Miss Nicole wrote:
gross. period. there is no reason for that, I don't care what anyone says to the contrary. gross.

that says it right.

digital Artform wrote:
erect nipples in bras, too! I'm against them!

I mean I WANT to be against them.

Okay, what I mean is-

never mind.

lol that was funny

Doubting Thomas wrote:
I find these incredibly distasteful, much more vulgar than a simple ithyphallic shot.  My question is...how often are these required for fitness/underwear models? So many guys on this site have erect shots in their ports, and I simply do not want to be photographed like that.

Always the pretty boys who won't do that! XD

I kid, I kid!!

Dean Solo wrote:
Erect penises should be outlawed period!! They are a menace to society and anyone caught with "erection" should be put behind bars.

Who's bars? You mean mine?

Doubting Thomas wrote:
I don't have anything against an erect penis, I just don't want to have my picture taken in that abject state.  The point of this thread is to ask if it's often obligitory for fitness/underwear models to...*ahem*..."beef up".

Thomas - nothing is obligatory. :-D

Doubting Thomas wrote:
I don't have anything against an erect penis, I just don't want to have my picture taken in that abject state.  The point of this thread is to ask if it's often obligitory for fitness/underwear models to...*ahem*..."beef up".

Lol if I were your photographer, would that still hold true?

Dean Solo wrote:
Erect penises should be outlawed period!! They are a menace to society and anyone caught with "erection" should be put behind bars.

Now this, is F@#kin funny.

Dean Solo wrote:
Erect penises should be outlawed period!! They are a menace to society and anyone caught with an "erection" should be put behind bars.

OH NO! That makes kitty sad.

Emily Fine wrote:

Who's bars? You mean mine?

Yeah, that attitude is why your on my top six.

Hamza wrote:
Erect penis through underwear, camel toe, what's the difference?

Um...arousal?

Payaso_Perverso wrote:
You people are funny who cares... If it is not something you want to do that is fine don't do it... It is just funny to see you guys afraid of Cock... That is so funny...

I'm gonna go with ewww...

And Payaso_Perverso.... Your avatar is 18+ You can't use it as an avatar.

Emily Fine wrote:

Lol if I were your photographer, would that still hold true?

Never had my picture taken by a hottie...and you know what, I doubt I ever will

Doubting Thomas wrote:

Never had my picture taken by a hottie...and you know what, I doubt I ever will

Don't doubt... dreams do come true

Doubting Thomas wrote:

Hamza wrote:
Erect penis through underwear, camel toe, what's the difference?

Um...arousal?

Come on, are you telling me your penis only gets erect when you are aroused?  Are you telling me it doesn't get erect sometimes just because?

An erect penis does not always come from 'Arousal'... 

Biology is a wonderful subject to study when you're in school.

Colegrove Photography wrote:
So how about we do a series, and call it perky pud vs flacid phallus?
Cool huh.

HAHAHA, can I be in that series?

Hamza wrote:
Come on, are you telling me your penis only gets erect when you are aroused?  Are you telling me it doesn't get erect sometimes just because?

An erect penis does not always come from 'Arousal'... 

Biology is a wonderful subject to study when you're in school.

Biology was indeed an awesome thing to study.

Colford Studios wrote:

Thomas - nothing is obligatory. :-D

Well speak of the devil.

Doubting Thomas wrote:

Well speak of the devil.

That's me! 

PS - check your email.

Doubting Thomas wrote:
I find these incredibly distasteful, much more vulgar than a simple ithyphallic shot.  My question is...how often are these required for fitness/underwear models? So many guys on this site have erect shots in their ports, and I simply do not want to be photographed like that.

Erection shots should be saved for construction photos.