Model
J O A N N E
Posts: 2362
Derby, England, United Kingdom
dd photography wrote: not up to par with your other lovely work This one https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/32695073 18+ Her forehead has been cut off Great portfolio though!! On another note, I'm going to get skipped cause the person below me also commented on the same photographer
Model
J O A N N E
Posts: 2362
Derby, England, United Kingdom
Sarah Beggs wrote: Haha, I noticed.. I'd pick this just because it's not on par with the rest of your port.. Good expression though https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/19325656 Maybe you'll get to go twice? hehe thankyou!! Sarah Beggs is next just to keep the flow going smoothly!
Model
Nicolette
Posts: 12718
Houston, Texas, US
Just Danielle wrote: hehe thankyou!! Sarah Beggs is next just to keep the flow going smoothly! I know the feeling. I got skipped too >.<
Ssarah Beggs wrote:
I read that your a new model, and I think you're off to a great start. But this feels super amateur, like you're posing for a friend or something. It's not as good as the rest of what you've got.
Model
E L I N
Posts: 199
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Nicolette wrote: I read that your a new model, and I think you're off to a great start. But this feels super amateur, like you're posing for a friend or something. It's not as good as the rest of what you've got. https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/0 … c116d3.jpg 18+ Too much hair all over the face, eyes are looking to the sides so all we see is white. You pose very well but this one doesn't do it for me.
Photographer
John Draper
Posts: 87
Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
Photographer
Gamma Photography
Posts: 232
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
dd photography wrote: not up to par with your other lovely work This wasn't easy - there are no losers in your port. I note that her left foot is (motion?) blurred in this shot: Cheers! Gary
Photographer
Jorge Kreimer
Posts: 3716
San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico
Gamma Photography wrote: This wasn't easy - there are no losers in your port. I note that her left foot is (motion?) blurred in this shot: Gary
Model
Shirin Brigitte
Posts: 379
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
You made it very hard for me! But this one:
Photographer
Gamma Photography
Posts: 232
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
It looks like the sun is in your eyes and you're squinting. Based on other photos in which your eyes are clearly visible, that's a shame in this shot Cheers! Gary
Photographer
dd photography
Posts: 944
San Diego, California, US
Gamma Photography wrote: It looks like the sun is in your eyes and you're squinting. Based on other photos in which your eyes are clearly visible, that's a shame in this shot Cheers! Gary I appreciate the variety of your portfolio, you take chances and that's good. I'd recommend you ditch this image> It's very cliche, flat and not very interesting. I first time photoshop user may find this exciting, or a "model" who has never "modeled" may see this as clever but c'mon, most MM users or any savvy viewer will look at it as trite. Kill. You have better!
Photographer
HO Photo
Posts: 575
Los Angeles, California, US
dd photography wrote:
This one. Pose is a little awkward, definitely the hardest for the eye to instinctively connect with and understand. Lots of really beautiful stuff in your port, nice work.
Model
E L I N
Posts: 199
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
I'll say this one. In m opinion, the quality just doesn't seem up to the rest of your port for me.
Photographer
Gamma Photography
Posts: 232
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
I chose this one due to the framing/cropping, which I find a little unsettling - totally a personal thing. 18+ Love the legs in your port G
Model
Meghan Congdon
Posts: 706
Austin, Texas, US
Gamma Photography wrote: I chose this one due to the framing/cropping, which I find a little unsettling - totally a personal thing. 18+ Love the legs in your port G Yep, that's a nice eye. But I don't like the crop, and the lighting is unflattering. You can see every little wrinkle and stray hair, and that's not the point of the photo, so it takes away from it. The rest of your portfolio is far superior.
Model
2960427
Posts: 148
s-Gravenhage, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
It's too much like you're average sex puss picture. It's seen and done a million times, and better than this as well. Doesn't show anything unique about you.
Model
E L I N
Posts: 199
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Lovely port! I have to go with this one. Like the creative makeup idea but the strand of hair over your lips is awfully distracting.
Photographer
EdwardKristopher
Posts: 3409
Tempe, Arizona, US
E L I N wrote: Lovely port! I have to go with this one. Like the creative makeup idea but the strand of hair over your lips is awfully distracting. Elin, Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and beholding you is beautiful! The only one I have to point out is due to the fact of my own personal issues and not yours. I don't like smoking pictures so: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/33655802 It's still a great shot, yet not my taste! Kindest regards, Edward
Photographer
closed up shop
Posts: 3176
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
Elin, Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and beholding you is beautiful! The only one I have to point out is due to the fact of my own personal issues and not yours. I don't like smoking pictures so: https://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/33655802 It's still a great shot, yet not my taste! Kindest regards, Edward This one, though I think as a whole there needs to be a mass culling of the herd to show a sleeker more balanced portfolio. With so many shots it's easy to have shots that are not your best make it into the fold.
Model
Nicki Micki
Posts: 270
Charleston, South Carolina, US
Photographer
Open Eyes
Posts: 109
Seattle, Washington, US
https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/1 … 481bf3.jpg This one. Overall I like your shots but the composition does not work for me. Count the number of shots in your port where you cropped off the top of the models head. This can work when it serves a purpose like drawing the focus to a tight shot of the eyes but it can also distract as it did for me in this one. I do like the other aspects of your style though. Great light in your shots.
Model
Nicolette
Posts: 12718
Houston, Texas, US
Beth Chambers wrote:
Photographer
dd photography
Posts: 944
San Diego, California, US
you are a toughie, many many good photos, but I had to pick and I picked this one: I'd like to see the same depth as your other work for your head shot. This one is too stare(y) and straight-on. Very nice portfolio!
Model
Faune Addams
Posts: 42
Vancouver, Washington, US
Oh, boy. You shoot the kind of photos that I want in my portfolio. This is hard. I would say #40. I'm not fond of the lipstick or the light bulb reflected off the glasses.
Photographer
Gamma Photography
Posts: 232
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
I have to choose this one due to the distracting background (18+) G
Photographer
Jorge Kreimer
Posts: 3716
San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico
Gamma Photography wrote: I have to choose this one due to the distracting background (18+) G
Photographer
WDI
Posts: 187
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Never a 3D fan and this image has that effect. I like the composition and other aspects, though.
Photographer
dd photography
Posts: 944
San Diego, California, US
i did your best and now ... the not so best:
Photographer
WDI
Posts: 187
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
dd photography wrote: i did your best and now ... the not so best: Fair enough! Thanks. ;-) The next person needs to skip me. ^^
Photographer
PhotographE
Posts: 72
Liverpool, England, United Kingdom
@dd photography : tbh i couldnt find a bad image in your profile and I liked them all , nice work & well done mate !
Photographer
dd photography
Posts: 944
San Diego, California, US
so true, finally someone gets it kidding ... this one: thanks cuz
Photographer
PhotographE
Posts: 72
Liverpool, England, United Kingdom
dd photography wrote: so true, finally someone gets it kidding ... this one: thanks cuz this is not from my port ?! Lol
Model
Meow Kitty
Posts: 14
Petaluma, California, US
Photographer
Black Rainbow Inc
Posts: 21
Kansas City, Kansas, US
All but the first three are pretty bad. I'd delete all of those.
|