Photographer
ninjaprints
Posts: 2457
London, England, United Kingdom
had a brief tinker with it with very little success but will give it a more in depth going over when I have a chance. Appreciate your efforts however, always good to see someone putting something out there for free
Retoucher
George Thomson
Posts: 699
Concord, California, US
CS5: NEW: - QuickMask friendly - preview (select a region and press GET) - quick skin-select button Limitations: - RGB, 8bit No Warranties whatsoever (and all that Jazz) Writing this, came to having to deal with numerous PS bugs, very poor script documentation, undeclared functions, extremely slow execution of the code... and I'm somewhat surprised I got it working even this much. To be hones I get the feeling someone in Adobe intentionally keeps the scripting capability a mess. anyway.... The Preview uses slightly different algorithm inside Flash (so there may be slight difference between the preview and PS), but should give you a good idea where to make the corrections. Strength-slider affects only PS, not the Preview. If there is a lot of requests I *may* try to port it for CS4 (no CS3 ver. is possible). -have fun
Digital Artist
Michael C Pearson
Posts: 1349
Agoura Hills, California, US
I've been having lots of trouble with this version. Most of the time I try it on a color image it says something like "version mismach/ no image," then even if I open a new image the error message stays on the panel.
Retoucher
George Thomson
Posts: 699
Concord, California, US
MP Retouch wrote: I've been having lots of trouble with this version. Most of the time I try it on a color image it says something like "version mismach/ no image," then even if I open a new image the error message stays on the panel. click on it and it will turn off this version is only 8bit RGB compatible
Retoucher
George Thomson
Posts: 699
Concord, California, US
btw, make sure you work with a temp file! before you use the plugin. (not with your original psd) I did find on a few occasions the scripting interrupted and later there was mishandling the file. (most often when you have too big image, and you interact with PS before maskings and other manipulations are complete, mainly the selective preview) so if you have that problem, do not use selective preview, and !wait until scripting is fully complete! I don't plan on updating it for the moment, so handle with care. If new versions show, they will be binary, not scripted. (but I wouldn't hold my breath... that is why I shut off the FB page for the moment)
Photographer
photoimager
Posts: 5164
Stoke-on-Trent, England, United Kingdom
Retoucher
George Thomson
Posts: 699
Concord, California, US
photoimager wrote: Monthly bump ? sure... can't you see the whole big marketing campaign going on here
Photographer
YandS Photography
Posts: 359
Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
Just tried it Really nice plugin. Thank you for the hard work Is there a manual on how you can use it though? I want to understand on what each slider or button do And somehow on the panel I did not get the preview
Retoucher
George Thomson
Posts: 699
Concord, California, US
YanS Photography wrote: Just tried it Really nice plugin. Thank you for the hard work Is there a manual on how you can use it though? I want to understand on what each slider or button do And somehow on the panel I did not get the preview Exact-Var (slider) : sets how wide the corrective band is Select (button): selects skin-colours GET (button): will get a preview from the selection (use Rectangular Marquee tool to show the area of interest, and press GET so you can see a real-time preview of your adjustments only in this sector) Mask (check): turns on/off the skin masks for the object Pores-Blotches: sets what you are targeting to correct (small r vs. large r) Rasterize: rasterizes the layer, creates black mask and turns it off. (to have only targeted corrections, click on the mask and paint with white only where you want the corrections) Strength: ... self-evident... suggested use it to be stronger for "pores" (very small r) or less for blotches for the "preview" make a selection, and press "GET" (it's buggy but should have shown you something... it's also possible that it may not work as expected on all PS versions) hope this clears things up a bit, cheers
Photographer
YandS Photography
Posts: 359
Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
Yeah the preview does not work in mine And after I restart the photoshop, it now say version mismatch and it does not work for new files. Oddly it still work with the original tiff files that I used to try it before but not new tiff files.
Retoucher
George Thomson
Posts: 699
Concord, California, US
YanS Photography wrote: Yeah the preview does not work in mine And after I restart the photoshop, it now say version mismatch and it does not work for new files. Oddly it still work with the original tiff files that I used to try it before but not new tiff files. there's an 8bit restriction which may give you the same message. ie make sure you are in 8bit RGB (yes.. it's an artificial limitation to separate a possible "pro" version with a "free" one... but after some research didn't make sense to create the "pro")
Photographer
YandS Photography
Posts: 359
Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
Photon Mayhem wrote: there's an 8bit restriction which may give you the same message. ie make sure you are in 8bit RGB (yes.. it's an artificial limitation to separate a possible "pro" version with a "free" one... but after some research didn't make sense to create the "pro") You are right When I change to 8 bit it work again. Thank you for your explanation. It work great. I'm still playing with it but one thing I didn't understand is the rasterize button. Why do I need to rasterize? If just because of the mask, wouldn't I be able to work on the mask without rasterizing?
Retoucher
George Thomson
Posts: 699
Concord, California, US
YanS Photography wrote: You are right When I change to 8 bit it work again. Thank you for your explanation. It work great. I'm still playing with it but one thing I didn't understand is the rasterize button. Why do I need to rasterize? If just because of the mask, wouldn't I be able to work on the mask without rasterizing? by default it masks the skin, it's sort of a shortcut for faster workflow
Photographer
YandS Photography
Posts: 359
Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
Photon Mayhem wrote: by default it masks the skin, it's sort of a shortcut for faster workflow I see well I do find another reason why I should rasterize If it is not rasterized, when you resize the image you will need to readjust.
Photographer
iRoshk
Posts: 3
Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Photon Mayhem wrote: (yes.. it's an artificial limitation to separate a possible "pro" version with a "free" one... but after some research didn't make sense to create the "pro") Since the PRO version is not programmed to appear in the near future, could you please, pretty please, unlock the 16bit in the latest version of the plugin? Please?
Retoucher
George Thomson
Posts: 699
Concord, California, US
new version coming soon if there is interest for a 16 bit, RGB/CMYK/Lab version, I may open a kickstart.com project, so let me know
Photographer
A_Nova_Photography
Posts: 8652
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, US
I'd be interested in 16 bit since it's all I work in...
Retoucher
George Thomson
Posts: 699
Concord, California, US
if you have any requests, now is the time
Retoucher
ArmanaGiedre
Posts: 16
Kupiškis, Panevėžio, Lithuania
I can't download the plug-in. Could anyone send it to me? Thanks in advance.
Retoucher
Digital Autopsy
Posts: 54
Orlando, Florida, US
ArmanaGiedre wrote: I can't download the plug-in. Could anyone send it to me? Thanks in advance. I looked, the link to download it keeps looping back to his page...
Photographer
Blue Mini Photography
Posts: 1703
Tempe, Arizona, US
Same problem here. Tried Chrome and IE. Really wanted to try this.
Retoucher
George Thomson
Posts: 699
Concord, California, US
all old versions have been removed there will be a new version with major updates in a few days when it's ready I will post it.
Retoucher
George Thomson
Posts: 699
Concord, California, US
coming really soon....
Photographer
You Were Hotter Online
Posts: 63
New York, New York, US
Hmmm I would like to try this out, I have some very demanding clients who need images ASAP
Retoucher
George Thomson
Posts: 699
Concord, California, US
you can download the FREE 8bit version through here: kickstarter.com declined to host project as it is not "creative enough" for them so... when there's new info I will post, in the meantime - "share"
Photographer
KonstantKarma
Posts: 2513
Campobello, South Carolina, US
Retoucher
George Thomson
Posts: 699
Concord, California, US
KonstantKarma wrote: Groovy - This is what we call Wavelet Decompose in GIMP (2008). It is manual however, need to gaussian blur/heal in the individual layers. Good tutorial for the lost folks: http://blog.patdavid.net/2011/12/gettin … ching.html Downloadable free at http://registry.gimp.org/node/11742 . Wavelet Denoise http://registry.gimp.org/node/4235 is the automatic version but only works well when trying to get rid of blemishes of the same size. Good to see you Adobe guys catchin' on. no matter how many wavelets you slice it, in the "tutorial" the results look a bit off... sometimes "more" is not necessary better anyway.. Colour Profile bug fixed ! (fairly big one) (click on Download to get the updated free version) kickstarter.com declined to host project as it is not "creative enough" for them so... when there's new info I will post, in the meantime - "share"
Photographer
patdavid
Posts: 43
Mobile, Alabama, US
Photon Mayhem wrote: no matter how many wavelets you slice it, in the "tutorial" the results look a bit off... sometimes "more" is not necessary If you'd have read the tutorial, I state multiple times to approach it with a light hand. It's not a technique for the heavy handed. If you'd like to, you photoshop guys can do the same thing as wavelet decompose by generating multiple high-pass layers at different sizes, and grain merging them back to your original image. I'll probably write something up on doing it manually. There's no good reason to approach it any other way besides saving a little time I think.
Photographer
The Art of Churchwell
Posts: 3171
QUEENS VILLAGE, New York, US
The Art of Churchwell wrote: I really like your skin softner ++1 still
Retoucher
George Thomson
Posts: 699
Concord, California, US
patdavid wrote: If you'd have read the tutorial, I state multiple times to approach it with a light hand. It's not a technique for the heavy handed. If you'd like to, you photoshop guys can do the same thing as wavelet decompose by generating multiple high-pass layers at different sizes, and grain merging them back to your original image. I'll probably write something up on doing it manually. There's no good reason to approach it any other way besides saving a little time I think. I didn't mean "hard hand" but the number of wavelets. In most cases 1 or 2, well-targeted corrections will be sufficient. Skin Smooth does it with sliders and preview, I didn't understand well how the plugin for Gimp picks the wavelets (to be honest I just glimpsed the tutorial and its results). I agree about the reason for saving time, but lets say - adjusting 6 wavelets will probably add to it, than save it. PS is horrible when it comes to GB a selected region (it adds information outside the selection and halos on the edges occur). If Gimp does a better job in this it will have much better results, with even less need for manual corrections. So if you add a way to target a specific band (with a preview) and add automatic skin selection I think you will save a lot more time. (and have a Skin Smooth version for Gimp )
Photographer
patdavid
Posts: 43
Mobile, Alabama, US
Photon Mayhem wrote: I agree about the reason for saving time, but lets say - adjusting 6 wavelets will probably add to it, than save it. The plugin will generate as many wavelets as you like, but the combination method reproduces the exact same image - so you can just pick/choose which wavelet scale contains the objects you want to modify, and then just retouch that particular scale (no need to touch all 6 scales for instance).
Photon Mayhem wrote: PS is horrible when it comes to GB a selected region (it adds information outside the selection and halos on the edges occur). If Gimp does a better job in this it will have much better results, with even less need for manual corrections. Nope, still a similar problem with GIMP.
Photon Mayhem wrote: So if you add a way to target a specific band (with a preview) and add automatic skin selection I think you will save a lot more time. (and have a Skin Smooth version for Gimp ) I personally like having the option to target specific areas of an image in a deconstructed wavelet scale (sometimes I like to touchup something other than skin, for instance), but I could see some sort of automated method being handy for some people for sure!
Retoucher
George Thomson
Posts: 699
Concord, California, US
patdavid wrote: I personally like having the option to target specific areas of an image in a deconstructed wavelet Sure.. with SkinSmooth you just press the [split] button and you have it. since you already have chosen where you need the correction you get the split right where you want it. the problem of predefined number of wavelets is that you never know how many you require to target exactly what you need. You can have what you need to correct spread across several wavelets, or have one with a band much wider then necessary.
Photographer
patdavid
Posts: 43
Mobile, Alabama, US
Photon Mayhem wrote: the problem of predefined number of wavelets is that you never know how many you require to target exactly what you need. You can have what you need to correct spread across several wavelets, or have one with a band much wider then necessary. Absolutely, though I have never found this to be a problem in real-world use. If I have too many wavelets, I can always ditch the ones created, and just use a smaller set of scales. If I want to separate control between pores and freckles, for instance, I'll just increase the wavelets to what I need. Usually the features are within one or two scales depending on subject size to image (or how much the subject fills the frame). Either way, it's another method to keep in your pocket if you want full control over what you're after. I should get off my butt and write up a manual method or just write a PS action for generating the scales... (lazy wins at the moment, I guess).
Retoucher
George Thomson
Posts: 699
Concord, California, US
hopefully there will not be more surprises, and the plugin will be available next week
Photographer
You Were Hotter Online
Posts: 63
New York, New York, US
Photon Mayhem wrote: hopefully there will not be more surprises, and the plugin will be available next week
cool beans, i need to make more people look hotter online
Retoucher
George Thomson
Posts: 699
Concord, California, US
note to everyone: compatible with: CS5, CS5.1, CS6, Win| Mac if you want it, msg me your e-mail (in private here) and I'll e-mail it to you. It will be for your personal use, so I'm asking you to Not post this version online.
|