Forums > Off-Topic Discussion > New top level domain names

Photographer

RINALDI

Posts: 2870

Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands

What are your thoughts on these new domains, e.g: name.photography, name.gallery, etc?

Do you see this becoming popular, or having the same fate as 3rd level domains like: name.123.com, or name.photo.com?

Discuss big_smile

Aug 28 14 03:31 am Link

Photographer

Max Santini

Posts: 18

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Dont waste your time.
.com is the daddy.
For prestige alone, it has to be .com
Everything else is second rate.
I founded a business that specialises in developement of internet technologies since 2004 so I have some expertise and experience.

Please note that there are very technical reasons why you must stick to .com
I wont get into this so I will keep this simple.
Tim Berners Smith created the internet and domain names.
At the start he only made .com.
I asked about this years ago when I met him at a law & government event in the UK
He said other names were introduced because of demand.
In simple terms, by design the internet defaults to .com first then looks down the list so to speak.
After .com comes .net then .info
Everything else afterwards.

Image and prestige is everything on the web.

Aug 28 14 03:55 am Link

Photographer

RINALDI

Posts: 2870

Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands

So you don't think it can be a valuable part of branding? What about .co, seems to be hugely popular?

I tend to be pleasantly surprised, seeing a non-.com, I guess .com is in such a global and frequent use, that it doesn't move me anymore.

Aug 28 14 04:06 am Link

Photographer

Roy Hubbard

Posts: 3199

East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, US

Max Santini wrote:
Dont waste your time.
.com is the daddy.
For prestige alone, it has to be .com
Everything else is second rate.
I founded a business that specialises in developement of internet technologies since 2004 so I have some expertise and experience.

Please note that there are very technical reasons why you must stick to .com
I wont get into this so I will keep this simple.
Tim Berners Smith created the internet and domain names.
At the start he only made .com.
I asked about this years ago when I met him at a law & government event in the UK
He said other names were introduced because of demand.
In simple terms, by design the internet defaults to .com first then looks down the list so to speak.
After .com comes .net then .info
Everything else afterwards.

Image and prestige is everything on the web.

Tim Berners Lee created the World Wide Web, not the Internet.

For my part, I've had serious misgivings about using the new TLDs, for several reasons. I am setting up a redirect from royhubbard.photography to my site at royhubbard.com, and I'm going to start development soon on a photography-based social network on a .photography domain. It's a cool side-project, and I don't really have anything staked in it so we'll see what happens.

Aug 28 14 06:19 am Link

Photographer

T Brown

Posts: 2460

Traverse City, Michigan, US

.com, .org, .gov, and .net (edited)

Back when I was a young'n that's all we had and we were damn glad to have em too.

Aug 28 14 06:53 am Link

Photographer

RINALDI

Posts: 2870

Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands

Roy Hubbard wrote:

Tim Berners Lee created the World Wide Web, not the Internet.

For my part, I've had serious misgivings about using the new TLDs, for several reasons. I am setting up a redirect from royhubbard.photography to my site at royhubbard.com, and I'm going to start development soon on a photography-based social network on a .photography domain. It's a cool side-project, and I don't really have anything staked in it so we'll see what happens.

Hmm, never thought of using those new tld's for projects and platforms, good luck! big_smile

Aug 28 14 07:03 am Link

Photographer

RINALDI

Posts: 2870

Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands

T Brown wrote:
.com, .org, .gov

Back when I was a young'n that's all we had and we were damn glad to have em too.

Haha awww come on, age is only important for birthdays and senior discounts wink

Aug 28 14 07:05 am Link

Photographer

udor

Posts: 25255

New York, New York, US

Max Santini wrote:
Dont waste your time.
.com is the daddy.
For prestige alone, it has to be .com
Everything else is second rate.

When I registered my art domain, .com was already taken years ago by a children's book company.

So, I was only able to get .net and also .org

I am still very happy that I got .net!

www.surrealities.net

Aug 28 14 07:08 am Link

Photographer

BeautybyGod

Posts: 3078

Los Angeles, California, US

i think most are kinda stupid, but i can see a possible big advantage for google searches.

if it were .photo instead of .photography i might go for a couple.

seems like a money grab.

Aug 28 14 07:11 am Link

Photographer

RINALDI

Posts: 2870

Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands

BeautybyGod wrote:
i think most are kinda stupid, but i can see a possible big advantage for google searches.

if it were .photo instead of .photography i might go for a couple.

seems like a money grab.

You can get .photo wink

Aug 28 14 07:16 am Link

Photographer

Fotticelli

Posts: 12252

Rockville, Maryland, US

gregorygarecki.photography

Not quite ready to make it the primary domain for my website, that's why it switches to .com once you hit it. I think it looks cool as fuck on a business card.

I'm going to wait a year for people to get used to the idea that there are top domains other than .com and .net and then make .photography my primary domain.

Aug 28 14 07:30 am Link

Photographer

BeautybyGod

Posts: 3078

Los Angeles, California, US

RINALDI wrote:

You can get .photo wink

on godaddy it says 'coming soon'. and it seems some TLDs are a bit pricey.



while searching i noticed renewal for my dhall.ws has gone to $20... from $8 last time i renewed it. not happening.

Aug 28 14 08:20 am Link

Photographer

Sleepy Weasel

Posts: 4839

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

You're 6 months late to the party, brah! https://www.modelmayhem.com/po.php?thread_id=916612

wink

Some of the ones I used I thought were fun and look cool in my email sig or on a biz card.

Aug 28 14 08:53 am Link

Photographer

Sleepy Weasel

Posts: 4839

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

T Brown wrote:
.com, .org, .gov, and .net (edited)

Back when I was a young'n that's all we had and we were damn glad to have em too.

You probably hate(d) the idea of 10-digit dialing, too. Why do I need an area code?! tongue

Aug 28 14 08:58 am Link

Artist/Painter

ethasleftthebuilding

Posts: 16685

Key West, Florida, US

T Brown wrote:
.com, .org, .gov, and .net (edited)

Back when I was a young'n that's all we had and we were damn glad to have em too.

...and we walked five miles to school with those four top level domains, uphill both ways, it was always over 100 degrees and in three feet of snow...with no shoes!  But we had our .com, .org, .net and .gov...and we were happy back then, those were the good ole days!

Aug 28 14 09:59 am Link

Artist/Painter

ethasleftthebuilding

Posts: 16685

Key West, Florida, US

Roy Hubbard wrote:
Tim Berners Lee created the World Wide Web, not the Internet.

Al Gore invented the Internet!

...although his top level domain .prez never did seem to catch on.  lol

Aug 28 14 10:01 am Link

Photographer

Bobby C

Posts: 2696

Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/b7/Verisign-dottv-logo.jpg

.tv seems to be hot right now.

Aug 28 14 10:13 am Link

Photographer

Brian Diaz

Posts: 65617

Danbury, Connecticut, US

I've seen very few worthwhile sites that use anything other than .com, .org, etc. as their primary domain.  Some use other domains (usually country TLDs) to shorten it (e.g. instagr.am) but they still have a primary .com address.

I think the biggest problem will be people recognizing that a non-standard URL is actually a URL.  I mean, if you saw briandiaz.photography on a bus ad driving by, would you think you could go to that address?  If you saw briandiazphotography.com, you certainly would, but I think it will be a while before any of the expanded TLDs really catch on, and then, only a few will be well recognized.

Aug 28 14 10:47 am Link

Photographer

RINALDI

Posts: 2870

Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands

Brian Diaz wrote:
I've seen very few worthwhile sites that use anything other than .com, .org, etc. as their primary domain.  Some use other domains (usually country TLDs) to shorten it (e.g. instagr.am) but they still have a primary .com address.

I think the biggest problem will be people recognizing that a non-standard URL is actually a URL.  I mean, if you saw briandiaz.photography on a bus ad driving by, would you think you could go to that address?  If you saw briandiazphotography.com, you certainly would, but I think it will be a while before any of the expanded TLDs really catch on, and then, only a few will be well recognized.

Good point! I also think many assume the dot is part of the design, whether on a business card or like you mentioned, in advertising.

Aug 28 14 10:58 am Link

Photographer

Brian Diaz

Posts: 65617

Danbury, Connecticut, US

It's also easier for automatic recognition of primary domains.  Look at my post above.  One URL is automatically linked.  The other...well, it will take a lot of individual websites to update in order to get every new TLD to be turned into clickable links.

Aug 28 14 11:24 am Link