Forums > Photography Talk > Escort wants to leave....

Photographer

ShadowBox Studio Photos

Posts: 212

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

...he's 16 and I'm a female photog.  I'm fine with Dad dropping him off, checking out the place, signing the release and leaving to return later, but, should he stay for the entire shoot?  Isn't that part of being an escort?  Legalities of him being under 18 and having the requirement of an escort?

I'm fine with escorts and don't mind them coming along for shoots...I encourage them if it helps the model feel more comfortable.

May 13 09 06:33 am Link

Photographer

Daniel Norton

Posts: 1745

New York, New York, US

Since when has it been illegal for a photographer to be alone with a model regardless of age?

May 13 09 06:35 am Link

Photographer

Cliff from NJ

Posts: 1430

Clinton, New Jersey, US

nude shoot?  Did Dad sign release?

May 13 09 06:36 am Link

Photographer

JA Sanchez

Posts: 6830

Miami, Florida, US

I doubt you are shooting him nude, so it's very likely that the only reason you need a 'guardian' is to sign the release. If you were just shooting for portfolio you would not really even need a guardian at all.

May 13 09 06:36 am Link

Photographer

MEK Photography

Posts: 6571

Westminster, Maryland, US

The legalities are, that the 16 yo model has to have a parent or legal guardian sign any paperwork.  That's it for this situation.  If dad wants to come, sign the papers, and take off, that's fine.  However, I would advise you to always shoot with a parent or legal guardian present.  If don't want to stick around, make something up like you'll need their help holding reflectors or whatnot.

May 13 09 06:37 am Link

Model

Victoria Mala

Posts: 83

Raleigh, North Carolina, US

I think as long as Dad signed on the dotted line, you're ok.

When I was underage, my parent didn't always hang around on site; nobody ever ran into problems like this. I'm not sure if it's a unique experience though.

Meanwhile, this is a twist from what usually gets posted about escorts!

May 13 09 06:38 am Link

Photographer

ShadowBox Studio Photos

Posts: 212

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

No, it's not a nude shoot.  Just portfolio building.

...and I didn't imply that anything was illegal.  Just the legalities of it.  Sheesh.

May 13 09 06:39 am Link

Model

crownme

Posts: 936

Gaithersburg, Maryland, US

+1
Dont you just hate it when they do that? smile

May 13 09 06:41 am Link

Photographer

VanityForce Imaging LLC

Posts: 2209

Chicago, Illinois, US

ShadowBox Studio Photos wrote:
No, it's not a nude shoot.  Just portfolio building.

...and I didn't imply that anything was illegal.  Just the legalities of it.  Sheesh.

If they're under 18, I make mommy or daddy stay.  Not sure if it's wrong or right and not everyone will agree, but it's company policy and that's just that!

Mike

May 13 09 06:41 am Link

Photographer

S W I N S K E Y

Posts: 24376

Saint Petersburg, Florida, US

Daniel Norton wrote:
Since when has it been illegal for a photographer to be alone with a model regardless of age?

are you familiar with Canadian law?

there are such legal requirements in california in commercial settings.

just sayin ~

May 13 09 06:41 am Link

Photographer

Abbitt Photography

Posts: 13564

Washington, Utah, US

Well, hopefully it's an experience that will have no reprocussions, but make you think ahead of time about the terms of a shoot that are important to make clear before the shoot.  We all get those little wake up calls.

May 13 09 06:41 am Link

Model

crownme

Posts: 936

Gaithersburg, Maryland, US

ShadowBox Studio Photos wrote:
...he's 16 and I'm a female photog.  I'm fine with Dad dropping him off, checking out the place, signing the release and leaving to return later, but, should he stay for the entire shoot?  Isn't that part of being an escort?  Legalities of him being under 18 and having the requirement of an escort?

I'm fine with escorts and don't mind them coming along for shoots...I encourage them if it helps the model feel more comfortable.

How well do you know these people? It could be a set-up
you know, like that Michael Jackson thing.. This world is
crazy and you just never know. Maybe you should suggest to the
parents that they stick around so that there is no problems at all smile

May 13 09 06:46 am Link

Photographer

ShadowBox Studio Photos

Posts: 212

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Aleemah wrote:
How well do you know these people?

This is our first shoot together.  Interaction has been via messaging here on MM.  It shouldn't be a long shoot anyway, about an hour maybe....it might be enough to encourage Dad to stay afterall, when he'll just have to come back in an hour anyhow.

May 13 09 06:54 am Link

Photographer

Daniel Norton

Posts: 1745

New York, New York, US

Doug Swinskey wrote:

are you familiar with Canadian law?

there are such legal requirements in california in commercial settings.

just sayin ~

A parent does not have to be there, just a "teacher/child wrangler" to cover the production as far as I can remember, been a while since I've worked in Cali.

Canadian law, you are correct, I am not familiar.

May 13 09 06:58 am Link

Photographer

Daniel Norton

Posts: 1745

New York, New York, US

Aleemah wrote:
.... It could be a set-up
you know, like that Michael Jackson thing.. ...

OMG

May 13 09 06:59 am Link

Photographer

GD Whalen

Posts: 1886

Asheville, North Carolina, US

I always make decisions based on rish/reward.  In this case I see no reward for the parent leaving.  But I do see risk.  You just never know what might happen and I really think that it is in your best interest to insist that a parent or guardian stay around.  Unless of course you have other staff there during the shoot.  But if it is just you and the child I would insist a parent stick around during the entire shoot.  But honestly, I would always recommend having some other staff around. 

http://www.garydwhalen.com

May 13 09 07:03 am Link

Photographer

SonoraImages

Posts: 673

Phoenix, Arizona, US

Check the laws of Canada and your province (state??).  In the US, the parent or legal guardian has to sign the release if you are a minor (age depends on your state...I believe there are a couple states that require you to be older than 18 to legally sign). 

Personally, I would require the parent/guardian to be present for a minor...to avoid any accusations of "impropriety" because I usually shoot without MUA/assistant.  If I have someone else present, then I would not be concerned.

May 13 09 07:05 am Link

Photographer

Stock Photo Showcase

Posts: 471

Arlington, Virginia, US

for your own protection, avoid being alone with a minor you aren't related to. If that is not possible, avoid being in a location where you cannot be seen by other people. People who can see you or be with you don't have to be of the age of majority but you need other people in order to reduce your own risk.

May 13 09 07:54 am Link

Photographer

ChanStudio

Posts: 9219

Alpharetta, Georgia, US

For any underage (model) photo shoot, there should be another adult (model's parents or relative) there at the photo shoot at all time. 

  It is for the photographer's own good.

May 13 09 07:59 am Link

Photographer

Doug Lester

Posts: 10591

Atlanta, Georgia, US

Sometimes it's quite difficult in actually coming to terms with the level of paranoia on this site regarding underage models. I'm aware of no law, anywhere in the world, which prevents a photographer from being alone with an underage model. Before I retired from commercial work I photographed countless underage models and clients without a parent present. Don't you folks realize that every day of the week 16 year olds walk into studios to have their age appropriate photos  made.  The only reason parents even enter the question is for their signature on  a valid release.

Yes, some states have specific laws requiring certain provisions for for commercial gigs, but those are far more related to movies and such, where the child is on set for days or weeks. Has anyone ever having a  teacher present during a photos shoot? That's the sort of thing those laws require.

May 13 09 08:12 am Link

Photographer

DOUGLASFOTOS

Posts: 10604

Los Angeles, California, US

I ran into something like that several months ago. He is a MM Model and he is nice looking and I wanted to do shirtless and some underwear with this model. But when he came for my test shoot and interview session, I found out he was just 17. While his MM account said he was 18. SO, I was not amused by this lil white lie on his account.  Since it is MM, everyone lies, that is why I do face to face interviews, and try to find out all info.

I told the Model this, IF he truly wanted to do the shoot, please bring his Mom or Dad to the shoot, so that they can sign the model release also with u. His response was that they will be out of town that day, and that he would bring his MAID!!!!

I said, NO. and never shoot the Model. End of Story.

May 13 09 08:31 am Link

Photographer

VanityForce Imaging LLC

Posts: 2209

Chicago, Illinois, US

Stock Photo Showcase wrote:
for your own protection, avoid being alone with a minor you aren't related to. If that is not possible, avoid being in a location where you cannot be seen by other people. People who can see you or be with you don't have to be of the age of majority but you need other people in order to reduce your own risk.

My thoughts exactly.  Why take the chance!

May 13 09 08:58 am Link

Photographer

Prose Photography

Posts: 1419

Glendale, Arizona, US

Mike Shutter-Ace wrote:

My thoughts exactly.  Why take the chance!

+1

May 13 09 09:02 am Link

Photographer

EyeCanShoot

Posts: 1198

Orlando, Florida, US

I don't shoot minors for that reason (but on a seperate note) as stated above - I wish escorts would leave lol...

May 13 09 09:04 am Link

Photographer

Isaiah Brink

Posts: 2328

Charlotte, North Carolina, US

ShadowBox Studio Photos wrote:
...he's 16 and I'm a female photog.  I'm fine with Dad dropping him off, checking out the place, signing the release and leaving to return later, but, should he stay for the entire shoot?  Isn't that part of being an escort?  Legalities of him being under 18 and having the requirement of an escort?

I'm fine with escorts and don't mind them coming along for shoots...I encourage them if it helps the model feel more comfortable.

While I know you'd keep your nose clean and not do anything wrong, all it takes is the model saying one thing, and the next thing you know, you're in trouble having to prove you're not guilty.  I'd recommend that you keep the parent/guardian around, even though it many not be required or necessary since most people won't start any sort of problems.

May 13 09 09:07 am Link

Photographer

tigerfist photography

Posts: 2100

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Aleemah wrote:
How well do you know these people? It could be a set-up
you know, like that Michael Jackson thing.. This world is
crazy and you just never know. Maybe you should suggest to the
parents that they stick around so that there is no problems at all smile

Stock Photo Showcase wrote:
for your own protection, avoid being alone with a minor you aren't related to. If that is not possible, avoid being in a location where you cannot be seen by other people. People who can see you or be with you don't have to be of the age of majority but you need other people in order to reduce your own risk.

Isaiah Brink wrote:
While I know you'd keep your nose clean and not do anything wrong, all it takes is the model saying one thing, and the next thing you know, you're in trouble having to prove you're not guilty.  I'd recommend that you keep the parent/guardian around, even though it many not be required or necessary since most people won't start any sort of problems.

you guys are insanely paranoid. i'm kinda worried for half of you who think being alone with a teenager is going to ruin your lives or that all teenagers are out to entice and entrap you. like, how do you go out in public thinking this all the time? do you think all teenagers or models are out to get you? i shoot teenagers all the time. hell, their parents know me through conventions and my website and know that i'm not going to rape their kid.

parents do drop their kids off at tons of business: malls, hair salons, gyms, spas, etc. and many kids are left alone with professionals. hell, i see kids dropped off at bryn allan or olan mills for senior pictures too. and, god forbid, THEY'RE ALONE WITH THE PHOTOGRAPHER! hell, i went alone for my portrait and my photographer didn't try to rape me and i didn't sit there planning on spinning a yarn about him trying to do anything so i can sue him.

i can understand the worry if it's for insurance purposes (studio equipment, etc) but the kid is 16 years old. he's arguably not retarded and won't run around and break stuff. plus, i doubt he's going to go to the trouble of planning a shoot. having his father sign paper work (on the spot) just to say THIS PERSON DID THIS TO ME and sell it to the news. hell, she has spoken to the father and he even agreed to drop him off. both parties agreed to what's to be done. paperwork was signed. put a clause in there if you're that worried and get copies of ids. shoot with assistants or a team. etc.

i really doubt a paying customer would go to such insane lengths to scam someone. and i live in the biggest scam-artist state in the usa.

May 13 09 09:54 am Link

Photographer

SonoraImages

Posts: 673

Phoenix, Arizona, US

tigerfist wrote:

Aleemah wrote:
How well do you know these people? It could be a set-up
you know, like that Michael Jackson thing.. This world is
crazy and you just never know. Maybe you should suggest to the
parents that they stick around so that there is no problems at all smile

Stock Photo Showcase wrote:
for your own protection, avoid being alone with a minor you aren't related to. If that is not possible, avoid being in a location where you cannot be seen by other people. People who can see you or be with you don't have to be of the age of majority but you need other people in order to reduce your own risk.

you guys are insanely paranoid. i'm kinda worried for half of you who think being alone with a teenager is going to ruin your lives or that all teenagers are out to entice and entrap you. like, how do you go out in public thinking this all the time? do you think all teenagers or models are out to get you? i shoot teenagers all the time. hell, their parents know me through conventions and my website and know that i'm not going to rape their kid.

parents do drop their kids off at tons of business: malls, hair salons, gyms, spas, etc. and many kids are left alone with professionals. hell, i see kids dropped off at bryn allan or olan mills for senior pictures too. and, god forbid, THEY'RE ALONE WITH THE PHOTOGRAPHER! hell, i went alone for my portrait and my photographer didn't try to rape me and i didn't sit there planning on spinning a yarn about him trying to do anything so i can sue him.

i can understand the worry if it's for insurance purposes (studio equipment, etc) but the kid is 16 years old. he's arguably not retarded and won't run around and break stuff. plus, i doubt he's going to go to the trouble of planning a shoot. having his father sign paper work (on the spot) just to say THIS PERSON DID THIS TO ME and sell it to the news. hell, she has spoken to the father and he even agreed to drop him off. both parties agreed to what's to be done. paperwork was signed. put a clause in there if you're that worried and get copies of ids. shoot with assistants or a team. etc.

i really doubt a paying customer would go to such insane lengths to scam someone. and i live in the biggest scam-artist state in the usa.

With the way things are going in many parts of the country, photographers who do not work with a staff have every right to be paranoid when it comes to shooting minors.  If you read or watch the news, you see teachers, etc. being accused by kids or parents of some "inappropriate" activity.  They are GUILTY until they prove themselves innocent.  EVEN IF they are found innocent, it is at great expense of time and money, and character assassination.  If the news does publicize their innocense, it is buried where no one can, or does,  read it!  I know that accusations can be made if the model is an adult, but the stigma and grief is much greater if it is with a minor....IMHO!  And if you don't think that a 16 or 17 year old is capable of making a false accusation because something did not go the way they anticipated in a shoot, you've got your head in the sand!

May 13 09 10:44 am Link

Photographer

Christine Eadie

Posts: 2614

Charleston, South Carolina, US

I have an assistant present when photographing the opposite sex indoors or in a secluded location...unless they're family or close friends. It helps retain a professional atmosphere and sends a clear message that I'm not interested in seducing them. That's just me.  Of course you should do whatever you feel is right for you.
As for under 18, I wouldn't do a shoot unless I met the parent and they signed the paperwork. Since I have an assistant there, it doesn't matter if the parent sticks around or not. Just make sure your paperwork is clear and covers you for liability and you're okay.

May 13 09 10:46 am Link

Photographer

BDQMedia LLC

Posts: 547

Atlanta, Georgia, US

ShadowBox Studio Photos wrote:
No, it's not a nude shoot.  Just portfolio building.

...and I didn't imply that anything was illegal.  Just the legalities of it.  Sheesh.

I understand, when you wrap things up....where is dad to take his boy home? What if you are busy and have to leave? Are you just going to leave the kid? Hmmmm....that could be legal trouble for you should anything happen to Jr.

May 13 09 10:52 am Link

Photographer

Stock Photo Showcase

Posts: 471

Arlington, Virginia, US

note on comments about paranoia - I work with children and youth in a variety of organizations and each has the same policy: All adults MUST avoid being alone with children - there must either be another adult present and/or other children/youth present, and we SHOULD always be in places visible to others. If we are not, it is grounds for the cancellation of the liability insurance policy. IF you believe YOUR liability coverage is sounder, by all means do whatever you want. I won't talk about your recklessness or say I told you so.

May 13 09 11:27 am Link

Photographer

MisterC

Posts: 15162

Portland, Oregon, US

There's just not enough information about escorts here on MM.

May 13 09 11:29 am Link

Photographer

Julian II

Posts: 449

Palm Desert, California, US

MinisterC  wrote:
There's just not enough information about escorts here on MM.

+1

May 13 09 11:38 am Link

Photographer

Kevin Connery

Posts: 17824

El Segundo, California, US

MinisterC  wrote:
There's just not enough information about escorts here on MM.

There's just not enough people who read threads on MM before responding to them.

There are, however, more than enough people who will interject ('hijack') snarky remarks about how often topics come up.

Wonder why that is?

/hijack

OP: there's no legal requirement that the parent remain. There may be valid personal reasons, but nothing specific regarding legality.

May 13 09 11:51 am Link

Photographer

ShadowBox Studio Photos

Posts: 212

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

shooterfoto wrote:

I understand, when you wrap things up....where is dad to take his boy home? What if you are busy and have to leave? Are you just going to leave the kid? Hmmmm....that could be legal trouble for you should anything happen to Jr.

It will be a short shoot, I have another model coming in after him, so no worries there.  I have decided to ask daddy-o to stick around.  Since it's a short shoot, there's no point in him leaving and having to turn around 5 mins later to pick up Jr.

I have however, over the course of the day, discovered one of my tester models was underage.  I'll be taking her photos off my website toute suite!  Ugh, they slip under the radar that's for sure.  At least this little feller was upfront.

Thanks to everyone for their input, and not shredding me to bits over the fact that it was an escort post.  Seems my position was fairly unique, so I thought it was a valid question.  big_smile

May 13 09 01:09 pm Link