

Lucas Chapman

Posts: 6129

Scottsdale, Arizona, US

Armina  wrote:
The fashion world is so corrupt and obsessed with extremley tall and skeletal women, because "they look best in the clothes and sell them better"? You know what? Th reality is, most of the population is full of averaged height women with average healthy weights. Designers would make a heck of a lot more money if they made apparel that suited  them, rather the latter. But then again, the high fashion garments don't come cheap, and are stuck with a fancy price tag, so i guess they have no reason to be open minded about using shorter women for runway on the catwalk since it wouldn't make a difference.

I despise people who ostracize averaged height models because they don't think they are good enough for certain work.

Sheeeeesh.

Honey, the fashion world is neither corrupt nor obsessed... its ALWAYS been that way, and its not going to change cause shorties stamp their little feet.

Oct 11 10 12:21 am Link

Model

Ivana-

Posts: 4

Sarasota, Florida, US

Lucas Chapman wrote:
Honey, the fashion world is neither corrupt nor obsessed... its ALWAYS been that way, and its not going to change cause shorties stamp their little feet.

Yes I'm aware, and it should change.

Oct 11 10 12:23 am Link

Model

Jade Vixen

Posts: 113

New York, New York, US

At 5'5", I am a full time model and do just fine, but I don't try to be a fashion/runway model. I just stick with what pays my bills and what I enjoy, which is latex fetish fashion and glamour nudes.

Oct 11 10 11:25 am Link

Model

Helen Perry

Posts: 54

Burnley, England, United Kingdom

I'm 5'4 - teeny weeny - but it's not going to stop me.

So what if we can't do fashion and runway proffessionally? As someone mentioned earlier - we can work with hundreds of togs who would enjoy a 'Fashion' shoot smile

Also - Redheads DO rule!

Oct 11 10 12:34 pm Link

Model

K Allende

Posts: 14172

Columbus, Ohio, US

I'm five foot and only do nude work, on top of not being tall enough for fashion, I'm not thin enough and couldn't have the super-model body even if I lost 20 pounds because of the body type I have.

I'm not too interested in doing glamour and don't have a good look for that genre in the first place.

Arts nudes is where it's at for me.

Oct 11 10 12:54 pm Link

Model

Helen Perry

Posts: 54

Burnley, England, United Kingdom

Isabel Allende wrote:
I'm five foot and only do nude work, on top of not being tall enough for fashion, I'm not thin enough and couldn't have the super-model body even if I lost 20 pounds because of the body type I have.

I'm not too interested in doing glamour and don't have a good look for that genre in the first place.

Arts nudes is where it's at for me.

+1

-If it gets to the point where I REALLY want to pursue Modelling as a career, I know I could go for glamour/nudes and POSSIBLY Commericial work.
Nowhere near experienced enough to do anything at the moment though!

Oct 11 10 12:56 pm Link

Model

Serpentine

Posts: 57

Jersey City, New Jersey, US

Does anybody have any pointers they could give me on getting into commercial/print work? I am 5'4". I find that the most difficult part about modeling is actually finding the opportunities...

Oct 11 10 09:18 pm Link

Model

MissSybarite

Posts: 11863

Los Angeles, California, US

Serpentine wrote:
Does anybody have any pointers they could give me on getting into commercial/print work? I am 5'4". I find that the most difficult part about modeling is actually finding the opportunities...

I think you should aim for beauty, glamour/swimsuit, and parlay into fitness.
As well continue doing various types of nudes, since you're very comfortable doing them.

Oct 11 10 09:37 pm Link

Model

Serpentine

Posts: 57

Jersey City, New Jersey, US

Miss Anthrope 1007 wrote:

I think you should aim for beauty, glamour/swimsuit, and parlay into fitness.
As well continue doing various types of nudes, since you're very comfortable doing them.

Thank you for your advice. It's not so much that I don't know which genres could be a selling point to me, I just don't know how to find the opportunities. I suppose I mean to ask how do models actually get work? Go around contacting fashion designers? catalogues? Is there a good website with casting calls that you don't have to pay to view?

Oct 12 10 12:19 am Link

Model

Rhose Rhomalina

Posts: 199

Saint Louis, Missouri, US

short models= less fabric
tall models= possibly the same amount or more fabric
????

Oct 12 10 12:25 am Link

Photographer

Matt Dunn

Posts: 229

Miami, Florida, US

There is a market for short models called glamour models.  High fashion starts at 5'9" and goes up.  Get over it and realize the realities.
https://www.mattdunn.com/data/photos/193_1KateMiami.jpg

Oct 12 10 07:35 pm Link

Model

Big A-Larger Than Life

Posts: 33451

The Woodlands, Texas, US

Lapis wrote:
short women look better naked.

cool

Oct 12 10 07:38 pm Link

Model

Skunk The Gutterpunk

Posts: 771

Red Bank, New Jersey, US

Up until recently (dam*ed effed up hormones) I was a short model. I found some work, but not much. I can't wait till I finish up puberty

Oct 12 10 07:38 pm Link

Photographer

Lucas Chapman

Posts: 6129

Scottsdale, Arizona, US

Mayae wrote:
I agree you will probably never see short models doing runway or high fashion work. However there are many short models who find work in the commercial print market.

Name me a few, would you???

Oct 12 10 07:40 pm Link

Photographer

Lucas Chapman

Posts: 6129

Scottsdale, Arizona, US

Armina  wrote:

Yes I'm aware, and it should change.

...it won't.  wink

Oct 12 10 07:41 pm Link

Model

California Dreamer

Posts: 707

Atlanta, Georgia, US

Nothings Impossible

https://i664.photobucket.com/albums/vv3/Dreamer_2_photos/1000123.jpg

Oct 12 10 08:37 pm Link

Photographer

Lucas Chapman

Posts: 6129

Scottsdale, Arizona, US

Moraxian wrote:
I've worked with ladies with varying heights from 4' 10" tall all the way up to 6' 0" tall.  (And when I say 4' 10", Tammy was that if she wore 2 inch heels...)  There is no reason a lady who is under 5' 10" can't be a model for any number of things, even runway...

For a "fashion show" at the mall in Nowheresville, maybe.  In the real world?  One reason is all they need.

Oct 12 10 08:42 pm Link

Photographer

Lucas Chapman

Posts: 6129

Scottsdale, Arizona, US

California Dreamer wrote:
Nothings Impossible

https://i664.photobucket.com/albums/vv3/Dreamer_2_photos/1000123.jpg

What news stands is this magazine commonly found on?

Oct 12 10 08:43 pm Link

Photographer

Dark Shadows

Posts: 2269

Miami, Florida, US

In my area shorter models can do promo type work, the occasional freelance job for a small business, or shoot nudes with GWCs (which is the most lucrative of the three).

Occasionally you will see a (stunning) shorter model shoot for a Men's magazine or some other publication, but she is very likely doing it for free (working for tears) or for a very low fee.

Modeling is not friendly to petite models. If I had a friend that was shorter ask me to be honest about her chances to 'make it' as a model, I would tell her to try acting. In other words, the chances are not very good.

Oct 12 10 08:51 pm Link

Model

California Dreamer

Posts: 707

Atlanta, Georgia, US

Lucas Chapman wrote:

What news stands is this magazine commonly found on?

Its a brand New Magazine ,first edition comes out in January!!

Oct 12 10 08:52 pm Link

Photographer

Julian W I L D E

Posts: 1831

Portland, Oregon, US

Honestly, some of the best nude models(or "Body Models" as I like to say) are actually in the 5'4 to 5'6 range.  Something about the proportions work better at that height.

In My Opinion,  -JULIAN

Oct 12 10 08:54 pm Link

Photographer

Sophistocles

Posts: 21320

Seattle, Washington, US

As far as I can tell, it's just a web site run on Wordpress.

It's going to be an actual print magazine with national distribution in January? Got an ISSN number for it? I'd very much like to make sure my local stand carries it.

Wow! Harsh! From this magazine's web site:

One of the most misleading model-oriented websites on the internet is called Model Mayhem.  Please beware they are a great example of the worst kind of  site, where model hopefuls create a “portfolio” to be seen by other members of the site ranging from photographers to photoshop wizards. Though this may sound like a reasonable way to make your mark in the modeling industry, it’s not.  This is simply a website that takes advantage of those hoping to break into the fashion and entertainment industry through enticing subscribers with paid memberships to view your photos.

Seriously?

Yes, apparently so:

Who are these so-called important people viewing your graphics?  What you need to know is that Model Mayhem does not allow casting directors, publishers, model and talent agents or advertising agencies to join and those are the individuals you need to be seen by to get real work as a model.

If you read the fine print on Model Mayhem you will find that it is for “entertainment purposes only!”  Oh, how entertaining it is.  There are plenty of amateur photographers and models posting sexually graphic content on a daily basis.  Peter Baratti, a thirty year industry fashion photographer, says, “Model Mayhem has destroyed the meaning of what a real model is and it has made every girl feel like she can be a model because her pictures are posted.”  Peter goes on to say, “Model Mayhem is a known dating website and is a sexual predators dream to entice women to take their clothes off, all in the pursuit of becoming a model.”


There is more, but this is a sufficient excerpt, presented here under fair use (so mods, no copyright infringement happening) for review and commentary.

My review: looks like they want to scare people into trusting them.

My commentary: Wow.

My analysis: If Internet Brands's legal department isn't putting together a letter noting a serious threat of libel, I'd be very surprised. And disappointed.

The author, Angela Philips, might want to be a little concerned about this, especially when she then comments on her own online article:

I am so glad you ladies read the article! The only way we can stop scam sites is by getting the truth out about them! Bella Petite is here for YOU! We will work hard to continue to bring you relevant content that you need and want! Getting 1 million women to join Bella Petite is the BEST way for us to CHANGE THE INDUSTRY!!!

Scam sites? Model Mayhem is a scam site? Those are pretty tough words. Actionable, too.

Another comment by "Rita" says:

I thought everyone new Model Mayhem was a JOKE! Total SCAM! Bad news for wannabe models! You can get in real trouble on a scummy site like that one. Hats of to Bella for putting the warning out.

Now call me suspicious, but all five comments by first-name people are about the same length and read at about the same pacing and level. You don't think they're fake comments, do you?

As someone who runs another portfolio site that is for "entertainment" (if by "entertainment" you mean hobbyists are welcome and networking is the goal), this kind of disparaging verbiage about the industry directly concerns me. I hope it concerns you, too.

Oct 12 10 09:33 pm Link

Photographer

picturephoto

Posts: 8687

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Five years of hilarious nonsense crammed into a mere three pages.  Best zombie thread ever!

borat

Oct 12 10 09:47 pm Link

Photographer

RiverGrizzly

Posts: 692

Charlottesville, Virginia, US

This thread suffers from sloppy terminology. "Fashion" is usually assumed to mean haut couture or high fasion editorial and runway. Think Fashion Week in NY, Paris and Milan. For that you have to be tall because the designers only make "sample" sizes. That size is not negotiable. The designer makes a dozen or more creations, all the same size, then finds models to wear them. How would it be practical for the runway debut of a line for the designer to make a bunch of different sizes in anticipation of models from 5' 4" to 6' 0" showing up for auditions the day before the show?

This part of the industry is very elite for everyone involved, the models, designers, photographers, muas etc. Being offended by the long-estabilshed standards is childish.

You can model for a catalog for "ready to wear" clothing and although you may consider that "fashion" it is not the same thing as haute couture. But at least you can be shorter for this.

Many, many shorter models do runway work but they do it for local designers, department stores, charity events etc. where the event organizers cannot afford NY Fashion Week type models or ready to wear garments are available. This is not haute couture in NY, Paris or Milan or posing for Vogue.

There is a lot more work out there other than haute couture runway and editorial. However, there is a lot of competition in commercial work with tall models who don't have the "look" agencies want for runway work.

So, if you are shorter, your best shot is glamour, commercial, nudes etc. as others here have said.

My only explanation for the great number of shorter models is that "short" is really average and a) most of the models don't realize how the industry works and b) they are not interested in standard agency-related modeling but are looking to do glamour, nudes, alt and other genres more popular on the internet.

BTW, agency fashion models are not typically anorexic. They are just tall and thin. Think Watusi versus Inuit, basketball vs. weight lifting.

John ==

Oct 12 10 09:50 pm Link