|
|
(14)
|
| Info
|
| Last activity: |
May 22, 2013 |
 |
| Joined: |
Jan 01, 2011 |
|
George Richard Wilkes
Male
Oceanside, California, US
|
Mayhem #1994115
Photographer
|
MM URL: http://www.modelmayhem.com/GRWPics
About me
This is brief information -- please see below the dashed line if you want more detail! :)
I’m looking to have shoots that bring out your best features – “glamour shots,” roughly speaking -- including, if possible, your inner love and light.
I presently want to incorporate four things – in fact, they can be done in order, as follows:
1. Start with sexiness (this can be attitude and pose);
2. Then add love (which is inner);
3. Then add friendliness (toward the viewers of the photos);
4. Then add an attitude of welcoming (which, as with love and friendliness, is inner, of course).
Do these things, and I think we can really get something!
Ultimately, though, I think it can largely be boiled down to this: The ideal thing is for you to look such that most viewers would want to know you!
(More thoughts below, including -- toward the bottom of the page -- regarding concepts of mine regarding friend requests.)
----
Photographing women in glamour mode is one thing that interests me. As for glamour shots, topless and/or early Playboy-type nude shots (i.e., no crotch views, which is as elegantly as I can describe it -- :D) is as revealing as I want to do right now.
Following are some ideas of mine about beauty:
SOME IDEALS/POSITIVE EXAMPLES AS TO LOOKS:
Piercings: The fewer holes in your body, the better.
Tattoos: I used to think it would probably be okay for me to just shoot around tattoos, or that makeup could cover them. It gives me inner peace to agree to shoot only tattoo-free models (unless you pay me), and leave it at that.
Hair: Long – yes, yes, yes! Check out Playboy, or any muscle magazine that appeals mainly to men, and you’ll see mostly or always LONG HAIR. Yes, puh-leeze! :D
Hair, continued: No “roots” showing, okay (including if you’re lying on your back with your hair flowing back from your forehead). Why anyone needs to dye their hair other than its natural color, I don’t know – yes, I prefer natural and real. Frankly, I don’t think it’s necessary to bleach one’s hair – how well did Cindy Crawford do with dark hair, for example? – but, if is to be done, it is better to not have it be obvious. It’s kind of like that dark saying about sincerity that goes like this (or approximately): “Once you can fake that, you you’ve got it made.” (Ouch, right?)
Speaking of natural and real . . . : Natural breasts are best. Fake ones tend to look – er, fake. :D Also, philosophically, I don’t like the idea of being aroused by a couple of bags of plastic. “Love-lee!” :D
Example of a great midriff (except for stud in navel and the resulting holes): http://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/pic/22407047. Note that she has some muscular definition showing – it’s not just a flat surface (covered with fat). Yes, I know that this is uncommonly good, and that the lighting emphasizes this – but at least there’s something there for the lighting to show.
(More thoughts are below – are we having fun yet?)
-----
Hello!
I started taking pictures in childhood. More recently (though I’m mainly showing only pictures here with people in them), I’ve taken pictures of animals (including at least one insect), of clouds, of mountains, of buildings, of flowers – anything that I may find beautiful or otherwise interesting.
As regards this site, I am interested in photographing women, especially for (but not necessarily limited to) glamour shots.
I believe that a lot of what makes a good picture is how the person being photographed feels during the shoot. If the model is enjoying the shoot, I think that tends to show, making for more pleasing pictures.
Somewhat along the same lines, a woman who took some pictures of me years ago said something on a website, I recall, about displaying the inner person. I think perhaps by relating to that inner person, on some level, a photographer may then draw it out, getting more than just the surface level.
I think that relating to the inner person helps bring the pictures to life – maybe because, as the director D. W. Griffith said, what we look for in an actor is the light within. He said it was that. I think that this inner light can help make a photographic subject interesting, over and above the actual physical appearance. (Frankly, I think that although the inner light is important, people relate to the outer, too!)
As for the inner light, perhaps I can help bring that out (or at least welcome it!) – and a lot of that, I believe, has to do with the mood of the person being photographed.
----
Regarding Friend Requests: When I do a friend request, it means that I consider that we are already friends on some spiritual level, and/or that I want us to be friends. It’s very simple, therefore, and literal: If I make a friend request, I want us to be friends. (It may or may not imply an interest in our working together – but, let’s be frank: If we’re living in different states, or different countries, it’s usually not probable that we WILL work together, however impressed by you I may be – but it's still possible for us to be FRIENDS.)
Friends
Model
Felicia Satto
|
Model
Samantha lynn Chase
|
Model
Jessie Shannon
|
Model
Dancing4u
|
Model
Cat Mandu
|
Model
Liz Ashley
|
Model
StaceyDixon
|
Model
AdriannaMarie
|
Model
Anomaly De Void
|
Model
Laura LeAnne
|
Model
Ashley Sidener
|
Model
_Nathalie_
|
George Richard Wilkes has 78 friends.
|
| 
| 
| edu