Forums > Model Colloquy > Any agencies that accept models of 5'6'' height?

Model

Aarendy

Posts: 1

Tuscaloosa, Alabama, US

I really want to move up in the fashion world. But i have been getting trouble finding agencies that accepts models my height. I rather to print modeling than runway. Any suggestions? Your answers will help me alot!

Aarendy

Jun 05 10 08:26 pm Link

Model

deleteeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Posts: 66

Newport Beach, California, US

Try to start off with smaller agencies and then work your way up. Chances are theres some small agencies near, or around, your area that work with a commercial focus (editorial isn't easy to get into unless you have the height or lots of experience).

Jun 05 10 08:29 pm Link

Model

Z A N Z A N

Posts: 2861

York Harbour, Guam, US

Jessica Mary S wrote:
Try to start off with smaller agencies and then work your way up. Chances are theres some small agencies near, or around, your area that work with a commercial focus (editorial isn't easy to get into unless you have the height or lots of experience).

+1 and if you haven't read this, you definantly should
www.newmodels.com

Jun 05 10 08:30 pm Link

Photographer

Lucas Chapman

Posts: 6129

Scottsdale, Arizona, US

Aarendy wrote:
I really want to move up in the fashion world. But i have been getting trouble finding agencies that accepts models my height. I rather to print modeling than runway. Any suggestions? Your answers will help me alot!

Aarendy

Sorry, but "print" models are no different that fashion models when it comes to agencies.  You will still have to be 5'9" or taller in most cases to get agency representation... unless you consider John Casablanca an agency... they take anyone.

Jun 05 10 08:32 pm Link

Model

Erin Holmes

Posts: 6583

Albuquerque, New Mexico, US

My suggestion: get realistic. You will be a lot happier once you find your niche and accept it.

Jun 05 10 10:48 pm Link

Photographer

B R U N E S C I

Posts: 25319

Bath, England, United Kingdom

Dark Eden wrote:
My suggestion: get realistic. You will be a lot happier once you find your niche and accept it.

+1

www.newmodels.com/height.html



Ciao
Stefano

www.stefanobrunesci.com

Jun 06 10 12:52 am Link

Model

Malin_

Posts: 3902

New York, New York, US

Lucas Chapman wrote:
Sorry, but "print" models are no different that fashion models when it comes to agencies.  You will still have to be 5'9" or taller in most cases to get agency representation... unless you consider John Casablanca an agency... they take anyone.

Wrong. I have friends who are as short as 5'2 who freelance with reputable NY print agencies such as CESD, Clear, Bella and others.

Obviously, there are still other requirements that need to be fulfilled, but...

Jun 06 10 03:37 am Link

Model

K I C K H A M

Posts: 14689

Los Angeles, California, US

Lucas Chapman wrote:
Sorry, but "print" models are no different that fashion models when it comes to agencies.  You will still have to be 5'9" or taller in most cases to get agency representation... unless you consider John Casablanca an agency... they take anyone.

Bull. Of course I could pull out that many agencies stretch the truth, but let's stick with what they promote.

So, here we go:

That must be why this girl is signed with Elite in LA, listed as 5'8.

Or how about this one, also with Elite LA, listed as 5'7?

This one is  5'8.5, but is with Elite NY.

This one is 5'8 flat with Elite NY.

[url=http://elitemodels.com/details.aspx?navbtn=1&city=NY&modelid=482776&pic=019.jpg&subid=4666&mainsubid=4666&io=111&indx=1[/url]is also 5'8 flat with Elite NY.

Would you like me to go through some other agencies and show their exceptions as well, or is this good enough for you?

Jun 06 10 05:54 am Link

Photographer

All Yours Photography

Posts: 2731

Lawton, Oklahoma, US

K I C K H A M wrote:
That must be why this girl is signed with Elite in LA, listed as 5'8.

Or how about this one, also with Elite LA, listed as 5'7?

This one is  5'8.5, but is with Elite NY.

This one is 5'8 flat with Elite NY.

Would you like me to go through some other agencies and show their exceptions as well, or is this good enough for you?

Only the first link goes to a model profile.  The others just go to the agency.

Jun 06 10 06:13 am Link

Model

K I C K H A M

Posts: 14689

Los Angeles, California, US

All Yours Photography wrote:

Only the first link goes to a model profile.  The others just go to the agency.

Well that's depressing. Grrrr. Let me find them....

Jun 06 10 06:25 am Link

Photographer

Jay Farrell

Posts: 13408

Nashville, Tennessee, US

Dark Eden wrote:
My suggestion: get realistic. You will be a lot happier once you find your niche and accept it.

This, m hm. borat

Jun 06 10 06:30 am Link

Model

K I C K H A M

Posts: 14689

Los Angeles, California, US

All Yours Photography wrote:

Only the first link goes to a model profile.  The others just go to the agency.

All fixed! big_smile

Jun 06 10 06:35 am Link

Model

Estefania Abaddon

Posts: 399

Porto, Norte, Portugal

K I C K H A M wrote:
That must be why this girl is signed with Elite in LA, listed as 5'8.

Or how about this one, also with Elite LA, listed as 5'7?

This one is  5'8.5, but is with Elite NY.

This one is 5'8 flat with Elite NY.

[url=http://elitemodels.com/details.aspx?navbtn=1&city=NY&modelid=482776&pic=019.jpg&subid=4666&mainsubid=4666&io=111&indx=1[/url]is also 5'8 flat with Elite NY.

Would you like me to go through some other agencies and show their exceptions as well, or is this good enough for you?

This girls are way too perfect. Body, measurements, face, eyes, skin, mouth, hair,... Everything is perfect. That's why they are exceptions.

Me, for example, and with my 5'8'', no way I will be able to enter an agency.

We need to be realistic, doc.

Jun 06 10 06:42 am Link

Model

marissa charles

Posts: 2935

London, England, United Kingdom

Abaddon Maiden wrote:

This girls are way too perfect. Body, measurements, face, eyes, skin, mouth, hair,... Everything is perfect. That's why they are exceptions.

Me, for example, and with my 5'8'', no way I will be able to enter an agency.

We need to be realistic, doc.

+1

Jun 06 10 07:06 am Link

Photographer

Michael Bots

Posts: 8020

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Of course there are agencies that handle 5'6" -- commercial (not runway)  The problem with fashion shows is the designers want runway models all the same size, but that does not rule out shorter models for catalog and promotional work - all other parts of the business.

for proof -- example model/actress

Angela Little   Height: 5 feet 2 in  Weight: 95 lbs  from  small town  Albertville  Alabama

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_Little

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0514516/resume
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0514516/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV60oWmtwEI
http://img.listal.com/image/717703/600f … little.jpg


https://img.listal.com/image/717696/600full-angela-little.jpg https://snarkerati.com/profile_pics/Angela-Little.jpg

Jun 06 10 07:25 am Link

Model

K I C K H A M

Posts: 14689

Los Angeles, California, US

Abaddon Maiden wrote:

This girls are way too perfect. Body, measurements, face, eyes, skin, mouth, hair,... Everything is perfect. That's why they are exceptions.

Me, for example, and with my 5'8'', no way I will be able to enter an agency.

We need to be realistic, doc.

When answering these threads, I never look at the OPs portfolio, because I am not an agent. But there are people who like to say there is no chance for an under 5'9. While that may be the case in general, the girls under 5'9 who are signed (I am about to be one of them) got there by giving it a shot.

Now, am I saying spend 2 grand on a portfolio and shoots and development?

No, but I am saying that, if you think you have what it takes, going to a few go-sees and submitting polaroids isn't going to hurt (well, their responses may hurt... but still).

It's about being realistic, but in reality, exceptions happen. You just have to understand your disadvantages and be realistic that it's a long shot, and decide for yourself whether it's worth it or not.

Jun 06 10 08:07 am Link

Photographer

Yves Duchamp - Femme

Posts: 24436

Virginia Beach, Virginia, US

I could have sworn Lucas said "most" cases. Most being at least 51% of the time. Pulling out 2 or 3 examples of little people in advertisements doesn't really (dis)prove much.

Jun 06 10 08:11 am Link

Model

K I C K H A M

Posts: 14689

Los Angeles, California, US

argh double post.

Jun 06 10 08:17 am Link

Model

K I C K H A M

Posts: 14689

Los Angeles, California, US

Shon D.- Femme wrote:
I could have sworn Lucas said "most" cases. Most being at least 51% of the time. Pulling out 2 or 3 examples of little people in advertisements doesn't really (dis)prove much.

There are plenty of reputable agencies that accept down to 5'7 for commercial. The way he states things, you would think that any under 5'9 are the ridiculous exception to be agency repped. In awesomely amazing agencies, maybe, but there are plenty of legitimate agencies who accept applications from shorter models. Of course, "shorter" is generally still at least 5'7.

Jun 06 10 08:17 am Link

Wardrobe Stylist

The Fitting Room

Posts: 71

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US

Wrong. I have friends who are as short as 5'2 who freelance with reputable NY print agencies such as CESD, Clear, Bella and others.

Obviously, there are still other requirements that need to be fulfilled, but...

I have never heard of ANY of these agencies.  Reputable or not a career cannot be made of extra work alone.  Print models, actual  working models, are taller than 5'2".  I dare you to find one successful model who is 5'2".

Jun 06 10 08:20 am Link

Wardrobe Stylist

The Fitting Room

Posts: 71

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US

That first part was quoted from another poster... not sure why that didn't work.

Jun 06 10 08:21 am Link

Model

marissa charles

Posts: 2935

London, England, United Kingdom

I think because the OP said fashion. Commercial is fine, but that would be up to the agencies.x

Jun 06 10 08:30 am Link

Model

K I C K H A M

Posts: 14689

Los Angeles, California, US

marissa charles wrote:
I think because the OP said fashion. Commercial is fine, but that would be up to the agencies.x

This is true, but Lucas specifically said "to be agency represented," which he does quite often.

Jun 06 10 08:32 am Link

Photographer

S W I N S K E Y

Posts: 24376

Saint Petersburg, Florida, US

i not sure any agency is going to be interested in you and height isnt the issue.....it's because of that tat (if its real) across your midsection.

there are way to many perfect females walking around that don't have to be photoshopped when doing a swimwear/lingerie shoot.

just sayin ~

Jun 06 10 08:36 am Link

Model

K I C K H A M

Posts: 14689

Los Angeles, California, US

S W I N S K E Y wrote:
i not sure any agency is going to be interested in you and height isnt the issue.....it's because of that tat (if its real) across your midsection.

there are way to many perfect females walking around that don't have to be photoshopped when doing a swimwear/lingerie shoot.

just sayin ~

I just looked at her portfolio and it says it is paint. I sure hope so.


P.S. neutral Where is your pretty tummy avi?

Jun 06 10 08:40 am Link

Photographer

Paul Tirado Photography

Posts: 4363

New York, New York, US

K I C K H A M wrote:
Bull. Of course I could pull out that many agencies stretch the truth, but let's stick with what they promote.

So, here we go:

That must be why this girl is signed with Elite in LA, listed as 5'8.

Or how about this one, also with Elite LA, listed as 5'7?

This one is  5'8.5, but is with Elite NY.

This one is 5'8 flat with Elite NY.

[url=http://elitemodels.com/details.aspx?navbtn=1&city=NY&modelid=482776&pic=019.jpg&subid=4666&mainsubid=4666&io=111&indx=1[/url]is also 5'8 flat with Elite NY.

Would you like me to go through some other agencies and show their exceptions as well, or is this good enough for you?

+1. I have shot some agency models from very reputable agencies in NYC who were 5'6'' or so - listed at 5'8'' but I know what 5'8'' is...I am 5'8''. lol

Now as another poster intoned, they really really really have to love everything about you. Also I am sure they would not send you out to casting in which that was an absolute dealbreaker.

Jun 06 10 08:40 am Link

Photographer

Dave Krueger

Posts: 2851

Huntsville, Alabama, US

Yeah, 5'6" is to short for most mainstream fashion, but I get a lot of email telling about stuff that you can use to "add length".  Of course, you could try the surgical route, but then you'd have to find an agency that doesn't mind those nasty scars.  Or you could move to a country where 5'6" is tall.

Or you could do like a lot of models on MM do about their weight: lie and hope no one notices.  smile

Jun 06 10 08:50 am Link

Model

Malin_

Posts: 3902

New York, New York, US

The Fitting Room wrote:
Wrong. I have friends who are as short as 5'2 who freelance with reputable NY print agencies such as CESD, Clear, Bella and others.

Obviously, there are still other requirements that need to be fulfilled, but...
I have never heard of ANY of these agencies.  Reputable or not a career cannot be made of extra work alone.  Print models, actual  working models, are taller than 5'2".  I dare you to find one successful model who is 5'2".

???? Extra work? What are you talking about?

I'm not going to waste time on responding to you since you obviously know very little about working in commercial print in NY. If you did, you would know the agencies I named...

Jun 06 10 08:51 am Link

Photographer

Michael Bots

Posts: 8020

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Google image search for " dita von tease "  --  1,320,000 image results = successful modeling career
-- face of MAC cosmetics, face of Wonderbra

height 5'4"
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0842258/bio
http://www.google.com/images?q=dita+von … =0&ndsp=20

https://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/03_01/ditavonteeseSPL_468x393.jpg

Jun 06 10 08:58 am Link

Model

Malin_

Posts: 3902

New York, New York, US

Michael Bots wrote:
Google image search for " dita von tease "  --  1,320,000 image results = successful modeling career
-- face of MAC cosmetics, face of Wonderbra

height 5'4"

Yeah, but she is a celebrity! For them, different "rules" clearly apply.

Jun 06 10 09:05 am Link

Photographer

Dave Krueger

Posts: 2851

Huntsville, Alabama, US

I'm so short I don't even qualify to be a fashion photographer.  Well, that combined with the fact that I don't know what I'm doing, have no interpersonal skills, and am a nobody among nobodies when it comes to... well, anything.

You live pretty close to me.  We should get together and commiserate over the cruelties of the "size-matters" culture under which we are both being persecuted.  Hell, we could even do a shoot after which the resulting pictures would probably make your height completely irrelevant as a reason for your not being accepted as a fashion model.

Jun 06 10 09:08 am Link

Photographer

Michael Bots

Posts: 8020

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Malin_ wrote:

Yeah, but she is a celebrity! For them, different "rules" clearly apply.

Didn't start as a celebrity - her first job was working a department store sales counter.  Met her over 10 years ago, she has that undefinable "it" quality.

Jun 06 10 09:12 am Link

Model

Estefania Abaddon

Posts: 399

Porto, Norte, Portugal

Malin_ wrote:
Yeah, but she is a celebrity! For them, different "rules" clearly apply.

And not only. She is one of my idols but look:

-She started as a fetish/soft-core pornographic star. She is known by her videos with Anita Blond (a porn star) and others in latex/masturbating/ropes.

-She is a burlesque dancer. Burlesque dancers are short and with lots of curves.

-She was married to Marilyn Manson and that puts her in the "celebrity" page.

There is no problem for her. And most of her shoots are fetish, nudes or pin-up.

Jun 06 10 09:12 am Link

Photographer

Lynn Helms Photography

Posts: 382

Austin, Texas, US

K I C K H A M wrote:

Bull. Of course I could pull out that many agencies stretch the truth, but let's stick with what they promote.

So, here we go:

That must be why this girl is signed with Elite in LA, listed as 5'8.

Or how about this one, also with Elite LA, listed as 5'7?

This one is  5'8.5, but is with Elite NY.

This one is 5'8 flat with Elite NY.

[url=http://elitemodels.com/details.aspx?navbtn=1&city=NY&modelid=482776&pic=019.jpg&subid=4666&mainsubid=4666&io=111&indx=1[/url]is also 5'8 flat with Elite NY.

Would you like me to go through some other agencies and show their exceptions as well, or is this good enough for you?

On Elite's page called 'Be Discovered' it states their requirements. Which happen to be 5'9" if you are over 16. You can be 5'7" if you are 14 or 15.

Jun 06 10 09:12 am Link

Photographer

Dave Krueger

Posts: 2851

Huntsville, Alabama, US

Abaddon Maiden wrote:
-She started as a fetish/soft-core pornographic star.

I could help out with that part!

Jun 06 10 09:15 am Link

Photographer

Dave Krueger

Posts: 2851

Huntsville, Alabama, US

Actually, identifying the tiny percentage of exceptions to the 5'8" rule is probably not doing much to encourage a reality based perspective.  Some people survive a jump from the Golden Gate Bridge, but it's not an argument I would employ while talking someone down from the railing.

Jun 06 10 09:19 am Link

Photographer

Lucas Chapman

Posts: 6129

Scottsdale, Arizona, US

K I C K H A M wrote:

Bull. Of course I could pull out that many agencies stretch the truth, but let's stick with what they promote.

So, here we go:

That must be why this girl is signed with Elite in LA, listed as 5'8.

Or how about this one, also with Elite LA, listed as 5'7?

This one is  5'8.5, but is with Elite NY.

This one is 5'8 flat with Elite NY.

[url=http://elitemodels.com/details.aspx?navbtn=1&city=NY&modelid=482776&pic=019.jpg&subid=4666&mainsubid=4666&io=111&indx=1[/url]is also 5'8 flat with Elite NY.

Would you like me to go through some other agencies and show their exceptions as well, or is this good enough for you?

Read the OP's post header:  Any agencies that accept models of 5'6'' height?

There is a huge difference between 5'6" (which could be a stretch) and 5'8" (which likely IS a stretch)

Jun 06 10 09:23 am Link

Photographer

Lucas Chapman

Posts: 6129

Scottsdale, Arizona, US

K I C K H A M wrote:

There are plenty of reputable agencies that accept down to 5'7 for commercial. The way he states things, you would think that any under 5'9 are the ridiculous exception to be agency repped. In awesomely amazing agencies, maybe, but there are plenty of legitimate agencies who accept applications from shorter models. Of course, "shorter" is generally still at least 5'7.

"Down to 5'7"????   READ... the OP is 5'6!!!!!!!!

Jun 06 10 09:27 am Link

Photographer

Yves Duchamp - Femme

Posts: 24436

Virginia Beach, Virginia, US

Michael Bots wrote:

Didn't start as a celebrity - her first job was working a department store sales counter.  Met her over 10 years ago, she has that undefinable "it" quality.

And 5'2" Dita would not have been signed anywhere or fronted campaigns were it not for her celebrity.

Jun 06 10 09:31 am Link

Photographer

IDphotos

Posts: 542

Glendale, California, US

In my humble opinion, agencies list 5'9" as a minimum height requirement as a deterrent. Let's say that they remove the height requirement, then everyone and their mother would be trying to contact them to be signed. I can only imagine the hassle that they would have to deal with. If an agency's target market is high fashion, then they have to keep up with what's popular. Having too many models that is outside of what their customers want would require more maintenance cost for the agencies to find the shorter models jobs and dilute the agency's brand labeling. The agencies know what their target market is and they have to maintain a certain pedigree that they know will make them money. The bottom line is that it's all about money. If they make more than 80% of their money from models that are taller than 5'9" then it makes no sense for them to hire too many models below that height.

Jun 06 10 10:13 am Link