Hmmm... I posted a reply and it incremented the 'reply' counter but the posting disappeared! Or it never got into the database properly. Oh well...
Basically, my objection to the image is that it stretches credibility a bit.
The lighting on the model was apparently strong (dark shadows under her chin), but the thunder clouds would create a diffuse light with no dark shadows, especially at night.
Also the moon shining though the thunder clouds is a bit hard to 'buy'.
If you are 'creating' an image from disparate parts, the lighting has to be at least in the same ball park on the various elements.
Just my opinion.