Model
Victoria Gevorkov
Posts: 98
Kansas City, Missouri, US
Haii ! I have a few photos from the same set that make up the first two rows of my port and I need your help deciding which two from the set to keep. Thanks! -Victoria Gevorkov
Photographer
dvwrght
Posts: 1300
Phoenix, Arizona, US
do you think you're likely to find paying work in that genre?
Model
Victoria Gevorkov
Posts: 98
Kansas City, Missouri, US
This set was paid work for a salon. So, we'll see.. If anything its diverse.
Photographer
dvwrght
Posts: 1300
Phoenix, Arizona, US
Victoria Gevorkov wrote: This set was paid work for a salon. So, we'll see.. If anything its diverse. well, congrats on the job! i find that models seem to think diversity or variety is really important in a portfolio, when i think the opposite is true. for example, a fashion model's portfolio on the agency's website will have 10 or 15 strong fashion images... not a few fashion shots, some glamour stuff, a couple cellphone self-shots, and a few random shots that don't make much sense at all.
Model
Victoria Gevorkov
Posts: 98
Kansas City, Missouri, US
problem is I am not exactly sure which category I fall under.... considering I am not industry height and all especially. So I just take work as it comes.
Photographer
Drew Smith Photography
Posts: 5214
Nottingham, England, United Kingdom
Phew - I'd keep number 8 only. If I may say, there seems like a lot of effort gone in to the wardrobe and hair in some of those shots for pretty awful photos. That's not your fault, but it's a shame though.
Photographer
KModel Photography
Posts: 280
Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
Victoria Gevorkov wrote: .. I need your help deciding which two from the set to keep. Thanks! -Victoria Gevorkov There's a huge number of photos there, many of which are just not professional or helpful at all. You could keep about 6 which show you are a professional model and are worth paying for a job. Your portfolio is your ticket to paying jobs, its not a random photo bucket. You want at least a good clear headshot which shows your eyes and other facial features. You want a good upper body shot which shows your shoulders and all. Some full length shots front, side and back which show off your shape and proportions, and a few shots which show you can pose and sell product. You do have a few good pics in there, but they are getting lost with the crap All the best.
Photographer
Lee_Photography
Posts: 9863
Minneapolis, Minnesota, US
As a llama you have a great look, just most of the photos are letting you down For me this is your strongest image You need photos that are of higher quality Wish you well!
Model
Victoria Gevorkov
Posts: 98
Kansas City, Missouri, US
Thank you for your help guys. Im willing to delete anything I need so if you could give me any advice which is crap and which is not thatd be perfect.
Photographer
Orca Bay Images
Posts: 33877
Arcata, California, US
Lee_Photography wrote: For me this is your strongest image Are you kidding, Lee?!? That's her worst image. Looks like the result of a tragic kitchen accident.
Photographer
Orca Bay Images
Posts: 33877
Arcata, California, US
Victoria, Unfortunately, that new set is really weak. Washed-out. But if you feel you must keep one, I'd suggest: or By far, your strongest image (IMO) is: although the skin is overprocessed, the image is simply beautiful. Your expression and eye-contact are engaging to the point of knockout. Another strong one is: but I've got mixed feelings about the faux print damage (aging & scratches).I don't buy that the image is all scratched up except for the face. I'd probably prefer the simplicity of the original image without the fake marks, stains and scratches. And I'm even taken with: The sharpness of the hair, the intensity of the eyes, and the overall dynamic, all grab me. Please, please, PLEASE, get rid of: It's an unflattering mess.
Photographer
Lee_Photography
Posts: 9863
Minneapolis, Minnesota, US
Orca Bay Images wrote: Victoria, Unfortunately, that new set is really weak. Washed-out. But if you feel you must keep one, I'd suggest: or By far, your strongest image (IMO) is: although the skin is overprocessed, the image is simply beautiful. Your expression and eye-contact are engaging to the point of knockout. Another strong one is: but I've got mixed feelings about the faux print damage (aging & scratches).I don't buy that the image is all scratched up except for the face. I'd probably prefer the simplicity of the original image without the fake marks, stains and scratches. And I'm even taken with: The sharpness of the hair, the intensity of the eyes, and the overall dynamic, all grab me. Please, please, PLEASE, get rid of: It's an unflattering mess. Weaker of the two Messy hair Unusual background processing The blue whites of the eyes Stronger of the two I have to totally disagree with you on this
Photographer
Cherrystone
Posts: 37171
Columbus, Ohio, US
Of the new stuff......'eh, has a few problems. This could be the strongest one...key word, could. Needs some tweaking IMHO. This is a disaster....does you no favors at all.
Photographer
SKITA Studios
Posts: 1572
Boston, Massachusetts, US
Like this but wish it weren't slightly out of focus/soft: And ditto this could have been really strong if the lighting weren't terrible: This looks like a snapshot: And ditto lose this (makes you look fat):
Photographer
picturephotos
Posts: 521
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Lee_Photography wrote: For me this is your strongest image No.
Lee_Photography wrote: Stronger of the two Still no.
Victoria Gevorkov wrote: Thank you for your help guys. Im willing to delete anything I need so if you could give me any advice which is crap and which is not thatd be perfect. Delete the above image. Quickly.
Photographer
Christopher Carter
Posts: 7777
Indianapolis, Indiana, US
Lee_Photography wrote: Weaker of the two Messy hair Unusual background processing The blue whites of the eyes Stronger of the two I have to totally disagree with you on this Critique the OP. Not the responders choice of photos. Arguing with people in a critique thread because they disagree with you serves no real function.
Model
IDiivil
Posts: 4615
Los Angeles, California, US
This has got to go IMO, these should be removed also: ... the last one I get is a "real life" picture, but the seatbelt and car thing is not doing anything for you. Taking a clean shot in front of a white wall would do better.
Photographer
Adrienne Andersen
Posts: 69
Tampa, Florida, US
The new set's not that great. If you had to keep one, then the last one on the first row. I would actually consider of shooting you based on that pic. It's the only pic in your port , in my opinion, that actually gives a potential client or photog a good and flattering look at your face without the over-processing in the others. Good luck to you.
Photographer
Lee_Photography
Posts: 9863
Minneapolis, Minnesota, US
Mnemosyne Photography wrote: Critique the OP. Not the responders choice of photos. Arguing with people in a critique thread because they disagree with you serves no real function. Orca Bay Images wrote: Are you kidding, Lee?!? That's her worst image. Looks like the result of a tragic kitchen accident. Just responding to provide information to hopefully enlighten the critique of my response in the errors of their thinking If I can show them a new way of thinking about an image that is extreme and over the top, because some one was thinking out side the box its great. Or if they can convince me, then everyone is learning to think, or see in a different way from the view of some one else’s eyes. For me I probably agree with Orca Bay Images 90% of the time or more, so when there is a difference in viewing an image it is informative to try and figure out why the differing viewpoint. Is not that the purpose of a critique thread
Photographer
Christopher Carter
Posts: 7777
Indianapolis, Indiana, US
Lee_Photography wrote: Mnemosyne Photography wrote: Critique the OP. Not the responders choice of photos. Arguing with people in a critique thread because they disagree with you serves no real function. Just responding to provide information to hopefully enlighten the critique of my response in the errors of their thinking If I can show them a new way of thinking about an image that is extreme and over the top, because some one was thinking out side the box its great. Or if they can convince me, then everyone is learning to think, or see in a different way from the view of some one else’s eyes. For me I probably agree with Orca Bay Images 90% of the time or more, so when there is a difference in viewing an image it is informative to try and figure out why the differing viewpoint. Is not that the purpose of a critique thread No. The OP asked for opinions, not lessons on how to broaden their mind. Also, it's not out of the box thinking if you're the only one who thinks it. /hijack
Model
Victoria Gevorkov
Posts: 98
Kansas City, Missouri, US
Thank you ALL so much for taking the time out to respond with critiques ^_^ --Victoria Gevorkov
Photographer
Mark
Posts: 2977
New York, New York, US
can't help as they are all really bad
|