Forums >
Photography Talk >
PocketWizard
I have a 430ex and the 580ex II I can trigger the 430ex off from the 580 and was told I needed to get a PocketWizard so I can take the 580 off the camera. I don't know much about them so I don't know which ones to get. Pocket Wizard Plus II or Pocket Wizard Multimax. Also are there others that I should be looking at or is Pocketwizard the only game it town. Aug 24 08 12:56 am Link Ok, the 580ex will trigger the 430ex, but, that is from the camera mount. It works as wireless eTTL... If you use a PW, you will need to use PW's for all the flashes & set them to manual as the eTTL will no longer work, nor the wireless transmission from 580ex-430ex... Paul Aug 24 08 01:01 am Link Pocket wizards are notorious for being huge and for having their bulky size cause the plastic "foot" to break off. The newer ones are worse in that respect since the vast majority of the plastic body needs to be replaced, not just the "foot". I gave very careful consideration to the whole wireless thing after making some bad decisions. I have 4 Chinese ones that I'll damn near give away due to reliability issues. Also their batteries are not fun to find. I ended up going with a very tiny and very well made unit marketed by Tamrac. It's called a "Micro-Sync" and I've used it for 2 years without a single failure. I know, a lot of people on here will tell you to get a PW, because that's what they have. They do work. They do break...often. I think Mark Twain said it best... "Whenever you find you are on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect." Mark Twain Aug 24 08 01:09 am Link Ditto on the Micro Sync. Half the price of the pocket trout and way less obtrusive on your camera. Aug 24 08 01:13 am Link You can use the Canon ST-E2 Transmitter. It will sit on your hot shoe. It will trigger both flashes plus control their ratios. Aug 24 08 01:14 am Link Mikes Images - Mike #4 wrote: I use PW. They work perfectly, but every time I use them I am amazed anew at the unspeakable stupidity of the design ... and worry about breaking them at the foot. They are big, stick up too far, and the designers in a fit of epic contempt for the customer, DID NOT put any kind of flexible foot mount on them, which would have been easy to do and would have ended 99% of the worries of breakage. Aug 24 08 01:19 am Link Imageri by Tim Davis wrote: The only problem is that the trigger is infrared not radio, you can't use is it in bright sun because the sunlight will confuse the optical slave on the flashes. Other than that they are a great tool. Aug 24 08 01:22 am Link FotoMark wrote: And also there is the Field Of View problem. The flashes have to be like somewhere in between 70 degrees horizontally of the st-e2 and and somewhere in between 45 degrees vertically. Thats a real problem if you want a flash off behind your shoulder or way off left and right for wide angles. I gave up on infrared sensors so now i used Pocketwizards religiously. i have 5 of them lol. You do not really need the multimax unless you want rear sync. the pocketwizard plus II transceivers are what i use. Plus you can then get a sekonic light meter with built in pocketwizard capabilities Aug 24 08 01:30 am Link Mikes Images - Mike #4 wrote: Can you use them to fire my flashes? Aug 24 08 02:04 am Link JBL Photography wrote: Yup. Here's Google's results for sources of the equipment and info. Aug 24 08 02:17 am Link I use pocket wizards. Don't like their design but they work flawlessly every time. I guess that's why they're the industry standard. The only reason to get the multimax is if you are shooting around a lot of other photographers and you are worried about crossing channels. If not, just get the Plus II's. Being transceivers and using AA's is an extra plus. You will have to get 3 of these to get your system to work properly. There are other options but I don't have much experience with them. I've used the cheap ebay triggers made in china and they are good enough for the novice if you use a cropped sensor but won't work for a pro by any means. Paul C. Buff (Alien Bees) Just came out with a trigger that sounds like it may be a good alternative for about $140 less. For any system that doesn't use transceivers I'd pick up an extra transmitter for backup. Aug 24 08 02:25 am Link JBL Photography wrote: I have a set of MultiMaxes, as I wanted the transceiver function before the Plus II was released. For almost everything most photographers need, a Plus II is plenty. About the only time it's likely to be a problem is if you're shooting in a constrained area with other photographers using PWs; the 4 channels for the Plus-series is a limitation. (The MM has a lot of other features, but they're more specialized, and you'll probably know if you need them.) Aug 24 08 03:54 am Link I wouldnt bother with PW at all, if you want to remote control the flasehes then get the canon ir remote transmitter. now there is one thing to consider before plunging into this whole idea....would you be better off just using some real strobes insteead? for about 500 or so you can find some pretty decent strobes on ebay. i know i know...alien bee's is the best...not all of us can afford it. 320ws per strobe is fine for most apps, typically 2 strobes. and ive gotten fine results triggering the strobes with a wireless trigger for $25 bucks off ebay. Aug 24 08 04:05 am Link Imageri by Tim Davis wrote: That thing is almost as expensive as another speedlight. If you're going to go with one of those, you might as well buy another 580 and have even more flexibility. Aug 24 08 04:09 am Link I know it won't work with your Canon gear, but I use the "el cheapo" triggers offered by Alien Bees. So far, so good. lol Aug 24 08 04:11 am Link I don't think I want to get the st-e2, I would like to have the versatility that the RF type will give me and when I get a better light system it will work with that too. Aug 24 08 12:06 pm Link glamour pics wrote: If PW were smart, they would introduce a smaller sized shoe mount transmit-only module. Aug 24 08 12:53 pm Link Can the microsync's be used with Quantum's Q-flash? Aug 24 08 01:30 pm Link Mikes Images - Mike #4 wrote: That's a good point. I have 9 PW. 4 of them have the broken foot syndrome. Aug 25 08 12:10 am Link I swear by PWs. None of them have broken feet and they are used approximately 5 times a week on location. Maybe I have delicate hands, who knows. In order to see what the best setup would be with your speedlites, I would call PW directly and talk to one of their techs for the best setup. I would stay far away from IR triggers for a very many number of reasons. Aug 25 08 01:40 am Link okutake wrote: Here I sit wondering how a cropped sensor syncs differently than any other dimension of sensor. *grin* Aug 25 08 02:01 am Link Honest to god I've been using Wein IR wireless stuff since the stone age and the only problems I've encountered is with lightening Aug 25 08 04:58 am Link yea I don't think the IR trigger would be the way I would want to go. just to many limitations Aug 27 08 12:55 am Link Essential Form wrote: I wish I could answer that one. I'm not sure what causes it, but for some reason those ebay triggers create a region of distortion on the edges of images created of FF sensors. At least the ones made by Canon. No issues found with my Pocket Wizards. Aug 27 08 01:00 am Link Pocket Wizards are good but also the most expensive by far. The cost for 3 PWIIs is about $540 For appox $280 you could buy an Elinchrom Skyport system that would prob cover all your needs. Here is a review http://www.blewbmx.com/review,,skyport.php youtube demo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlAjHQJsMbA http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/5 … Slave.html Aug 27 08 01:50 am Link cactus trigger, $40, theres lot of cheap chinese products on ebay if you search wireless trigger. Aug 27 08 02:23 am Link I do agree that Cactus triggers are pretty handy for their price (gadgetinfinity.com). I myself have 6 as backups to my PWs. However, be warned that they are much more susceptible to interference, have a shorter range and switching channels is annoying since the tiny pins are underneath the transmitter. If you have to take shots where you must lower the odds of a misfire, Cactus/ebay triggers will not give you any peace of mind. In other words, if your client requires that you get the shot on the first try, well, don't skimp. On that note, PWs also run into interference but I get more sleep the night before a shoot not worrying as much about my field setup. Aug 27 08 02:40 am Link Brooklyn Bridge Images wrote: I considered the skyports, but PW's with AA batteries and being transceivers won out. I also factored in a back up transmitter when considering skyports. You're screwed if your transmitter goes but with transceivers, it just means you're either out one strobe or have to use it with the built in optical trigger. Also you can pick up AA's anywhere, anytime in pretty much any country. Aug 27 08 03:03 am Link okutake wrote: What the hell does sensor size have to do with flash triggers? Aug 27 08 03:12 am Link There is some effect in that the bigger the focal plane shutter, the farther the curtain travels, making for a longer curtain time for a similar curtain velocity. The bigger shutter also allows a narrower slit, so the shutter might have similar top shutterspeeds. I don't know about specific shutters or cameras without looking them up. It is the curtain travel time that controls the flash sync speed since the first curtain has to open all the way before the flash triggers and before the second curtain begins to close. Aug 27 08 05:15 am Link i would suggest AlienBees cybersyncs http://www.alienbees.com/cybersync.html for the 430 & 580 set up. i got 1 trigger and 2 receivers shipped for $208. they are smaller then PW & Skyports and very reliable... i haven't had 1 miss fire so far Aug 27 08 05:30 am Link I lost a 600 watt strobe,manfrotto stand, 22" beauty dish and PW2 when a gust of wind blew the whole rig off the top of a 20 storey building ( and yes it was sandbagged!) The only thing that was salvaged was a slightly scratched PW2 that still works perfectly! And the foot stayed on! You get what you pay for Aug 27 08 10:57 am Link I had the microsyncs but sold them. I started having irregularities when trying to fire more than one flash. Sometimes they wouldn't fire at the same time, or sometimes one wouldn't fire at all. They would only sync up to 1/160th on my camera. I switched to pocked wizards and haven't looked back. Now that they cyber syncs are out, I might be curious about those, but they weren't an option at the time. I do know that the pocket wizards are tried and true, and while you have to pony up a little more cash to buy a set, they DO work, Every Time, Period Aug 27 08 12:00 pm Link Mikes Images - Mike #4 wrote: Funny, I never had a problem with my PW- I have used this set for over 8yrs-and I shoot primarily sports/journalism...so they have been banged around some. Aug 27 08 12:04 pm Link i use the cheap wireless triggers off ebay...the ebay store is called Gadget Infinity...they are about $40 for a trigger and receiver and about $20 more for a 2nd receiver if needed...well worth the price...mine have functioned flawlessly since i got them... Aug 27 08 12:08 pm Link JLRPhoto wrote: I have written up a little report on the cybersyncs (just got them) but its not up on the web yet. The thing to be aware of is that they will only do 3 frames per second (vs. claimed 12 of pocket wizards and a tested 5fps with a cactus trigger (but this misfired occasionally at the receivers as might be expected with their reliability record) so you can't rattle two frames off in rapid succession. It seems to be the transmitter that can't do over 3fps so all flashes won't fire. They consistently and reliably fail above this. Their delay is good though and I can use the sync speed of the D3 Aug 27 08 04:23 pm Link okutake wrote: The battery cost / rarity factor is very important and often overlooked. Aug 27 08 04:51 pm Link |