Forums > Off-Topic Discussion > New top level domains available for web sites!

Photographer

Sleepy Weasel

Posts: 4839

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

So the good ones are available as of today: .camera, .gallery, .photography, .graphics, .lighting, .equipment.

I was able to snag a couple: sleepyweasel.photography and had some fun with a subdomain to get sleepy.weasel.photography.

From the host I used, they were $16.88/yr to purchase (and just forward to my existing site, so no additional cost).

Anyone else plan on indulging?

Feb 12 14 09:24 am Link

Photographer

Roy Hubbard

Posts: 3199

East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, US

I will, for sure. I'm not getting any results from my registrar's search, though they have the new domains listed as being available today.

Edit: whoops, found it

Edit again: all the best stuff is already taken sad

Hm, the domains I want are listed as taken everywhere, but available at GoDaddy for extortionate prices. Fuck GoDaddy, this is exactly why I left them.

Feb 12 14 09:35 am Link

Photographer

The Dave

Posts: 8848

Ann Arbor, Michigan, US

I grabbed mine at Namecheap for 16 bucks.  GoDaddy wanted 24 for the same thing.

www.daveproctor.photography

Feb 12 14 11:37 am Link

Artist/Painter

ethasleftthebuilding

Posts: 16685

Key West, Florida, US

Thanks for the heads up, I had forgotten those were coming out today...I just grabbed the one I wanted.

Feb 12 14 11:49 am Link

Photographer

Roy Hubbard

Posts: 3199

East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, US

To clarify, the domains that are listed as taken on Namecheap and 1and1 are on sale at GoDaddy for $399.

Feb 12 14 12:54 pm Link

Photographer

Sleepy Weasel

Posts: 4839

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

I used Namecheap as well for mine.

I figured some models might snag .gallery, or the digital retouchers might take .graphics?  Or .camera for photographers?

I think .photo might be on the way soon, but it seems redundant to .photography.

Feb 12 14 01:31 pm Link

Photographer

The Dave

Posts: 8848

Ann Arbor, Michigan, US

Roy Hubbard wrote:
To clarify, the domains that are listed as taken on Namecheap and 1and1 are on sale at GoDaddy for $399.

GoDaddy is known to lock up names then sell them at higher than normal pricing since it costs them nothing.

Feb 12 14 02:21 pm Link

Photographer

Roy Hubbard

Posts: 3199

East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, US

-The Dave- wrote:

GoDaddy is known to lock up names then sell them at higher than normal pricing since it costs them nothing.

Yep, aware of this. I have to admit I wasn't expecting it for the .photography domains, but it's right in line with their normal way of doing things.

Feb 12 14 02:55 pm Link

Photographer

Sleepy Weasel

Posts: 4839

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

No one else has jumped on one of these new domains?

Feb 13 14 03:31 pm Link

Photographer

Lightcraft Studio

Posts: 13682

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

-The Dave- wrote:

GoDaddy is known to lock up names then sell them at higher than normal pricing since it costs them nothing.

Network Solutions does that too, plus they automatically lock (for a few months) any name you check through their site.

Feb 13 14 04:58 pm Link

Photographer

OwenImages

Posts: 3844

Pinellas Park, Florida, US

Soooo much more typing.  No way!  Also, not something people are familiar with or will be able to remember as easily.  Not only does it make the web address long to type but the email addresses too.  .COM is the way to go!

All of that said, I do understand the need for additional TLDs and am glad there is versatility out there for some.  I know when .cc and .ws etc etc were all getting marketed years and years ago, some people snatched those up but still, they never really caught on and just lead to confusion.  If at all possible, stick with .COM, add a hyphen to your business name if you have to...

I went with OwenImages.com (using my last name) to allow for versatility as it is hard to guess the precise path your art will take you in the years or decades to come.  I could do photography of course, photo editing, digital creations, video is a stretch but I could go there with it...any type of imagery.  I think it worked for the best in my case.

My 2 cents.

Feb 13 14 10:49 pm Link

Photographer

Sleepy Weasel

Posts: 4839

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

I obviously still have my dot-com, but my new web address is actually shorter:

sleepyweaselphotography.com

vs.

sleepy.weasel.photography

But I disagree it's not memorable. Many might be able to get shorter domain names now if their desired dot-com was previously taken.

Feb 14 14 06:38 am Link