Hugh  Jorgen wrote:
Im interested!!

"Waves Hello"

LMAO...you can be such an ass Hugh. I just love it.

aphrodisiac wrote:
Why don't we have a right click enabled site so that won't happen????  Good Idea...yes, no?

For several reasons...One, you can simple drag a pic from internet explorer into photoshop and bingo...Second, you can look at the cache for internet explorer and click on it and it will bring up the pic...That also holds true for OMP....

Basically, as has been stated a million times before...If someone wants a pic of you, they are going to get it...

Ty Simone wrote:
The site is no longer there

Wow - that was fast - eight hours ago the full site was still up...

aphrodisiac wrote:
Why don't we have a right click enabled site so that won't happen????  Good Idea...yes, no?

Sorry but right click enabled site will only stop people from right clicking to save.

It will not protect from making a screenshot of the picture or from finding out where the file is on your server.

Kharizma wrote:
even with a right click thingy, you can take images still off of sites. LOL. I tried it at omp and bingo I got some images off....lol..It is so easy. Very easy if you have access to a computer lol.. Nothing is safe on the web..nothing at all.

For the most part you are absolutely right. However, there is a method to prevent images from being taken, EVEN with Screen shots. The problem is the cost for such a system is high, and I do not think Tyler wants to spend that kind of money

Soon, I may have a cheaper version available that does not use proprietary technology (meaning you do not have to pay licensing fees to some big companies)

If it works, I will give it to Tyler for free.

Until then, Watermarks and hidden text are best

Kharizma wrote:
even with a right click thingy, you can take images still off of sites. LOL. I tried it at omp and bingo I got some images off....lol..It is so easy. Very easy if you have access to a computer lol.. Nothing is safe on the web..nothing at all.

*cough* So you blantently say in front of all these people that you steal photos off of "OMP"?

Well thats cool as long as its that site and not this one. Best of luck with that.

EMG STUDIOS wrote:
I'm curious to know what the charges will be? *Impersonating an Internet Model* I don't mean that as a dig at you, but what more could be done, if she was hired and showed up to a set and she wasn't the girl in the pictures, then what?

If she had your personal information and was opening bank and credit cards in your name that's a different story. Maybe I'm too far to the left on this one.

It falls in the copyright and trademark infrigement area, and inpersonating someone. Federal crime i believe.

Peter Dattolo wrote:
*cough* So you blantently say in front of all these people that you steal photos off of "OMP"?

Well thats cool as long as its that site and not this one. Best of luck with that.

I do it, too. I "steal" pictures of me from photographers' pages and maliciously store them on my hard drive. Run me in.

theda wrote:
I do it, too. I "steal" pictures of me from photographers' pages and maliciously store them on my hard drive. Run me in.

They are your photos, thats not stealing. But for the sake of running behind you, lets say you stole them anyways.   


EDIT: Actualy i give my models that option if they want a photo for thier website and it saves them time, i tell them to take it off my page.

theda wrote:

I do it, too. I "steal" pictures of me from photographers' pages and maliciously store them on my hard drive. Run me in.

Theda i think you took that too seriously, it was not meant to be serious. Maybe this will help:

*Bright light shining right in your eyes* So you blantently say in front of all these people that you steal photos off of ***?   *Turns light back onto the photo on the wall and plops down in the chair eating peanuts*......Well thats cool as long as its that site.

Does that sound better? Was not meant to be a serious reply to her comment.

MHana wrote:
There have been many arguements on the subject and if you do a search on related words you will find many or if Brian Diaz is around then he can give you some links.

It gets easier when I can just find the list I posted last time...

https://modelmayhem.com/posts.php?thread_id=2072

https://modelmayhem.com/posts.php?thread_id=3184

https://modelmayhem.com/posts.php?thread_id=2141

https://modelmayhem.com/posts.php?thread_id=10969

Dyanov wrote:
I have done a most thorough investigation and the oly thief I can find, is the time stealer who started this post and provides not a pixel of evidence for her megabyte claims.

The only purpose of this thread is to misdirect viewers into going to a bogus link so that they can read some ads.

If there is no evidence that the thread starter wants to present here, then this thread should be closed .

So cynical! If time is so valuable to you, I'd suggest getting off the forums.

Apparently you have not done THE most thorough investigation. There was a modeling site there, though no recent indexing of its content. Folks, go to the Wayback Machine. It's an archive of indexed pages from websites over the years.  Keep in mind that not all links will bring you to pages that are archived, some images may no longer exist and some take a long time to load.  Here are two links to indexed pages with images, one to images themselves and another to the Wayback machine link for that site.  Click on various links to find pages still archived.

http://web.archive.org/web/200303262312 … yjean.com/
http://web.archive.org/web/200211241939 … yjean.com/
(two of the indexed pages for her site)

http://web.archive.org/web/200107220355 … yjean.com/
(Looks like there may be a couple of flaky fakies on this page)

http://web.archive.org/web/200110311144 … igroup.jpg
(LOL!!! Definitely some fakes here!!!)

http://web.archive.org/web/*/www.tammyjean.com
(Main Wayback machine link for this site)

Who's your daddy?

Ty Simone wrote:

For the most part you are absolutely right. However, there is a method to prevent images from being taken, EVEN with Screen shots. The problem is the cost for such a system is high, and I do not think Tyler wants to spend that kind of money

Soon, I may have a cheaper version available that does not use proprietary technology (meaning you do not have to pay licensing fees to some big companies)

If it works, I will give it to Tyler for free.

Until then, Watermarks and hidden text are best

There is no way currently expensive or not to stop anyone from getting an image that can be displayed on their monitor period. There are only ways to make it more difficult.

Peter Dattolo wrote:
It falls in the copyright and trademark infrigement area, and inpersonating someone. Federal crime i believe.

When you find a laywer that takes this case forward me their info, I have a couple of mailmen I want to sue for stuffing my mail in the box and wrinkling my coupons.

Dyanov wrote:
I have done a most thorough investigation and the oly thief I can find, is the time stealer who started this post and provides not a pixel of evidence for her megabyte claims.

The only purpose of this thread is to misdirect viewers into going to a bogus link so that they can read some ads.

If there is no evidence that the thread starter wants to present here, then this thread should be closed .

I don't know if you checked the link right after she posted this thread.  I did go to the link and saw a lot of pictures of other models that I've seen in MM.  Some girl was claiming they were her own....

May