Angelina Leigh wrote:
I am the model that is being spoken of, defamed and lied about in this post.

If anyone should have any questions or concerns regarding whether i am a playboy model, i would hope they would contact playboy themselves and find out if i modeled for them.

By the way, your more than welcome to check out my last spread online at:
PlayboysAllNaturals.com  (find me ... i am Angelina Leigh)
Two more spreads will be coming out in BUSTY BABES so look for me there in march hehe

that should put these trash lies about me behind me!

Model Mayhem has thus suspended this person portfolio.

Take note:
Defamation of Character and Slander are two very illegal activities!!!!

The company above has had legal issues in the past, and is NOT who they claim they are. Whitney, the model on the page, is actually the daughter and only actual model for a unlicensed business and non-exsistent company.
Chris Lunsford does not hold an agency license and is not a legal agent.
Please contact the better business bureau for more information.

Also, ask the WNY MMA who the real models of the WNY MMA are....they are not anything to do with Chris Lunsford! He lost that contract due to professionalism. I know of two of the people he speaks about in the above....and they are both wonderful people! Nothing this man says is true.

And PLEASE....do not send this guy the money he asks for (50 dollars contract/model fees)  this is the oldest scam in modeling history!

Angelina Leigh

Miss Fifi wrote:
So... wait... instead of letting everyone just not know who you are, you decide to out yourself?

Nothing wrong with her wanting to get her side of the story out.

Miss Fifi wrote:
So... wait... instead of letting everyone just not know who you are, you decide to out yourself?

^^^

LaViolette wrote:
Nothing wrong with her wanting to get her side of the story out.

Agreed , but my guess is that she will get attacked for it

But good on her for standing up for herself

Angelina Leigh wrote:
no, this man has posted this crap about me not only here but on a butt load of sites.

I got tired of his bs...and if people could think for themselves i wouldnt have to have posted a new thread.

funny how one person will say something and the flock just nods their heads...

anyone have the common sense to check info out on their own.

(and his blog did say my name)

I imagine you'll be linking us to his blog any moment now.

LaViolette wrote:

Nothing wrong with her wanting to get her side of the story out.

Miss Fifi wrote:
So... wait... instead of letting everyone just not know who you are, you decide to out yourself?

Evidently.

Garry k wrote:

Agreed , but my guess is that she will get attacked for it

PYPI FASHION wrote:

I imagine you'll be linking us to his blog any moment now.

and my guess it that where she leads people will follow , complaining all the way

LaViolette wrote:

Nothing wrong with her wanting to get her side of the story out.

But, she was never named... no one knew who the OP was talking about. Starting this thread seems like more drama than it's worth.

Miss Fifi wrote:

But, she was never named... no one knew who the OP was talking about. Starting this thread seems like more drama than it's worth.

Wanna help me make some manicotti?

Angelina Leigh wrote:
haha, you guess very well.

Just wait till the people attacking my decision to stnad by my name and desire to clear a lie about it get this happening to them.

then suddenly it is different.

I am sure many people would do the same

You need to understand some of the sociology of MM ,,, ie when a newcomer enters the discussion here and says something controversial or even not in tune with what the so called INternet modelling and photographer crowd appreciates - the newcomer is often attacked , sometimes in mass

But of course you need to be careful that you dont in turn slander the other party in return

Its one thing to defend yourself , its another to attack someone elss

Miss Fifi wrote:

But, she was never named... no one knew who the OP was talking about. Starting this thread seems like more drama than it's worth.

I guess you have to seize the opportunity for promotion when you can.

Raelyn Mouse wrote:

Wanna help me make some girl on girl lovin?

Sure I would!

Miss Fifi wrote:

Sure I would!

*licks*

ASYLUM - Retouching wrote:
I'm just here for the boobs.

Garry k wrote:

You need to understand some of the sociology of MM ,,, ie when a newcomer enters the discussion here and says something controversial or even not in tune with what the so called INternet modelling and photographer crowd appreciates - the newcomer is often attacked , sometimes in mass

But of course you need to be careful that you dont in turn slander the other party in return

Angelina Leigh wrote:
1. its not two models. its ONE model...ME

the other model is a guy...the photo and accnt were under his duaghters name but he ran the accnt.

2. be happy someone is willing to point stuff out and save other models problems in the future and money.

3. for those crabing about the post.... it would have been "funny" if i hadnt pointed this info out and youd have been one for the girls taken by a creeps approach.

I , personally, feel sorry for the girls who have been sending this guy money for no reason.

Sorry for not being a cold B8tch

Like I said, just boobs.

The story doesn't interest me, but you have nice cans.

ASYLUM - Retouching wrote:

Like I said, just boobs.

The story doesn't interest me, but you have nice cans.

Would you talk to this woman in such a manner if you encountered her in a public situation ?

Garry k wrote:

Would you talk to this woman in such a manner if you encountered her in a public situation ?

Yes.

(ask anyone that knows me in person)

ASYLUM - Retouching wrote:

Yes.

(ask anyone that knows me in person)

To further,

I'm the type to deflect unnecessary drama with jokes or innuendo... hence why I would.

C Thomas wrote:

thats pretty hot! can i shoot whilst this is going on?

If you have to ask, then the answer is no.

Lame.

Raelyn Mouse wrote:

If you have to ask, then the answer is no.

Lame.

Any real photographer would shoot it from many yards away with a major ZOOOOOM lens, right?

Raelyn Mouse wrote:

If you have to ask, then the answer is no.

Lame.

i know! but i didnt want to just invite myself!
and yeah its lame.

Raelyn Mouse wrote:

If you have to ask, then the answer is no.

Lame.

and i edited the post. figured id actually give a serious response to this.

ASYLUM - Retouching wrote:

Any real photographer would shoot it from many yards away with a major ZOOOOOM lens, right?

Or just simply invite us over for shoot, and let us take off. Right?

Raelyn Mouse wrote:

Or just simply invite us over for shoot, and let us take off. Right?

Well yeah, I mean if you are the up front sort of person, but really its so much more fun being a creepster in the bushes.

Raelyn Mouse wrote:

Or just simply invite us over for shoot, and let us take off. Right?

thats probably the approach i should have taken. (takes notes)
hey Raelyn, wanna invite a friend and come to md and shoot w/me?
hehehe

ASYLUM - Retouching wrote:

Well yeah, I mean if you are the up front sort of person, but really its so much more fun being a creepster in the bushes.

dude thats why i asked! not a creeeeeepster.

ASYLUM - Retouching wrote:
Well yeah, I mean if you are the up front sort of person, but really its so much more fun being a creepster in the bushes.

And you know that you wouldn't even need to ask. It'd probably just accidentally happen.

C Thomas wrote:
thats probably the approach i should have taken. (takes notes)
hey Raelyn, wanna invite a friend and come to md and shoot w/me?
hehehe

I'm in DC. IF you feel like hiring me before I leave on Monday, you can PM me.