Forums > General Industry > Red flags to look for

Photographer

Fred Ackerman

Posts: 292

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US

Art of the nude wrote:

Demands, like "all images at the end of the shoot" or "I get to decide what is done with the images", unless they're planning on paying.

Nasty attitudes, including the likes of "I don't do nudes because I have morals."  Make your own choices for yourself, but when it comes to the choices others make, being judgmental doesn't look good.

Fear / threats.  "I always bring my boyfriend to shoots; it's a matter of safety."  If the model is afraid of me, how are we supposed to build a working relationship.

Lack of value for my role; "I won't work for FREE!!" or "NO FREE NUDES!!!".  Nude work is a big part of what I do, but whether or not it's in the plans for a specific shoot, I want to work with people who value my efforts.  An exchange of professional services is not "free."

Exactly! There are a few here who have biographies longer than War & Peace smile The funny thing is that many of the 'models' described in the quote aren't worth the effort, why bother with a potential problematic drama queen?

Feb 20 13 06:29 pm Link

Photographer

Eastfist

Posts: 3582

Green Bay, Wisconsin, US

This is how I research a model:

-Google for all possible aliases
-Look up Twitter, Tumblr, Facebook, YouTube, etc.
-Look up possible affiliations with other models, photogs, etc... (this part is important)
-Look up how recent images or activity is
-Cross-reference activity with affiliations to look for patterns in speech, text, etc.

If model turns out to be photographer, agent, third-party, then I skip. See, not too hard. Most important for me is to get direct contact with model, not only to know that I'm interacting with a human, but that the person in the photo is who they say they are.

Feb 20 13 06:32 pm Link

Photographer

Moore Photo Graphix

Posts: 5288

Washington, District of Columbia, US

vbabe wrote:
Good points. His profile pic looks like it's his photo for his OkCupid profile. Even has the OkCupid label on the image. He has some great ideas, but I really need more samples of his work to continue.

Just move on and find another photographer! It's clear you're not confident working with this individual. No need to continue this any further.

Feb 20 13 06:37 pm Link

Photographer

B R U N E S C I

Posts: 25319

Bath, England, United Kingdom

Crappy images alone are not a red flag - everybody has to start somewhere.

For me, any of the following in a model's bio would be a red flag:-

"** I HAVE MY STANDARDS! **"

"I love nude work, but..."

"my manager" or "my boyfriend" or "my husband" or "my kids"

"up to implied" or "implied only"

"through my agent"

"escort" or "chaperone"

"for my safety"

"RAW images"

"all images"

"my concepts"

"collaboration"


Of course, any one of the above might be entirely innocent, but when you see one red flag you start to look for others.




Just my $0.02

Ciao
Stefano

www.stefanobrunesci.com

Feb 20 13 07:23 pm Link

Photographer

Peach Jones

Posts: 6906

Champaign, Illinois, US

vbabe wrote:
What are the red flags you look for when browsing ports and people to work with? Lack of credits? Lack of shoots? What else?

1. When they haven't logged in fro 2-3 years
2. Even though they may not have had many shoots, they have an attitude like it is all about them or they won't even think of shooting with you

Feb 20 13 07:24 pm Link

Photographer

Art of the nude

Posts: 12067

Grand Rapids, Michigan, US

Eliza C wrote:
How about mis spelled words in forum posts?

Ha ha just kidding....I hate grammar fascists. But one of the best models on here with amazing credits does not speak English as her first language so there are a dozen mistakes. So that is nothing to go by.

Generally, you can tell ESL from "I don't think communication is important enough to use real words."

Feb 20 13 07:27 pm Link

Model

Paige Morgan

Posts: 4060

New York, New York, US

Tons of negative attitude, unreasonable demands or rants.


Takes forever to respond to communications, and basic details like the genre of what they want to shoot, a shoot date/time or shoot terms are extra difficult to pry out.

Refuses to give off site contact info.

Feb 20 13 07:42 pm Link

Photographer

Chicchowmein

Posts: 14585

Palm Beach, Florida, US

vbabe wrote:
Good points. His profile pic looks like it's his photo for his OkCupid profile. Even has the OkCupid label on the image. He has some great ideas, but I really need more samples of his work to continue.

Ideas are meaningless as images if one does not have the skill to execute them

Feb 20 13 07:44 pm Link

Photographer

Chicchowmein

Posts: 14585

Palm Beach, Florida, US

-B-R-U-N-E-S-C-I- wrote:
Crappy images alone are not a red flag - everybody has to start somewhere.

For me, any of the following in a model's bio would be a red flag:-

"** I HAVE MY STANDARDS! **"

"I love nude work, but..."

"my manager" or "my boyfriend" or "my husband" or "my kids"

"up to implied" or "implied only"

"through my agent"

"escort" or "chaperone"

"for my safety"

"RAW images"

"all images"

"my concepts"

"collaboration"


Of course, any one of the above might be entirely innocent, but when you see one red flag you start to look for others.




Just my $0.02

Ciao
Stefano

www.stefanobrunesci.com

Can you please use all of those phrases in a paragraph and share it with the class tongue

Feb 20 13 07:45 pm Link

Photographer

robert b mitchell

Posts: 2218

Surrey, British Columbia, Canada

Horrible portfolio pictures yet they put themselves down as "experienced". With what????? Also few or no credits, but a list of demands!!! tongue

Feb 20 13 07:57 pm Link

Photographer

Dragos Codita

Posts: 83

Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

Everybody has to start somehow.
Bad photos here is also questionable: maybe he/she is a beginer in model photography, did not have money or enough contacts to have a good enough model and so on.
Still it may be a good landscape, product, arhitectural or other parts of photography and wants to start here, why put a brake on it?

Feb 21 13 01:47 am Link

Photographer

Carl Blum Photography

Posts: 549

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

vbabe wrote:
What are the red flags you look for when browsing ports and people to work with? Lack of credits? Lack of shoots? What else?

What would you like the Red Flags to tell you?

If its Creeps, shy away from Photographers that 1.) Don't use a real name or give their real name. 2.) Don't credit models. 3.) Their Tag, well there is nothing personal about them. 4.) No Phone number   5.) no email address

When it comes to Type of photography, thats a crap shoot.... If you look at my port, you would never know that I spend most of my day shooting Product and Professional headshots of Lawyers and Doctors... and that I do weddings..

Feb 21 13 04:52 am Link

Photographer

Christine Eadie

Posts: 2614

Charleston, South Carolina, US

vbabe wrote:
What are the red flags you look for when browsing ports and people to work with? Lack of credits? Lack of shoots? What else?

Lack of shoots or credits do not bother me.

Red Flags:
Models who say they're "also photographers" and want to work with me to "see how I work."  Ha! Go take self portraits. Delete.
Models who write in their profiles "don't be a pervert - no nudes!" or words to that effect. Stupid. Delete.
Models who email off MM asking to shoot, but don't even send a photo or portfolio link. Stupid. Delete.
Models who approach me then say they will call to discuss setting up a shoot and promptly disappear. Unprofessional. 
If they shoot a bunch of really graphic, almost porn stuff, which makes me think they're somehow involved in the adult industry. I don't want my work used to promote someone in that industry. Delete.
Profiles written in text-style abbreviations. Ugh!
Models who go on and on about their kids and hubby - we will never shoot because you won't have a sitter or the kids will be sick, etc. delete.

Feb 21 13 01:40 pm Link

Model

Crystal Rose Modeling

Posts: 441

Sacramento, California, US

I'm just curious, but how come so many people are turned off by a port that says "I do not do nudes"? I think this prevents anyone from wasting their time with a model who clearly does not want to do nudes.

Feb 21 13 02:54 pm Link

Photographer

White Lace Studios

Posts: 1719

Mesa, Arizona, US

Eliza C wrote:
Here is my list of what i look for in red flags.

1. Miss spelled words on bio.

2. Cell self shot images on port.

3, More Ass Booty Tail images I car to look at.

4. Credits that indicate nothing worth reading about.

5. No expierance but wants top dollar for pay.

6. will not shoot nudes unless paid the allowed amount.

7.No TFP unless you pay them for gas make up artist and wardrope

8. Must have Escort friend grandma or bouncer at shoot.

9. Demands all RAW images on day of the shoot.

10. Will not shoot with Fat over weight photographers

just a few red flags i dont bother with.

How about mis spelled words in forum posts?

Bravo Magic Images wrote:
Ha ha just kidding....I hate grammar fascists. But one of the best models on here with amazing credits does not speak English as her first language so there are a dozen mistakes. So that is nothing to go by.

me too - but I can't pass up the irony (it made me grin) - "Miss spelled" is actually spelled misspelled

Feb 21 13 03:25 pm Link

Photographer

Patrick Walberg

Posts: 45198

San Juan Bautista, California, US

vbabe wrote:
I'm just curious, but how come so many people are turned off by a port that says "I do not do nudes"? I think this prevents anyone from wasting their time with a model who clearly does not want to do nudes.

It does prevent wasting time if a photographer is looking for models who shoot nudes.  I think there are more photographers on this site that shoot nudes than not, and those models that don't do nudes might be sensitive to that?  A model who has a derogatory message on her/his profile directed towards those models and photographers that do shoot nudes ... for an extreme example "I find nudity distasteful and refuse to do such dirty garbage!"  Don't contact me for nudes ... I don't do porn!"   No one I know has posted those exact words, but there are some models with a prejudicial attitude towards models who do nudes. 

When it comes to attitudes, I do not enjoy working with any people who are racist, overtly judgemental towards others, or pushy (bossy) about everything having to be their way.  I call those types "Diva's" and not in a good way.  It is a fact that I do shoot nudes, and I also shoot with a diverse number of models of all shapes, ages, and ethnicities.  Each person is different, so I respect the individuals right to choose what they wish to do.  Models do not have to do nudity!  It's the attitudes towards others that do I think these photographers are dealing with.  Just because you don't model nude doesn't mean I wont shoot with you!  (and you know that!)

Feb 21 13 03:33 pm Link

Photographer

Sentimental-SINtimental

Posts: 1314

Longview, Washington, US

Damn after reading this... I have many red flags.  big_smile
Guess I should be a signalman and start waving them instead of picking up my camera  sad


Anyone want to volunteer to correct my profile?  PM me   

not trying to steal thread

Feb 21 13 03:38 pm Link

Photographer

Photographe

Posts: 2351

Bristol, England, United Kingdom

Red flags start popping up when I don't see..

1. At least bare arms, bare legs, if not some proper body shot.

2. Full length shots.

3. Some evidence of having worked with a team of people.

4. A profile which is to the point and describes their goals. So many profiles are statements about fears and insecurities. Others make proud statements which are irrelevant to the task of selling themselves. Statements also about working conditions and terms, if it is not handled diplomatically, can make people look very amateur.

Red flags pop up when I see...

1. Repetition to the point where the portfolio is really just 2 days shooting. I would rather just see the two best shots from those days. In fact it is excruciating. But this shows me that the person has no mentoring or student mentality. (and also they might do the same with my pictures)

2. Obvious signs that the model has strong opinions of how she should look. Again I get the feeling they are someone who can't be told and will get melodramatic when faced with a professionally trained photographer rather than a GWC with money.

Feb 21 13 04:14 pm Link

Photographer

Kuttlefishfoto

Posts: 87

Vancouver, Washington, US

vbabe wrote:
I'm just curious, but how come so many people are turned off by a port that says "I do not do nudes"? I think this prevents anyone from wasting their time with a model who clearly does not want to do nudes.

Not me, but I can't speak on everyone's behalf.  Then again, I'm fat and overweight, probably explains why I don't get as many gigs as I would like to...

Feb 21 13 05:03 pm Link

Photographer

Christine Eadie

Posts: 2614

Charleston, South Carolina, US

vbabe wrote:
I'm just curious, but how come so many people are turned off by a port that says "I do not do nudes"? I think this prevents anyone from wasting their time with a model who clearly does not want to do nudes.

It's the WAY they say they don't do nudes. 
If they just say, "I don't shoot nudes," that's fine! No problemo!
But if they say, "Don't even ask me to do nudes because that's just nasty!" or "Perverts who shoot nudes better not send me a friend request, because I will block them!" that insinuates a photographer who shoots nudes is creepy or perverted.

All nudes are not the same. I'm a normal, non-perve art photographer and I get insulted when I see that kind of thing.

Feb 21 13 05:12 pm Link

Model

Teygan Ajani

Posts: 1

San Francisco, California, US

Also just curious - I'm much more of an observer than a participant in forums such as these; although since reading through a few of these threads I have noticed a few folks say that not having forum posts is a "red flag". Why are forum posts so important?

Feb 21 13 07:06 pm Link

Photographer

Marin Photo NYC

Posts: 7348

New York, New York, US

I don't think not having forum post is important at all. Look at their work and ask yourself, are they new? Are they at least trying to learn or get better? Are they executing anything well? Then have a conversation on the phone. Things come out and little clues reveal themselves as they speak. You then use your instincts and if you still feel uncomfortable then don't do it.

Feb 21 13 07:32 pm Link

Photographer

udor

Posts: 25255

New York, New York, US

vbabe wrote:
What are the red flags you look for when browsing ports and people to work with? Lack of credits? Lack of shoots? What else?

The lacking of lack makes me always very suspicious!

There is nothing worse in a portfolio if it doesn't contain non-lack.

It's just a really baaad sign!!! sad

Feb 21 13 07:33 pm Link

Photographer

Patrick Walberg

Posts: 45198

San Juan Bautista, California, US

Sentimental-SINtimental wrote:
Damn after reading this... I have many red flags.  big_smile
Guess I should be a signalman and start waving them instead of picking up my camera  sad


Anyone want to volunteer to correct my profile?  PM me   

not trying to steal thread

No, you are fine!  We are all looking for the green flag, and someone will get the checkered flag ... is that how it works?  Red flag means you stop on the course, yellow is caution and no passing.  Just don't get a black flag.  That means you get pulled from the course.  I used to work at race tracks.   lol

Feb 21 13 08:22 pm Link

Photographer

Patrick Walberg

Posts: 45198

San Juan Bautista, California, US

Teygan Ajani wrote:
Also just curious - I'm much more of an observer than a participant in forums such as these; although since reading through a few of these threads I have noticed a few folks say that not having forum posts is a "red flag". Why are forum posts so important?

I don't think it's so much about forum posts as what people say when "Tagging" a profile.  However since you posted here, I've noticed you.  Posting in the forums can be a good thing!  wink

Feb 21 13 08:24 pm Link

Photographer

Cherrystone

Posts: 37171

Columbus, Ohio, US

Teygan Ajani wrote:
Also just curious - I'm much more of an observer than a participant in forums such as these; although since reading through a few of these threads I have noticed a few folks say that not having forum posts is a "red flag". Why are forum posts so important?

There not.....but some forum folks are a little absorbed with the supposed importance of them.

Forum participation is probably in the 1-2% range, if that.

Feb 21 13 10:19 pm Link

Photographer

Bjorn Lumiere

Posts: 816

Asheville, North Carolina, US

Patrick Walberg wrote:

Stop right there!  ANY "demands!"  I don't like people who are demanding divas.  All those with demands can take it else where.  wink

Agreed.

Feb 21 13 10:24 pm Link

Photographer

Art of the nude

Posts: 12067

Grand Rapids, Michigan, US

vbabe wrote:
I'm just curious, but how come so many people are turned off by a port that says "I do not do nudes"? I think this prevents anyone from wasting their time with a model who clearly does not want to do nudes.

Well, I usually shoot nudes, so that's helpful, but I'm not offended.

What tends to offend people, often including models who DON'T do nudes, is things like "I don't do nudes, I HAVE SELF RESPECT!!!!"  (or Morals, or standards; or I don't want to hear from perverts, etc.)

Feb 22 13 03:42 am Link

Model

Retiredmodel

Posts: 7884

Monmouth, Wales, United Kingdom

Art of the nude wrote:
Well, I usually shoot nudes, so that's helpful, but I'm not offended.

What tends to offend people, often including models who DON'T do nudes, is things like "I don't do nudes, I HAVE SELF RESPECT!!!!"  (or Morals, or standards; or I don't want to hear from perverts, etc.)

I think the first part of your quote is understandable and I have attacked it when I see it. But the second part I think fair. You should see some of the pms and emails we get and what they ask us to do. I don't want  to hear from them. Half the time I think they get off on just sending the pms. So if you see a girl saying they don't want to hear from perverts it doesn't mean that they see shooting nude as immoral they just literally are fed up with the pervy pms. I don't get it so much now here but there is another site in the UK where the barrage was ridiculous. Shooting with artists like you is one thing but we also get requests from the 'reader's wives' mob. And when you try and politely turn that down you get the who do you think you are you snobby c***" attitude.

Feb 22 13 05:55 am Link

Photographer

Jackson frontier photos

Posts: 536

Joplin, Missouri, US

vbabe wrote:
I'm just curious, but how come so many people are turned off by a port that says "I do not do nudes"? I think this prevents anyone from wasting their time with a model who clearly does not want to do nudes.

I'd guess because they are wanting to shoot nudes but you're correct, clear specific boundaries without emotional delivery is the opposite of a red flag.  It's professional and profiles that read that way repel creeps, a lack of assertiveness attracts others behaving unprofessionally.  Not that it's an accuse for their behavior but its a contributing factor.  Conversely, professional assertive communication attracts professional/mature artists.

Feb 22 13 08:09 am Link

Photographer

Bobby C

Posts: 2696

Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand

Hipster models who are soooo into "alternative photographers."

Feb 22 13 08:23 am Link

Photographer

Ken Pegg

Posts: 1858

Weymouth, England, United Kingdom

Bravo Magic Images wrote:
Here is my list of what i look for in red flags.

1. Miss spelled words on bio.

...

Oh, the irony.

Feb 22 13 08:32 am Link

Photographer

Rp-photo

Posts: 42711

Houston, Texas, US

vbabe wrote:
What are the red flags you look for when browsing ports and people to work with? Lack of credits? Lack of shoots? What else?

I consider photographer portfolios that suggest a fixation on a particular gender, race, physique, or body part to be a "yellow flag". To me it suggests they might have some fetish or obsession that could lead to complications.

Feb 22 13 08:36 am Link

Photographer

JaneyGarnet

Posts: 85

Portland, Oregon, US

I think it's a law of the internet that any post criticizing spelling or grammar MUST contain at least one typo.

One thing I've seen is models getting excited to shoot with me because I'm a woman.  I can totally understand the appeal of chick photographers in that we probably won't perv on you.  But sometimes I run into a model who has problems shooting with men, and that gives me a hinky feeling.  If you can't deal with half the world's population, something's wrong and I don't want to touch it.

Feb 22 13 08:46 am Link

Model

Retiredmodel

Posts: 7884

Monmouth, Wales, United Kingdom

rp_photo wrote:

I consider photographer portfolios that suggest a fixation on a particular gender, race, physique, or body part to be a "yellow flag". To me it suggests they might have some fetish or obsession that could lead to complications.

Why are you a model? Why would you worry about working with a photographer?

Every male has a fixation on something. I can generally tell what it is. We wouldn't get any work if that wasn't the case. People like particular body types or boobs v bums or boots or stockings or blondes or redheads etc. That is natural. In fact it needn't even be sexual fetish.
If I was a photographer I'd have a port full of guys in leather with tattoos on vintage motrocycles but that is because I think it looks interesting I don't necessarily fancy them.  So I think also men can be the same. Visually interesting does not equate to sexual attraction. I know one guy who likes to shoot the ladies from Burma with neck coils  but he doesn't fancy them!

Feb 22 13 08:49 am Link

Artist/Painter

Two Pears Studio

Posts: 3632

Wilmington, Delaware, US

Read what they say.... and look for what they aren't saying.

I've only had a few weird experiences but nothing so strange the word no or walking away from it didn't cure.

Feb 22 13 09:02 am Link

Photographer

Flex Photography

Posts: 6471

Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Eliza C wrote:
Here is my list of what i look for in red flags.

1. Miss spelled words on bio.

2. Cell self shot images on port.

3, More Ass Booty Tail images I car to look at.

4. Credits that indicate nothing worth reading about.

5. No expierance but wants top dollar for pay.

6. will not shoot nudes unless paid the allowed amount.

7.No TFP unless you pay them for gas make up artist and wardrope

8. Must have Escort friend grandma or bouncer at shoot.

9. Demands all RAW images on day of the shoot.

10. Will not shoot with Fat over weight photographers

just a few red flags i dont bother with.

Ken Pegg wrote:
Oh, the irony.

Apparently lots of irony! big_smile

Feb 22 13 03:01 pm Link

Photographer

Art of the nude

Posts: 12067

Grand Rapids, Michigan, US

rp_photo wrote:
I consider photographer portfolios that suggest a fixation on a particular gender, race, physique, or body part to be a "yellow flag". To me it suggests they might have some fetish or obsession that could lead to complications.

I shoot females because I find them more attractive.  I mostly shoot Caucasians because that's who expresses an interest in my work, although it's no where near 100%.  I shoot models who I find aesthetically pleasing, or interesting, because it's MY art.  smile  And, when the model is comfortable with it, I shoot ALL body parts, from eyes to labia, although I very, very, seldom focus on feet.  I leave that to the experts.

Feb 22 13 06:58 pm Link

Photographer

Fotografica Gregor

Posts: 4126

Alexandria, Virginia, US

Looking for the "red flags" - ie, the negative - is the wrong focus IMO

instead look for the qualities you want in a collaborator -

for me, as a photographer, that means

appearance, measurements,

vibe

credits

sense of professionalism

a port with some fresh images

if those things are there it will work out just fine 95 times out of 100

Feb 22 13 07:06 pm Link

Model

Crystal Rose Modeling

Posts: 441

Sacramento, California, US

Patrick Walberg wrote:
It does prevent wasting time if a photographer is looking for models who shoot nudes.  I think there are more photographers on this site that shoot nudes than not, and those models that don't do nudes might be sensitive to that?  A model who has a derogatory message on her/his profile directed towards those models and photographers that do shoot nudes ... for an extreme example "I find nudity distasteful and refuse to do such dirty garbage!"  Don't contact me for nudes ... I don't do porn!"   No one I know has posted those exact words, but there are some models with a prejudicial attitude towards models who do nudes. 

When it comes to attitudes, I do not enjoy working with any people who are racist, overtly judgemental towards others, or pushy (bossy) about everything having to be their way.  I call those types "Diva's" and not in a good way.  It is a fact that I do shoot nudes, and I also shoot with a diverse number of models of all shapes, ages, and ethnicities.  Each person is different, so I respect the individuals right to choose what they wish to do.  Models do not have to do nudity!  It's the attitudes towards others that do I think these photographers are dealing with.  Just because you don't model nude doesn't mean I wont shoot with you!  (and you know that!)

That is a good point and makes sense. I always try and make sure my posts and comments in my profile do not include any judgement on nudes. I simply say I do not do nude. No need to imply that you think nudes are porn or skanky or etc. I have seen some of those profiles that say "I don't do skanky nudes" and can definitely understand the offense. I personally think there are a lot of models on here that do amazing nudes! I have personal reasons for not doing nudes, but I definitely support models doing nudes because it's really a work of art. I definitely don't understand people viewing it as porn, as I'm sure it the photographer and the model don't view it that way. A lot of my family members are super conservative and like to say even women in bikini's are "slutty"...never understood it. No one was born with clothes on! smile

Feb 22 13 10:13 pm Link