Photographer
Lumigraphics
Posts: 32780
Detroit, Michigan, US
Cori Lady wrote:
i have had some offers to be in a nude or langere or even a naked nude drawings. It happens alot for younger girls and i am not surprised but some phtogs should be more careful when asking younger girls to do so.
 Also understand that many of us have done nude work with models who clearly say "no nudes" on their profiles. Some models actually WILL do nude work with the photographers of their choosing, just not everyone. Same goes for "no TFCD" postings. Just because a profile says it doesn't mean its always true.
Model
Sophia Stardust Model
Posts: 4762
Ann Arbor, Michigan, US
When I was 17, I got asked a lot, despite my age AND saying don't even ask me about nudes. Photographers either don't pay attention, or don't care. Trust me, for a lot of models, even if they are underage, it's more than necessary.
Model
Casey Love
Posts: 1
Wausau, Wisconsin, US
ei Total Productions wrote:
I find that a little bit disturbing. Maybe some of the younger models who have that can tell us why they felt it was necessary. I am 16, my profile says so, but I could show you at least 3 messages asking me to do nudes.
It's not a rarity to see professional photographers ask underagers.
I wanted to make sure they saw it, that's all.
Model
Penelope P
Posts: 858
Chicago, Illinois, US
ei Total Productions wrote:
I am just curious about something. I am seeing more and more models, under 18, adding the words "No Nudes" or other similar phrases to their profiles.
My question is why would they need that? I understand why older models do, but are teen models getting that many offers for nude work that they need to make it clear they won't accept nude offers? Does that also mean that some teen models on this site are doing nude work?
Alan Most photographers don't read model profiles. Especially age (even though if you're serious and professional you should - especially if youre a nude photographer!)
It just helps weed out annoying messages and request for nude work I'm sure.
Model
Zee Dee
Posts: 195
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
I get asked from time to time. Creeps me out a bit, so I had to put no nudity in my profile.
Photographer
c_d_s
Posts: 7771
Lubbock, Texas, US
DES1208 wrote:
and you should call the cops on the dude.
The scumbag peds who shop here trolling for underage models disgust me.
Personally I think there should be a TEEN MM.. so underage models
A. Dont have access to the adult content
B. Hopefully it would curb the PED traffic here.
DES I agree, there should be no pedestrians on MM, only motorists.
Photographer
c_d_s
Posts: 7771
Lubbock, Texas, US
To answer Alan's question from nearly three years ago:
They put it in their profile for the same reason they say "Will travel with expenses paid," and "I reserve the right to bring an escort."
because they saw it on someone else's profile.
Model
aa bb cc
Posts: 93
Orange Park, Florida, US
ei Total Productions wrote:
I am just curious about something. I am seeing more and more models, under 18, adding the words "No Nudes" or other similar phrases to their profiles.
My question is why would they need that? I understand why older models do, but are teen models getting that many offers for nude work that they need to make it clear they won't accept nude offers? Does that also mean that some teen models on this site are doing nude work?
Alan I got offered for nude when i was 16, many photographers would ask me to do nude between 16 and 17, and my age was deffinatly posted(but im guessing i looked more mature than most girls where i used to live).. but i guess they overlook it..every time.. lol. so i just used to post no nudes just in case.
Oh yeah.. and i've seen 17 yearolds do nude.. or nipple showing, at this one site i new of. i just tried to look it up.. but it doesn't come up no more.. hmmm...
Model
Savvy O
Posts: 1243
New York, New York, US
I got more "nudes" requests before I turned 18 then I do now. Haha!
Photographer
myfotographer
Posts: 3700
Fresno, California, US
I think the reason is obvious. They are tired of getting asked.
It might help mom and dad sleep better at night too.
Model
Woopr111
Posts: 3974
Abercarn-Newbridge, Wales, United Kingdom
Photographer
G Anderson Photo
Posts: 18
Madison, Wisconsin, US
I have some very simple advice on this to photographers. If you shoot nudes with models (over 18), do NOT shoot with underage models under ANY circumstances.
That may sound extreme, but if you knew the cops view on this as I have experienced and heard from other photographers, you would take it seriously.
Photographer
David Shinobi
Posts: 5746
Daytona Beach, Florida, US
Someone was HELLA bored to dig up a thread started Jan 01 06 02:22 pm 
Model
Krystalle Crow Wetzlich
Posts: 82
Denver, Colorado, US
Some are talking about implied nudes, and yes, some do get offered... or that there are so many photographers with nude, or implied photos in their port, and when those photographers offer to shoot, the teens may think that, thats what the photographers are looking for.
for young people [18+] also request for no nudes cause maybe they know too many people in real life on MM that they'd rather not have them looking just yet
Photographer
American Glamour
Posts: 38813
Detroit, Michigan, US
David Shinobi wrote:
Someone was HELLA bored to dig up a thread started Jan 01 06 02:22 pm
I was thinking the same thing and this is MY thread.
Model
1193171
Posts: 462
London, England, United Kingdom
i have just turned 17.. and i look YOUNG.. i have been asked to shoot nude on countless occasions
Photographer
Greg Kolack
Posts: 18392
Elmhurst, Illinois, US
David Shinobi wrote:
Someone was HELLA bored to dig up a thread started Jan 01 06 02:22 pm
It keeps getting revived for some reason - first in July of 06, then Nov of last year, and now.
It always interests me why people search for old threads in the first place...
Model
Sasha Ann-Marie
Posts: 512
Bloomfield, Connecticut, US
ei Total Productions wrote:
I am just curious about something. I am seeing more and more models, under 18, adding the words "No Nudes" or other similar phrases to their profiles.
My question is why would they need that? I understand why older models do, but are teen models getting that many offers for nude work that they need to make it clear they won't accept nude offers? Does that also mean that some teen models on this site are doing nude work?
Alan because i am sure there are photographers who still ask them to do nudes or "implied nudes" hand bras undies... claiming its not reallllly nude.
Photographer
Greg Kolack
Posts: 18392
Elmhurst, Illinois, US
Sasha W wrote:
because i am sure there are photographers who still ask them to do nudes or "implied nudes" hand bras undies... claiming its not reallllly nude. It will be fun to see how many people reply to the very first post in this thread with checking the date or reading beyond the first post...
Photographer
David Shinobi
Posts: 5746
Daytona Beach, Florida, US
ei Total Productions wrote:
I was thinking the same thing and this is MY thread. Maybe you can give him one of those NCIS slaps in the back of the head... 
Photographer
Paul Bryson Photography
Posts: 48041
Hollywood, Florida, US
Holy shit, a 3.5 year old thread!  I think this is the record for oldest thread bumped.
Photographer
Lumigraphics
Posts: 32780
Detroit, Michigan, US
G Anderson Photo wrote:
I have some very simple advice on this to photographers. If you shoot nudes with models (over 18), do NOT shoot with underage models under ANY circumstances.
That may sound extreme, but if you knew the cops view on this as I have experienced and heard from other photographers, you would take it seriously. A. This is an OLD thread
B. You are just plain wrong.
Photographer
Mclain D Swift
Posts: 1279
Black Diamond, Alberta, Canada
A body is a body. It isn't the world's fault some of you cavemen can't separate your brain from your pecker.
Photographer
Greg Kolack
Posts: 18392
Elmhurst, Illinois, US
Paul Bryson Photography wrote:
Holy shit, a 3.5 year old thread!
I think this is the record for oldest thread bumped. I've actually seen one going back to 2005.
Photographer
JLC Images
Posts: 11615
Phillipsburg, New Jersey, US
I think the guy who resurrected this thread typed "no more Bush" into the search engine and this popped up. Must have been looking for a political thread.
Photographer
Paul Bryson Photography
Posts: 48041
Hollywood, Florida, US
G Anderson Photo wrote:
I have some very simple advice on this to photographers. If you shoot nudes with models (over 18), do NOT shoot with underage models under ANY circumstances.
That may sound extreme, but if you knew the cops view on this as I have experienced and heard from other photographers, you would take it seriously. Dude, you bumped one helluvan old thread!
And WTF are you doing that attracts cops?
Photographer
Greg Kolack
Posts: 18392
Elmhurst, Illinois, US
Mac Swift wrote:
A body is a body. It isn't the world's fault some of you cavemen can't separate your brain from your pecker. Are you referring to cavemen in 2006 or cavemen in 2009?
Because I am a cavemen, and in 2006, my pecker was firmly connected to my brain. But I have now found a way to seperate it, thanks to newly developed technology from earlier this year.
Photographer
Paul Bryson Photography
Posts: 48041
Hollywood, Florida, US
Greg Kolack wrote:
I've actually seen one going back to 2005. I guess I'll have to dig deep to find one for 2004 just to beat the record. 
Photographer
Paul Bryson Photography
Posts: 48041
Hollywood, Florida, US
Mac Swift wrote:
A body is a body. It isn't the world's fault some of you cavemen can't separate your brain from your pecker. Greg Kolack wrote:
Are you referring to cavemen in 2006 or cavemen in 2009? I think he's referring to Geico customers.
Photographer
Greg Kolack
Posts: 18392
Elmhurst, Illinois, US
Paul Bryson Photography wrote:
I guess I'll have to dig deep to find one for 2004 just to beat the record. MM began in late March of 2005...so if you find one from 2004 - you're good!
Photographer
JLC Images
Posts: 11615
Phillipsburg, New Jersey, US
G Anderson Photo wrote:
I have some very simple advice on this to photographers. If you shoot nudes with models (over 18), do NOT shoot with underage models under ANY circumstances.
That may sound extreme, but if you knew the cops view on this as I have experienced and heard from other photographers, you would take it seriously. Why do I feel there is more to this story?
I have a friend who said "it must be illegal to have allergies! There I was trying to buy 40 boxes of Sudefed for my sinus..."
Photographer
Fiddlers Green Photo
Posts: 1350
Edmonds, Washington, US
a thousand years from now anthropolgist will be puzzling over the odd fact that there is no pictorial record of what humans looked nude from age 2 until age 18 during the last and first centuries of the 2000 Millennium. I think I could write a reasonably interesting novel about this.
Photographer
Paul Bryson Photography
Posts: 48041
Hollywood, Florida, US
Greg Kolack wrote:
MM began in late March of 2005...so if you find one from 2004 - you're good! So flakes and escorts didn't exist 'till 2005?
Interesting...
Photographer
G Anderson Photo
Posts: 18
Madison, Wisconsin, US
I don't see a problem resurrecting an old thread if it is still an appropriate discussion. Must be a lot of bored people out there if they jumped on this so quickly. And yes there is MUCH more to the story. I just can't elaborate right now. But I promise, my recommendation is not far off base.
Model
on hiatus m
Posts: 6505
London, England, United Kingdom
G Anderson Photo wrote:
I have some very simple advice on this to photographers. If you shoot nudes with models (over 18), do NOT shoot with underage models under ANY circumstances.
That may sound extreme, but if you knew the cops view on this as I have experienced and heard from other photographers, you would take it seriously. Lumigraphics wrote:
A. This is an OLD thread
B. You are just plain wrong. Dude, listen to Lumi; he knows what he's talking about.
I have worked with photographers who shoot nudes.
They never asked for me to reveal my vulnerable underage boobies. 
Photographer
David Shinobi
Posts: 5746
Daytona Beach, Florida, US
G Anderson Photo wrote:
I don't see a problem resurrecting an old thread if it is still an appropriate discussion. Must be a lot of bored people out there if they jumped on this so quickly. And yes there is MUCH more to the story. I just can't elaborate right now. But I promise, my recommendation is not far off base. Were just giving you a hard time bud..
Youre not the first and wont be the last to dig up an OLD ASS thread but expect a little harmless poke at fun... 
Photographer
Greg Kolack
Posts: 18392
Elmhurst, Illinois, US
G Anderson Photo wrote:
I don't see a problem resurrecting an old thread if it is still an appropriate discussion. Must be a lot of bored people out there if they jumped on this so quickly. And yes there is MUCH more to the story. I just can't elaborate right now. But I promise, my recommendation is not far off base. You've been here for 4 years - you should read the rules:
(28) Bump old topics for no reason: And we will bump you to the brig. (You like that? Huh? That was clever, huh?)
Photographer
Greg Kolack
Posts: 18392
Elmhurst, Illinois, US
Morgan Barbour wrote:
They never asked for me to reveal my vulnerable underage boobies. "Vulnerable underage boobies"?
That sounds almost Shakespearean...
"Hark, bring into mine chamber your vulnerable underage boobies..."
Photographer
G Anderson Photo
Posts: 18
Madison, Wisconsin, US
Greg Kolack wrote:
You've been here for 4 years - you should read the rules:
(28) Bump old topics for no reason: And we will bump you to the brig. (You like that? Huh? That was clever, huh?) I don't even bother reading the manuals to my cameras or GPS. You are asking me to read THAT far down the rules on MM? LOL
|
