|
Forums >
Photography Talk >
I love film!
Love the shot of the recliners in the sea phillip - might steal the idea and put a model on them. Oct 07 12 08:21 am Link Thank you Wild... It was by pure luck they were in the surf. Large storm rolled through the night before, and these were shot at dawn before they took them out. One more. A bit longer exposure, plus some sea spray on the lens.  - Used a yellow filter on this one. Had to play with front/rear swings and tilts in an effort to get it all in focus. That tested me somewhat.  Oct 07 12 09:02 am Link I love film, to watch and use. But seeing all these great examples makes me realize I need to practise a lot more... Oct 08 12 05:07 am Link Mamiya RZ67 & 110mm f2.8 & Fuji Acros 100 in HC110  Oct 08 12 05:17 am Link  Mamiya RZ67 + 180mm + Kodak Tri X in HC110 Oct 08 12 05:19 am Link
Post hidden on Oct 08, 2012 02:46 pm
Reason: 18+ Images Oct 08 12 05:23 am Link I'm loving this thread. Nice to see so many MF, LF n Mamiya users here. I thought I was the last man standing, glad I'm not alone. . Oct 08 12 05:29 am Link Mamiya RB67, Fuji Neopan Acros @ISO 80, Rodinal:   More on Facebook I'm in love with the dynamic range and tonal richness of large format. Sinar F2, HP5+ 4x5 sheet film @IS0 320, Xtol:  Oct 08 12 09:46 am Link Both from a few days ago... RB67  Rolleiflex  Oct 08 12 03:00 pm Link
Post hidden on Oct 08, 2012 10:29 pm
Reason: 18+ Images Oct 08 12 10:13 pm Link  Moderator Warning!Please do NOT post 18+ images with an [img] tag so they show. You may post the link to them and mark them as 18+ Thank you Oct 08 12 10:31 pm Link -The Dave- wrote: Ok can you delete my post then. Oct 08 12 10:41 pm Link Graphlex Graphic View 4x5 Arista 100  -  - Oct 09 12 04:41 am Link  Exposure around a minute. HP5 pushed to 800/developed in xtol 1:1 Oct 09 12 09:30 am Link PhillipM wrote: Hey Phill, tell me more about how you blured the DOF in your images? For some reason it dosent make any sense in the analog optical world. Oct 09 12 10:52 am Link The F-Stop wrote: Front tilt and swing -- note that that was taken on a graphic view Oct 09 12 11:56 am Link Someting else is happening here. Selective focus only works in digital. I've done LF using tilts n swings n can't get the chest of the girl in focus, her legs n shoulders out and the background behind an out of focus area in focus no mater how crafty you are with tilts n swings.. it's analog imposable. Take a closer look? Oct 09 12 07:08 pm Link The F-Stop wrote: Id be real careful about saying what can and cant be done...just because you cant do it or see how it could be done doesnt mean it cant be Oct 09 12 07:20 pm Link +1 It's not only the front that can tilt, shift and swing, the back also has those movements, combined you can do some pretty freaky stuff. Oct 09 12 07:30 pm Link Some stunning shots there, but this was my favourite. I'd love to get my hands on that camera. Fred Greissing wrote: Oct 09 12 08:24 pm Link I USED to love film. This image was shot in 1974 with an 8x10 View in Yosemite Park. The model is Twinka. and it's 18+ https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/28107/0#/3817408 Oct 09 12 08:41 pm Link Film based images often have qualities that, to me, are more pleasing to see than non film based photography. I have shot more digital than film though i am currently selling a lot of gear to set up a 4x5 kit that will include a scanner. This shot was made a few years ago using 35mm Ilford Delta 3200 and window light. Definitely 18+ (the moderator said so) http://www.flickr.com/photos/30041161@N … /lightbox/ Oct 10 12 01:55 am Link Hey F-Stop: Catchlight hit it on the head. Tilt/Swings gave me those results. A couple more film shots.  -  -  -  Oct 10 12 04:09 am Link From a 5am trek through Central Park with my RB67 and some Portra this weekend. Finally getting around to color developing at home.  Oct 10 12 07:05 am Link Roy Hubbard wrote: Are you using bulk C-41 chemicals, or one of the prepackaged kits? If the latter, which one, and how have you found it? Oct 10 12 07:13 am Link Nice work Phill! I've never seen focusing done on 2 planes like that, you must have had that thing in a knot? I've worked with Scheimpflug princiapal but never in that way.. interesting. First I thought it might have been a diffusing tool when printing, then as I looked closer, it just seemed weird n looked more like a lens aberation.. amost a maniscus effect. Still alot to learn, thanks. Oct 10 12 07:13 am Link R Michael Walker wrote: hey, Twinka without Imogen /to those who know\ Oct 10 12 07:24 am Link Thanks Fstop.... She was quite easy to shoot in that fashion, just because I was viewing while making adjustments until I got what I wanted. That damn rock above took me 15 minutes to figure out, how to get it all in focus, using swing/tilts and focusing...  Another one from my GV... Another one of my H.S.Senior girls allowed me to play. I do enjoy shooting with it, but wish now I had bought a field camera instead of this monorail box. It's a very clean, damn near brand new looking camera, and I just had the lens CLA too, and now have a case for it. The Seattle trip damn near killed me toting it up the Mtn.s along with my RB67 in my backpack.  Oct 10 12 07:25 am Link Colin Doust wrote: nice, butt, I don't see the NC warning need -- ? -- got one at the portal also. Oct 10 12 07:28 am Link AgX wrote: I'm using the Tetenal C-41 1 liter kit. It's more or less as simple as black and white, and I've found the results pleasing. The chemicals can knock you for a bit of a loop if you don't have decent ventilation and keep at it for an extended period. Oct 10 12 07:31 am Link PhillipM wrote: maybe a Pacemaker, before you need a pacemaker. Oct 10 12 07:38 am Link  Star trails.  30 minute exposure, ISO 400, f/2(I think?). Oct 10 12 07:40 am Link PhillipM wrote: Man that has some 'pop'! Oct 10 12 07:41 am Link Phill, That RB is 12 pounds n hauling a VC is just plain old sherpa work. I stopped taking my RBs backpacking a long time ago but do take my smaller, not much weight savings, ETRS now. Go look at a Linhoff, you'll be very happy to see it weighs alot less and folds flat. Monorails are a PIA. What has always killed me about LF was not only the time it took to get it all perfect n focused... but after all that, insert the film n the damn thing moved on ya.. HOLY CRAP! Start over again. You have to be a very patient man or that thing goes flying off a cliff. Seismic.. nice shot, gotta love the 50mm on the RB. Oct 10 12 11:20 am Link annie lomowitz wrote: The 18+ warning and link instead of [img] is needed because of the rules about posting NSFW images in the threads. Oct 10 12 11:37 am Link Here is a self portrait that my Grandfather did back in the 30's. Shot using a single frame and two large mirrors.  Oct 10 12 11:42 am Link The F-Stop wrote: Don't you know it. Oct 10 12 11:56 am Link There is some beautiful photography here. Hopefully I won't drag it down too much.  Nikon F4 w/Nikkor 105 1.8 and Ilford XP-2 Oct 14 12 07:06 pm Link I have a ton of Kodak Ektar 100 in 120. Why are you putting 35mm in your MF camera? I don't understand the point...? Oct 14 12 07:15 pm Link V Laroche wrote: Same reason I sometimes shoot 120 or 35mm in my 4x5. To do something different. Oct 14 12 08:00 pm Link |
