Forums >
Digital Art and Retouching >
"smart" fill a selection area based on edge pixels
In photoshop (or any other tool), is there a way to apply a "smart" gradient that fills in the area based on the edge pixels? Content-aware fill doesn't quite do it; and the patch tool preserves some of the original area's color for me. This would be really useful for removing image elements on frequency-separated layers. Jan 31 13 11:28 pm Link Can you describe more? Jan 31 13 11:45 pm Link The Space Cowboy wrote: ehh. kind of? I was trying to remove a large painting from behind a head. The wall was unevenly lit, in both intensity and (slightly) in color. The content-aware deletion was a joke, as always, and the patch tool gave me this: Feb 01 13 12:21 am Link I have done this many times. It does work best with walls that do not have wallpaper or defined patterns. I simply select the wall elements and fill with the wall color. Add a Clipped grey layer that has slightly blurred noise. You can create light fall-off with graduated shadows in Overlay or Softlight. k Feb 01 13 07:33 am Link Maybe this? http://www.3drender.com/light/EqTutorial/tiling.htm Can you get your wall texture from a high pass and build your own grad for the low frequencies and combine? Feb 01 13 10:03 am Link The Space Cowboy wrote: ideally that's what I'll do every time. I've also wanted this kind of thing for removing power lines against sky, larger blemishes against skin of graduated tonality, etc. anything that wants to be removed could benefit. Ken Fournelle wrote: the wall color here varies quite a bit. simply filling doesn't work at all. additionally, I'll want to use this elsewhere, where the colors vary by much more than they do here. I also have little luck with trying to carve in giant, subtle shadows with a tone layer. Feb 01 13 10:22 am Link I'll bet the color on the wall varies because you have color contamination coming from other light sources or bounce from colored objects. The wall does not have those color casts. I'm not sure why you are laboriously trying to preserve that or trying to come up with sophisticated solutions to a simple problem. Feb 01 13 11:12 am Link Ken Fournelle wrote: ohmygod. Mask Photo wrote: really, if you're not even going to read the posts so you can be constructive, why do you bother replying? Feb 01 13 01:23 pm Link |