Forums > Digital Art and Retouching > Automatic Skin Smoothing.

Photographer

ninjaprints

Posts: 2457

London, England, United Kingdom

had a brief tinker with it with very little success but will give it a more in depth going over when I have a chance.

Appreciate your efforts however, always good to see someone putting something out there for free

Feb 24 11 04:15 pm Link

Retoucher

George Thomson

Posts: 699

Concord, California, US

https://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/228579_202097786497990_149810035060099_504258_4083742_n.jpg

CS5:
NEW:
- QuickMask friendly
- preview (select a region and press GET)
- quick skin-select button

Limitations:
- RGB, 8bit

No Warranties whatsoever (and all that Jazz)

Writing this, came to having to deal with numerous PS bugs, very poor script documentation, undeclared functions, extremely slow execution of the code... and I'm somewhat surprised I got it working even this much.
To be hones I get the feeling someone in Adobe intentionally keeps the scripting capability a mess. anyway....

The Preview uses slightly different algorithm inside Flash (so there may be slight difference between the preview and PS), but should give you a good idea where to make the corrections. Strength-slider affects only PS, not the Preview.

If there is a lot of requests I *may* try to port it for CS4 (no CS3 ver. is possible).


-have fun

May 13 11 02:03 pm Link

Retoucher

George Thomson

Posts: 699

Concord, California, US

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UANATlah8_8&hd=1

(a quick example how you can use version 6.1)

May 16 11 10:59 am Link

Retoucher

George Thomson

Posts: 699

Concord, California, US

UPDATE: V6.2
links removed


Instructions here:
http://www.facebook.com/PhotonicTools?sk=info

May 18 11 11:32 am Link

Digital Artist

Michael C Pearson

Posts: 1349

Agoura Hills, California, US

I've been having lots of trouble with this version. Most of the time I try it on a color image it says something like "version mismach/ no image," then even if I open a new image the error message stays on the panel.

May 18 11 11:16 pm Link

Retoucher

George Thomson

Posts: 699

Concord, California, US

MP Retouch wrote:
I've been having lots of trouble with this version. Most of the time I try it on a color image it says something like "version mismach/ no image," then even if I open a new image the error message stays on the panel.

click on it and it will turn off

this version is only 8bit RGB compatible

May 18 11 11:22 pm Link

Photographer

Julian Marsalis

Posts: 1191

Austin, Texas, US

Facebook page mia?

Aug 19 11 08:42 am Link

Retoucher

George Thomson

Posts: 699

Concord, California, US

shot-dead wink

Sep 12 11 12:21 am Link

Retoucher

George Thomson

Posts: 699

Concord, California, US

btw, make sure you work with a temp file! before you use the plugin.

(not with your original psd)

I did find on a few occasions the scripting interrupted and later there was mishandling the file.
(most often when you have too big image, and you interact with PS before maskings and other manipulations are complete, mainly the selective preview)

so if you have that problem, do not use selective preview,
and !wait until scripting is fully complete!


I don't plan on updating it for the moment, so handle with care.

If new versions show, they will be binary, not scripted.
(but I wouldn't hold my breath...
that is why I shut off the FB page for the moment)

Oct 15 11 03:58 am Link

Photographer

photoimager

Posts: 5164

Stoke-on-Trent, England, United Kingdom

Monthly  bump ?

Oct 15 11 04:18 am Link

Retoucher

George Thomson

Posts: 699

Concord, California, US

photoimager wrote:
Monthly  bump ?

sure... can't you see the whole big marketing campaign going on here

Oct 15 11 04:28 am Link

Photographer

YandS Photography

Posts: 359

Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia

Just tried it
Really nice plugin.
Thank you for the hard work

Is there a manual on how you can use it though?
I want to understand on what each slider or button do

And somehow on the panel I did not get the preview

Oct 15 11 07:45 am Link

Retoucher

George Thomson

Posts: 699

Concord, California, US

YanS Photography wrote:
Just tried it
Really nice plugin.
Thank you for the hard work

Is there a manual on how you can use it though?
I want to understand on what each slider or button do

And somehow on the panel I did not get the preview

Exact-Var (slider) : sets how wide the corrective band is

Select (button): selects skin-colours

GET (button): will get a preview from the selection
(use Rectangular Marquee tool to show the area of interest, and press GET so you can see a real-time preview of your adjustments only in this sector)

Mask (check): turns on/off the skin masks for the object

Pores-Blotches: sets what you are targeting to correct (small r vs. large r)

Rasterize: rasterizes the layer, creates black mask and turns it off.
(to have only targeted corrections, click on the mask and paint with white only where you want the corrections)

Strength: ... self-evident...
suggested use it to be stronger for "pores" (very small r) or less for blotches


for the "preview" make a selection, and press "GET"
(it's buggy but should have shown you something... it's also possible that it may not work as expected on all PS versions)

hope this clears things up a bit,
cheers

Oct 15 11 08:32 am Link

Photographer

YandS Photography

Posts: 359

Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia

Yeah the preview does not work in mine

And after I restart the photoshop, it now say version mismatch and it does not work for new files.
Oddly it still work with the original tiff files that I used to try it before but not new tiff files.

Oct 15 11 08:49 am Link

Retoucher

George Thomson

Posts: 699

Concord, California, US

YanS Photography wrote:
Yeah the preview does not work in mine

And after I restart the photoshop, it now say version mismatch and it does not work for new files.
Oddly it still work with the original tiff files that I used to try it before but not new tiff files.

there's an 8bit restriction which may give you the same message.
ie make sure you are in 8bit RGB

(yes.. it's an artificial limitation to separate a possible "pro" version with a "free" one... but after some research didn't make sense to create the "pro")

Oct 15 11 08:54 am Link

Photographer

YandS Photography

Posts: 359

Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia

Photon Mayhem wrote:
there's an 8bit restriction which may give you the same message.
ie make sure you are in 8bit RGB

(yes.. it's an artificial limitation to separate a possible "pro" version with a "free" one... but after some research didn't make sense to create the "pro")

You are right
When I change to 8 bit it work again.
Thank you for your explanation.
It work great.

I'm still playing with it but one thing I didn't understand is the rasterize button.
Why do I need to rasterize?
If just because of the mask, wouldn't I be able to work on the mask without rasterizing?

Oct 15 11 09:52 am Link

Retoucher

George Thomson

Posts: 699

Concord, California, US

YanS Photography wrote:

You are right
When I change to 8 bit it work again.
Thank you for your explanation.
It work great.

I'm still playing with it but one thing I didn't understand is the rasterize button.
Why do I need to rasterize?
If just because of the mask, wouldn't I be able to work on the mask without rasterizing?

by default it masks the skin,
it's sort of a shortcut for faster workflow

Oct 15 11 10:11 am Link

Photographer

YandS Photography

Posts: 359

Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia

Photon Mayhem wrote:
by default it masks the skin,
it's sort of a shortcut for faster workflow

I see
well I do find another reason why I should rasterize
If it is not rasterized, when you resize the image you will need to readjust.

Oct 15 11 11:39 am Link

Photographer

iRoshk

Posts: 3

Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

Photon Mayhem wrote:
(yes.. it's an artificial limitation to separate a possible "pro" version with a "free" one... but after some research didn't make sense to create the "pro")

Since the PRO version is not programmed to appear in the near future, could you please, pretty please, unlock the 16bit in the latest version of the plugin?
Please?  smile

Nov 15 11 10:32 am Link

Retoucher

George Thomson

Posts: 699

Concord, California, US

new version coming soon

if there is interest for a 16 bit, RGB/CMYK/Lab version, I may open a kickstart.com project, so let me know

Jun 13 12 01:46 pm Link

Photographer

A_Nova_Photography

Posts: 8652

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, US

I'd be interested in 16 bit since it's all I work in...

Jun 13 12 04:18 pm Link

Retoucher

George Thomson

Posts: 699

Concord, California, US

if you have any requests, now is the time
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-T9rfOVue1Do/T-Cfj6WHFUI/AAAAAAAAGKI/jbUxxcIsUe0/s358/skinsmooth-2012-comingsoon.jpg

Jun 19 12 08:51 am Link

Retoucher

ArmanaGiedre

Posts: 16

Kupiškis, Panevėžio, Lithuania

I can't download the plug-in. Could anyone send it to me? Thanks in advance.

Jun 19 12 10:09 am Link

Retoucher

Digital Autopsy

Posts: 54

Orlando, Florida, US

ArmanaGiedre wrote:
I can't download the plug-in. Could anyone send it to me? Thanks in advance.

I looked, the link to download it keeps looping back to his page...

Jun 19 12 11:55 am Link

Photographer

Blue Mini Photography

Posts: 1703

Tempe, Arizona, US

Same problem here.  Tried Chrome and IE.  sad 

Really wanted to try this.

Jun 19 12 12:11 pm Link

Retoucher

George Thomson

Posts: 699

Concord, California, US

all old versions have been removed

there will be a new version with major updates in a few days
when it's ready I will post it.

Jun 19 12 03:16 pm Link

Retoucher

George Thomson

Posts: 699

Concord, California, US

coming really soon....

https://g4.img-dpreview.com/6E27BDEF903D4DEF8027E0F7650E8BC0.jpg

Jun 23 12 04:27 am Link

Photographer

You Were Hotter Online

Posts: 63

New York, New York, US

Hmmm I would like to try this out, I have some very demanding clients who need images ASAP

Jun 23 12 08:11 am Link

Retoucher

George Thomson

Posts: 699

Concord, California, US

you can download the FREE 8bit version through here:


kickstarter.com declined to host project as it is not "creative enough" for them so...

when there's new info I will post, in the meantime - "share"

Jun 23 12 10:30 am Link

Photographer

KonstantKarma

Posts: 2513

Campobello, South Carolina, US

Groovy - This is what we call Wavelet Decompose in GIMP (2008). It is manual however, need to gaussian blur/heal in the individual layers.

Good tutorial for the lost folks:
http://blog.patdavid.net/2011/12/gettin … ching.html

Downloadable free at http://registry.gimp.org/node/11742 .

Wavelet Denoise http://registry.gimp.org/node/4235 is the automatic version but only works well when trying to get rid of blemishes of the same size.

Good to see you Adobe guys catchin' on. https://www.thelightninglane.com/forums/images/smilies/Smilies/Thumb%20Up.gif

Jun 23 12 10:41 am Link

Retoucher

George Thomson

Posts: 699

Concord, California, US

KonstantKarma wrote:
Groovy - This is what we call Wavelet Decompose in GIMP (2008). It is manual however, need to gaussian blur/heal in the individual layers.

Good tutorial for the lost folks:
http://blog.patdavid.net/2011/12/gettin … ching.html

Downloadable free at http://registry.gimp.org/node/11742 .

Wavelet Denoise http://registry.gimp.org/node/4235 is the automatic version but only works well when trying to get rid of blemishes of the same size.

Good to see you Adobe guys catchin' on. https://www.thelightninglane.com/forums/images/smilies/Smilies/Thumb%20Up.gif

no matter how many wavelets you slice it, in the "tutorial" the results look a bit off... sometimes "more" is not necessary better


anyway..

Colour Profile bug fixed !
(fairly big one)

(click on Download to get the updated free version)


kickstarter.com declined to host project as it is not "creative enough" for them so...

when there's new info I will post, in the meantime - "share"

Jun 24 12 09:40 am Link

Photographer

patdavid

Posts: 43

Mobile, Alabama, US

Photon Mayhem wrote:
no matter how many wavelets you slice it, in the "tutorial" the results look a bit off... sometimes "more" is not necessary

If you'd have read the tutorial, I state multiple times to approach it with a light hand. It's not a technique for the heavy handed.

If you'd like to, you photoshop guys can do the same thing as wavelet decompose by generating multiple high-pass layers at different sizes, and grain merging them back to your original image.

I'll probably write something up on doing it manually. There's no good reason to approach it any other way besides saving a little time I think.

Jun 24 12 04:04 pm Link

Photographer

The Art of Churchwell

Posts: 3171

QUEENS VILLAGE, New York, US

The Art of Churchwell wrote:
I really like your skin softner

++1 still

Jun 25 12 09:03 am Link

Retoucher

George Thomson

Posts: 699

Concord, California, US

patdavid wrote:
If you'd have read the tutorial, I state multiple times to approach it with a light hand. It's not a technique for the heavy handed.

If you'd like to, you photoshop guys can do the same thing as wavelet decompose by generating multiple high-pass layers at different sizes, and grain merging them back to your original image.

I'll probably write something up on doing it manually. There's no good reason to approach it any other way besides saving a little time I think.

I didn't mean "hard hand" but the number of wavelets. In most cases 1 or 2, well-targeted corrections will be sufficient.

Skin Smooth does it with sliders and preview, I didn't understand well how the plugin for Gimp picks the wavelets (to be honest I just glimpsed the tutorial and its results).

I agree about the reason for saving time,
but lets say - adjusting 6 wavelets will probably add to it, than save it.

PS is horrible when it comes to GB a selected region (it adds information outside the selection and halos on the edges occur). If Gimp does a better job in this it will have much better results, with even less need for manual corrections.
So if you add a way to target a specific band (with a preview) and add automatic skin selection I think you will save a lot more time. (and have a Skin Smooth version for Gimp smile )

Jun 25 12 09:33 am Link

Photographer

patdavid

Posts: 43

Mobile, Alabama, US

Photon Mayhem wrote:
I agree about the reason for saving time,
but lets say - adjusting 6 wavelets will probably add to it, than save it.

The plugin will generate as many wavelets as you like, but the combination method reproduces the exact same image - so you can just pick/choose which wavelet scale contains the objects you want to modify, and then just retouch that particular scale (no need to touch all 6 scales for instance).

Photon Mayhem wrote:
PS is horrible when it comes to GB a selected region (it adds information outside the selection and halos on the edges occur). If Gimp does a better job in this it will have much better results, with even less need for manual corrections.

Nope, still a similar problem with GIMP. smile


Photon Mayhem wrote:
So if you add a way to target a specific band (with a preview) and add automatic skin selection I think you will save a lot more time. (and have a Skin Smooth version for Gimp smile )

I personally like having the option to target specific areas of an image in a deconstructed wavelet scale (sometimes I like to touchup something other than skin, for instance), but I could see some sort of automated method being handy for some people for sure! wink

Jun 25 12 01:02 pm Link

Retoucher

George Thomson

Posts: 699

Concord, California, US

patdavid wrote:
I personally like having the option to target specific areas of an image in a deconstructed wavelet

Sure.. with SkinSmooth you just press the [split] button and you have it.
since you already have chosen where you need the correction you get the split right where you want it.

the problem of predefined number of wavelets is that you never know how many you require to target exactly what you need. You can have what you need to correct spread across several wavelets, or have one with a band much wider then necessary.

Jun 25 12 04:58 pm Link

Photographer

patdavid

Posts: 43

Mobile, Alabama, US

Photon Mayhem wrote:
the problem of predefined number of wavelets is that you never know how many you require to target exactly what you need. You can have what you need to correct spread across several wavelets, or have one with a band much wider then necessary.

Absolutely, though I have never found this to be a problem in real-world use.  If I have too many wavelets, I can always ditch the ones created, and just use a smaller set of scales.  If I want to separate control between pores and freckles, for instance, I'll just increase the wavelets to what I need.  Usually the features are within one or two scales depending on subject size to image (or how much the subject fills the frame).

Either way, it's another method to keep in your pocket if you want full control over what you're after.  I should get off my butt and write up a manual method or just write a PS action for generating the scales... (lazy wins at the moment, I guess).

Jun 25 12 08:01 pm Link

Retoucher

George Thomson

Posts: 699

Concord, California, US

hopefully there will not be more surprises,
and the plugin will be available next week

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-Xwll4mJD1Lk/T-4rFJ0bBCI/AAAAAAAAGM4/Z9IooAht1-E/s341/SkinSmooth_v5.jpg

Jun 29 12 03:15 pm Link

Photographer

You Were Hotter Online

Posts: 63

New York, New York, US

Photon Mayhem wrote:
hopefully there will not be more surprises,
and the plugin will be available next week

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-Xwll4mJD1Lk/T-4rFJ0bBCI/AAAAAAAAGM4/Z9IooAht1-E/s341/SkinSmooth_v5.jpg

cool beans, i need to make more people look hotter online wink

Jun 30 12 04:45 am Link

Retoucher

George Thomson

Posts: 699

Concord, California, US

note to everyone:

compatible with: CS5, CS5.1, CS6, Win| Mac

if you want it, msg me your e-mail (in private here) and I'll e-mail it to you.

It will be for your personal use,
so I'm asking you to Not post this version online.

Jun 30 12 07:45 am Link