Forums > Photography Talk > Experts: Here's one, has me scratching my head!

Photographer

Good Egg Productions

Posts: 16713

Orlando, Florida, US

I've been seeing some interesting focusing issues on my D800 lately and decided to do some actual tests.  It does seem that I've got a little bit of a back focusing issue and the Lens AF fine adjust doesn't seem to do much to fix the issue. 

However, in an effort to make sure I was focusing on what I was focusing on, I took back to back shots with the viewfinder and then with LiveView when I saw something really interesting.

I saw a pretty significant cyan/magenta shift from one to the other.  Below is a 100% crop of what I'm seeing.

https://www.goodeggproductions.com/sideside.jpg
both shot at 50mm 1.8 @ f/2.8, 1/200 sec, ISO800, processed from RAW at 4850K with +9 magenta tint (just what Adobe Camera Raw defaulted to)

My question is what the heck would be causing this??  Tiny heat changes in the sensor because of 20 seconds of Live View?

My OTHER question is if I send it into Nikon, will they be able to fix/adjust out my back focusing issue.  As an estimate for how much it's off, I set up a tape measure and shot with a 50mm at about 2 feet, focusing on the 12" line, and the super crisp focus was at about 12 and 3/8".  More testing at about 10 feet misses focus by about 3-4".

Today, I bought a D810 and .... wow.  So I know it's not the lenses. 

I'm really looking to know if anyone has sent a camera into Nikon repair and had their back focusing, or any focusing, issue resolved and how much it cost.

Help please, if you can.

Oct 21 14 06:02 pm Link

Photographer

udor

Posts: 25255

New York, New York, US

Good Egg Productions wrote:
I'm really looking to know if anyone has sent a camera into Nikon repair and had their back focusing, or any focusing, issue resolved and how much it cost.

Help please, if you can.

I can't help with the color shift, but I have backfocusing issues on my D7000.

There is a focusing sheet you can print out so that you can recalibrate the camera/lens combo yourself.

I am guessing that you can do this kind of adjustment on your D800 as well. However, you need to do the adjustment for each of your lenses and the camera stores that info and adjust automatically when your switch lenses. At least, that's for D7000 and I don't know if that's the same with your camera.

https://regex.info/i/JEF_024811_sm.jpg

I did a quick Google Search and found this:

http://blog.mingthein.com/2012/06/29/go … using-fix/

Oct 21 14 06:34 pm Link

Photographer

Thomas Van Dyke

Posts: 3233

Washington, District of Columbia, US

Good Egg Productions wrote:
I saw a pretty significant cyan/magenta shift from one to the other.

Caveat... not a D800 expert, that said... believe what you are seeing here is CA induced by slightly out of focus high contrast edges...  Would recommend placing the camera on a focusing rail... lock the lens to manual, same with camera... use the electric rangefinder function to get close to precise focus... now move the rig ever so slightly in the smallest increments... watch to see if it appears and disappears as the contrast edge goes into and out of focus...

I had this issue with a D7000 and discovered it would fringe high contrast borders that were just slightly out of focus... showed up as strong hot pink CA ridge parallel to the high contrast edge... once the focus was spot on they disappear... white lettering on black produced the worst CA... no high contrast boundaries, no problem...  Yes it was pretty much lens independent, albeit some where worse than others... btw, this issue was absolutely worse wide open... the CA would virtually disappear when the lens was stopped down to 5.6 or greater...

Hope Nikon fixes the AF issue... know how frustrating it can be...

Good luck with this...

Oct 21 14 06:50 pm Link

Photographer

Good Egg Productions

Posts: 16713

Orlando, Florida, US

Yeah... I know about the AF fine tune.  I tried playing around with the settings but nothing seemed to make things better or all that much worse.

I'll try using the focus sheet you provided and see if that sheds any light.  Thanks for the links.

This all seemed to start being a problem after I used the camera this summer for a film (video) project where the camera was often outside, sometimes in the sun for stretches, and things got pretty hot. 

My fear is that the outside temps in the sun pushed things outside of their operating temperatures and maybe something expanded that shouldn't have expanded.  All I know is that the camera operated largely flawlessly until that month of outdoor work.

Oct 21 14 06:56 pm Link

Photographer

Thomas Van Dyke

Posts: 3233

Washington, District of Columbia, US

Good Egg Productions wrote:
...the camera operated largely flawlessly until that month of outdoor work.

Maybe it might be best for Nikon to bring it back into spec... just a thought...  good luck with this and please share your experience with Nikon services...

Oct 21 14 07:04 pm Link

Photographer

Good Egg Productions

Posts: 16713

Orlando, Florida, US

Thomas Van Dyke wrote:

Maybe it might be best for Nikon to bring it back into spec... just a thought...  good luck with this and please share your experience with Nikon services...

I've actually had two previous experiences with them and a D2x.

One was pretty terrible.
One was very good.

I'll need to do some more specific testing so that I can tell them exactly what I'm seeing and not seeing.  I think this D800 has really ruined my expectations for what an image is supposed to look like.  Nikon jerks... making their cameras TOO good!  hmm

Oct 21 14 07:09 pm Link

Photographer

Zack Zoll

Posts: 6895

Glens Falls, New York, US

Thomas Van Dyke wrote:

Caveat... not a D800 expert, that said... believe what you are seeing here is CA induced by slightly out of focus high contrast edges...  Would recommend placing the camera on a focusing rail... lock the lens to manual, same with camera... use the electric rangefinder function to get close to precise focus... now move the rig ever so slightly in the smallest increments... watch to see if it appears and disappears as the contrast edge goes into and out of focus...

I had this issue with a D7000 and discovered it would fringe high contrast borders that were just slightly out of focus... showed up as strong hot pink CA ridge parallel to the high contrast edge... once the focus was spot on they disappear... white lettering on black produced the worst CA... no high contrast boundaries, no problem...  Yes it was pretty much lens independent, albeit some where worse than others... btw, this issue was absolutely worse wide open... the CA would virtually disappear when the lens was stopped down to 5.6 or greater...

Hope Nikon fixes the AF issue... know how frustrating it can be...

Good luck with this...

This is exactly what's going on. Green/magenta CA is by far the most common kind of CA ... And I forget the order, but one generally happens in front of the point of focus, and the other behind it. They only line up exactly along the focus plane.

For a really extreme example, check out Nikon's 105 f/1.8 AiS. It has the worst CA of any 'quality' lens I've ever used - and as a rule, the AiS lenses are all really good.

What you're seeing is CA, and the colour shift is due to miniscule changes in your focal plane. It seems like that lens just doesn't want to be wide open on that camera - at least not for colour images.

Oct 21 14 08:34 pm Link

Photographer

Good Egg Productions

Posts: 16713

Orlando, Florida, US

For the record, it wasn't wide open. It was a 1.8 lens at 2.8, but I understand the CA issue with focal planes.

I just didn't understand why the focusing would be different through the viewfinder and using Live View. It was actually more accurate using Live View, but I cant shoot that way. Way too slow.

Oct 22 14 12:40 am Link

Photographer

HV images

Posts: 634

Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom

What you are seeing is longitudinal chromatic aberration or LOCA.

Don't be afraid to be aggressive with the AF fine adjusting, sometimes it doesn't seem to take effect until you are above 15-18 points.

Oct 22 14 02:53 am Link

Photographer

Thomas Van Dyke

Posts: 3233

Washington, District of Columbia, US

Good Egg Productions wrote:
...I just didn't understand why the focusing would be different through the viewfinder and using Live View...

Again not a D800 user, that said I believe your camera is using Contrast Detection to acquire a focus lock in Live View (it's somewhat slower than Phase Detection owing to its algorithms) as apposed to Phase Detection which is utilized when acquiring focus lock via the viewfinder... 

Both focusing methodologies are unique and each has it's own virtues and limitations...

Manual focus in Live View is what several of my colleagues use for critical micro work... And they are commercial shooters...

Hope this helps..

Oct 22 14 06:38 am Link

Clothing Designer

GRMACK

Posts: 5436

Bakersfield, California, US

Nikon does seem to have an affinity to backfocus for some reason maybe only their engineers know.

Bad part is that the AF can alter in the distance range as well.  That I pretty much discovered with the Sigma 35mm ART and the Sigma AF tuning puck.  You can tune that 35mm prime at four different distance ranges.  Mine worked out to some bizarre -13 at close, -7 and -5 (two mid ranges), and -2 at infinity.  Very enlightening.  Bad part is the body only has one setting (Nikon got cheap there where Olympus and Canon allow for two on zooms.), and it is totally different on another body too.

Looking at Nikon's service manuals show some Nikon lenses can be adjusted for 6 points over distance.  Nikon calls it "Lens Defocusing."  Whether or not the Nikon tech will do all 6 zones is doubtful.  Maybe two is "Good 'nuff" for them.

Put a zoom in the mix and it really is a big deal to adjust.  Sigma has all sorts of tuning stuff for one of those in its tuning software: Zoom range and Distance both.  Must take a day to do one.  Good luck getting a warranty tech to fix that!

Might help to send in both the body and lens and let them try and address both.

Good luck!

Oct 22 14 06:52 am Link

Photographer

Lallure Photographic

Posts: 2086

Taylors, South Carolina, US

Have you checked your ground glass setting?

Oct 22 14 07:33 am Link

Photographer

J Haggerty

Posts: 1315

Augusta, Georgia, US

HV images wrote:
What you are seeing is longitudinal chromatic aberration or LOCA.

Don't be afraid to be aggressive with the AF fine adjusting, sometimes it doesn't seem to take effect until you are above 15-18 points.

Nailed it. It's a curse afflicting most of the digital imagery world and there are several forums on the topic and I'm sure there's one out there for OP's camera. Photoshop's RAW dialog box has a tool to help alleviate the disturbance (another vital point in the positive for shooting RAW). Go to the RAW dialog and hit the tab "Lens Correction". Use the Chromatic Aberration sliders to compensation. You can also select the Defringe drop-menu and check "All Edges".

Oct 22 14 09:53 am Link

Photographer

Good Egg Productions

Posts: 16713

Orlando, Florida, US

Thomas Van Dyke wrote:

Again not a D800 user, that said I believe your camera is using Contrast Detection to acquire a focus lock in Live View (it's somewhat slower than Phase Detection owing to its algorithms) as apposed to Phase Detection which is utilized when acquiring focus lock via the viewfinder... 

Both focusing methodologies are unique and each has it's own virtues and limitations...

Manual focus in Live View is what several of my colleagues use for critical micro work... And they are commercial shooters...

Hope this helps..

Thank you for this.

I did notice that it took far longer for the camera to focus in Live View, and it makes sense that it has to do it differently since the mirror is up.  I suppose this is another vote for mirrorless DSLRs. 

Personally, I'll do manual focusing in Live View, but only for video.  If I had all day to shoot a jewelry campaign, I'm sure I'd do the same. But my subjects are generally moving and I don't have all day to shoot them.

I want to thank everyone who participated here.  I honestly didn't expect more than a few responses with the forum participation lately and with such a boring subject.

Oct 22 14 10:03 am Link

Photographer

Good Egg Productions

Posts: 16713

Orlando, Florida, US

Jennifer Haggerty wrote:

Nailed it. It's a curse afflicting most of the digital imagery world and there are several forums on the topic and I'm sure there's one out there for OP's camera. Photoshop's RAW dialog box has a tool to help alleviate the disturbance (another vital point in the positive for shooting RAW). Go to the RAW dialog and hit the tab "Lens Correction". Use the Chromatic Aberration sliders to compensation. You can also select the Defringe drop-menu and check "All Edges".

I've used the CA adjustment in the RAW conversion. I have a Rokinon 85 t/1.5 lens that's absolutely gorgeous, but the CA is pretty atrocious.  Well, compared to a 105mm f/2.8 macro that I often use, anyway.  It does a pretty amazing job of minimizing the effect and turns a spray of back lit water from a magenta mess into a very light pink/white rain, like it's supposed to look like.

Oct 22 14 10:07 am Link

Photographer

J Haggerty

Posts: 1315

Augusta, Georgia, US

Good Egg Productions wrote:

I've used the CA adjustment in the RAW conversion. I have a Rokinon 85 t/1.5 lens that's absolutely gorgeous, but the CA is pretty atrocious.  Well, compared to a 105mm f/2.8 macro that I often use, anyway.  It does a pretty amazing job of minimizing the effect and turns a spray of back lit water from a magenta mess into a very light pink/white rain, like it's supposed to look like.

Hm. I haven't used a Rokinon so I can't review my experience. I have a Sigma 50mm f/1.4 and it's alright, the CA is only really noticeable on metal such as necklaces and earrings. My Canon 85mm f/1.8 and the CA shows more magenta around certain skin situations.

Oct 22 14 10:11 am Link

Photographer

Good Egg Productions

Posts: 16713

Orlando, Florida, US

Jennifer Haggerty wrote:
Hm. I haven't used a Rokinon so I can't review my experience. I have a Sigma 50mm f/1.4 and it's alright, the CA is only really noticeable on metal such as necklaces and earrings. My Canon 85mm f/1.8 and the CA shows more magenta around certain skin situations.

The Rokinon lenses I have are cine lenses with non-clicking apertures and geared focus and aperture rings for follow focus rigs.  There's no motors or autofocus electronics in them.  Just some clear glass.  I use the 85 for outdoor portraits and the bokeh is creamy and delicious.

I just chose to buy a set of three lenses for video production, and still spent way less than a single 85mm f/1.4 Nikon lens would have cost.  big_smile

ah... and here's an example of that Rokinon lens.
https://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/140921/20/541f9c7f1d0e8_m.jpg

Even in the scaled down image for MM, you can see a strong cyan edge to the hightlight blobs in the background.  I did not use the CA adjustment in the RAW conversion for this image.  Still, good enough to get published.  meh.

Oct 22 14 10:51 am Link

Photographer

J Haggerty

Posts: 1315

Augusta, Georgia, US

It's not grossly obvious but I see what you're talking about. It's a lovely capture!

Oct 22 14 10:57 am Link