Photographer
Dean Solo
Posts: 1064
Miami, Arizona, US
Richard Dubois wrote:
The chicken seems to have an erection. You're not helping. The Leprachaun seems to have one coming out of his arse!
Model
Chelsea Lauren
Posts: 1461
Gresham, Oregon, US
Richard Dubois wrote: The chicken seems to have an erection. You're not helping. Ok, I will go back to my corner then.
Photographer
Dean Solo
Posts: 1064
Miami, Arizona, US
Richard Dubois wrote:
The chicken seems to have an erection. You're not helping. The Leprachaun seems to be having one coming out of his arse!
Photographer
Bananaboat
Posts: 675
Rossi Photography wrote:
I'm not. I was referring to you. lol guess i'm just naughty
Model
Adrienne Aurora
Posts: 2745
Atlanta, Georgia, US
I was hoping for more links in this thread. ***sarcasm***
Model
Chelsea Lauren
Posts: 1461
Gresham, Oregon, US
Dean Solo wrote: The Leprachaun seems to be having one coming out of his arse! Well, sheesh if we want to go into phallic objects, he has a penis nose, cane, arse, and ear. See if I ever try to be funny again! Good'ay. haha.
Photographer
Dean Solo
Posts: 1064
Miami, Arizona, US
Jonathan R Miller wrote: lol guess i'm just naughty Guy's take out your hostility with your penises., en guard let the penis sword fight begin!
Photographer
Dean Solo
Posts: 1064
Miami, Arizona, US
Chelsea Lauren wrote: Well, sheesh if we want to go into phallic objects, he has a penis nose, cane, arse, and ear. See if I ever try to be funny again! Good'ay. haha. Sorry love no offense, just mucking around. Realy didn"t mean to spoil your fun.
Model
Chelsea Lauren
Posts: 1461
Gresham, Oregon, US
Dean Solo wrote: Guy's take out your hostility with your penises., en guard let the sword fight begin! Ooooh hoo hoo hoo! *grabs crappy point and click* And go.....!*thinks to self of all the money I can make on ebay seeling the pictures*
Photographer
Bananaboat
Posts: 675
and its pretty obvious he just started this post because he is a macho straight man with a complex and the only reason he wont have a shot like that in his profile is because he thinks a bunch of gay men would look at it and touch their own erect penis which he needs to realize he isn't even good looking anyways just because he has a nice body... I think he just has something against homos and he only thnks homos have these shots on here... but we all know every 18 and up image of a woman he is zooming in on even if it is artful.... he probably thinks lesbians are sexy and gay guys are gross as well... real men are comfortable in their sexuality... whether gay straight bi or whatever
Model
Chelsea Lauren
Posts: 1461
Gresham, Oregon, US
Dean Solo wrote: Sorry love no offense, just mucking around. Realy didn"t mean to spoil your fun. You didn't. I am about 5 posts away from posting a link to a song on here. It would work so perfectly for this thread.
Photographer
picturephoto
Posts: 8687
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Dean Solo wrote:
Sorry love no offense, just mucking around. Realy didn"t mean to spoil your fun. Ya, we're just keeping it light right along with you.
Photographer
Dean Solo
Posts: 1064
Miami, Arizona, US
Chelsea Lauren wrote: Ooooh hoo hoo hoo! *grabs crappy point and click* And go.....!*thinks to self of all the money I can make on ebay seeling the pictures* Yes, you know it's a fact that Leonardo studied the cracks and fizzures of old walls trying to decipher the hidden icons. Just the other day, I myself saw a penis in a cheese toast.
Model
Chelsea Lauren
Posts: 1461
Gresham, Oregon, US
Dean Solo wrote: Yes, you know it's a fact that Leonardo studied the cracks and fizzures of old walls trying to decipher the hidden icons. Just the other day, I myself saw a penis in a cheese toast. Did you eat it? HAHAHAHA!
Photographer
GDS Photos
Posts: 3399
London, England, United Kingdom
Dean Solo wrote: Yes, you know it's a fact that Leonardo studied the cracks and fizzures of old walls trying to decipher the hidden icons. Just the other day, I myself saw a penis in a cheese toast. That'll teach you not to sass the maitre d' at the diner.
Chelsea Lauren wrote: Did you eat it? HAHAHAHA! You didn't call him "sir".
Photographer
far away
Posts: 4326
Jackson, Alabama, US
Jonathan R Miller wrote: and its pretty obvious he just started this post because he is a macho straight man with a complex and the only reason he wont have a shot like that in his profile is because he thinks a bunch of gay men would look at it and touch their own erect penis which he needs to realize he isn't even good looking anyways just because he has a nice body... I think he just has something against homos and he only thnks homos have these shots on here... but we all know every 18 and up image of a woman he is zooming in on even if it is artful.... he probably thinks lesbians are sexy and gay guys are gross as well... real men are comfortable in their sexuality... whether gay straight bi or whatever Where do you come up with this stuff? From what you said up there, says more to me about you, than it does him. The impression I get from what you said is that you're an insecure gay man full of anger. Just sayin'. *shrugs* How old are you, anyway? If you don't mind. Just curious. EDIT: Forget it. I checked myself. 19 years old and gay. Just as I guessed you to be.
Photographer
Dean Solo
Posts: 1064
Miami, Arizona, US
Chelsea Lauren wrote: Did you eat it? HAHAHAHA! Na, it was too lovely, I put it on me wall.
Model
Chelsea Lauren
Posts: 1461
Gresham, Oregon, US
gdsandy wrote: You didn't call him "sir". I do believe him and I are past that point. haha. And where would sir have fit in that?!
Photographer
GDS Photos
Posts: 3399
London, England, United Kingdom
Rossi Photography wrote: Just curious. Oooohh Rossi, I just took that remark out of context and am now in danger od incurring the diospleasure of the OP for my own physical state LOL
Photographer
GDS Photos
Posts: 3399
London, England, United Kingdom
Chelsea Lauren wrote:
I do believe him and I are past that point. haha. And where would sir have fit in that?!
I just adore that old world charm and enjoy your use of it is all.
Photographer
Jay Edwards
Posts: 18616
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US
I'm confused. Aren't you in control of your own erection? If so, then it shouldn't be a problem.
Model
Chelsea Lauren
Posts: 1461
Gresham, Oregon, US
gdsandy wrote: I just adore that old world charm and enjoy your use of it is all. Thank you. My grandparents raised me. They taught me to respect my elders and to address people older than I as Miss or Sir. Unless of course I don't think you are a very kind person worthy of being a sir or miss. Because, then, you are just plain rude and deserve no title.
Photographer
William Kious
Posts: 8842
Delphos, Ohio, US
The law often makes a distinction. In many jurisdictions depicting the penis in a "turgid state" - covered by underwear or not - is considered pornographic.
Photographer
Dean Solo
Posts: 1064
Miami, Arizona, US
Chelsea Lauren wrote: Thank you. My grandparents raised me. They taught me to respect my elders and to address people older than I as Miss or Sir. Unless of course I don't think you are a very kind person worthy of being a sir or miss. Because, then, you are just plain rude and deserve no title. Yes, I am of age to be called sir, but I don't like it one bit! ,but thank you madam for the respect.
Model
Chelsea Lauren
Posts: 1461
Gresham, Oregon, US
Dean Solo wrote: Yes, I am of age to be called sir, but I don't like it one bit! I called Barry Druxman sir, and he about killed me. I had to explain to him it was my upbringing because it pissed him off so bad. I was just trying to pay the man a compliment too! edit: Barry is a very nice man, by the way. He is very youthful. I love Barry.
Photographer
Dean Solo
Posts: 1064
Miami, Arizona, US
Chelsea Lauren wrote:
I called Barry Druxman sir, and he about killed me. I had to explain to him it was my upbringing because it pissed him off so bad. I was just trying to pay the man a compliment too! It is a sort of proper formality and there is nothing wrong wih it, but I will dread the day my models start refering to me as sir.
Photographer
Jay Edwards
Posts: 18616
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US
Dean Solo wrote:
It is a sort of proper formality and there is nothing wrong wih it, but I will dread the day my models start refering to me as sir. Hmm, I like it when my models refer to me as Sir.
Photographer
GDS Photos
Posts: 3399
London, England, United Kingdom
Chelsea Lauren wrote: I called Barry Druxman sir, and he about killed me. I had to explain to him it was my upbringing because it pissed him off so bad. I was just trying to pay the man a compliment too! I learned German many years ago at an old English public school. I was taught the phrase "Gnadiges Fraulein" it was a polite term of endearance for a young woman. Since moving to Switzerland, the German speaking part, I have been, after many withering looks, told that it is inappropriate to refer to young women as "virgins". Time has changed the meaning but I didn't realise LOL
Photographer
Dean Solo
Posts: 1064
Miami, Arizona, US
Chelsea Lauren wrote: [ Barry is a very nice man, by the way. He is very youthful. I love Barry. Don't know whom you are making referance to, but o.k.. I idolize Richard Avedon because he was a handsome devil to the end and seemed to retain that playfulness and curosity about life that great photographers have. Again, that could be said of Helmut Newton as well. Most real photographers seem to age gracefully.
Model
Lillith Leda
Posts: 663
Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
Chelsea Lauren wrote:
Silly boy, viagara doesn't work on women! Actually, I have heard something to the contrary! ;-) By the way, you're funny!!
Photographer
Jay Edwards
Posts: 18616
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US
Dean Solo wrote: Most real photographers seem to age gracefully. Huh? What does that mean?
Photographer
GDS Photos
Posts: 3399
London, England, United Kingdom
Dean Solo wrote: Most real photographers seem to age gracefully. I'd almost like to age disgracefully.
Model
Lillith Leda
Posts: 663
Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
Dean Solo wrote:
Don't know whom you are making referance to, but o.k.. I idolize Richard Avedon because he was a handsome devil to the end and seemed to retain that playfulness and curosity about life that great photographers have. Again, that could be said of Helmut Newton as well. Most real photographers seem to age gracefully. And the fake ones go a bit spastic? Avedon.. le sigh.
Photographer
GDS Photos
Posts: 3399
London, England, United Kingdom
Lillith Leda wrote:
Actually, I have heard something to the contrary! ;-) By the way, you're funny!! I heard that it made them more "sensitive". That may just be an urban myth though.
Model
Chelsea Lauren
Posts: 1461
Gresham, Oregon, US
Lillith Leda wrote: Actually, I have heard something to the contrary! ;-) By the way, you're funny!! They make a female equvilant, but do women really "dry out"? I know erection for men get difficult after a certain point in their lives, but I don't recall hearing anything about women drying out. It may quite possibly be that I am completely in the dark in the subject. I have plenty of mojo, so pills for me may give me the equivilant of having a, what is it, 8 hour erection for a man. hahahah.
Model
Thomas NYC
Posts: 224
Manhattan, Illinois, US
Jonathan R Miller wrote: and its pretty obvious he just started this post because he is a macho straight man with a complex and the only reason he wont have a shot like that in his profile is because he thinks a bunch of gay men would look at it and touch their own erect penis which he needs to realize he isn't even good looking anyways just because he has a nice body... I think he just has something against homos and he only thnks homos have these shots on here... but we all know every 18 and up image of a woman he is zooming in on even if it is artful.... he probably thinks lesbians are sexy and gay guys are gross as well... real men are comfortable in their sexuality... whether gay straight bi or whatever Uh...no. I don't care if gay guys are aroused by my image, even if it's just for my pecs and not my supposedly hideous horse face. This has nothing to do with "homos". Now, I'm not going to dignify this further. I would appreciate if you did not address me or refer to me in any more posts.
Model
Chelsea Lauren
Posts: 1461
Gresham, Oregon, US
gdsandy wrote: I heard that it made them more "sensitive". That may just be an urban myth though. If you want it more sensitive on a woman, use Whoopie Cream. It's the most awesome thing in the world. My friend and I went into a "store" and they let us go in the bathroom and sample it and we both came out of the bathrooms all tingly and wanting to run home to our men. hahaha.
Photographer
Dean Solo
Posts: 1064
Miami, Arizona, US
Lillith Leda wrote: And the fake ones go a bit spastic? Avedon.. le sigh. Funny, I have this book somewhere that makes the premise along the lines that photographers because they are constantly looking (drinking) in the world and it's images, this natural curosity and exploration keeps them youthfull. Hokey perhaps, but a lot of old photographers look better for their age then old doctors. *Edit* "thei rage" Freudian Slip no doubt.
Photographer
GDS Photos
Posts: 3399
London, England, United Kingdom
Chelsea Lauren wrote: They make a female equvilant, but do women really "dry out"? I know erection for men get difficult after a certain point in their lives, but I don't recall hearing anything about women drying out. It may quite possibly be that I am completely in the dark in the subject. I have plenty of mojo, so pills for me may give me the equivilant of having a, what is it, 8 hour erection for a man. hahahah. Viagara as a friend, a doctor told us over dinner while on a skiing trip (that should be enough that you don't think it was a consultation; I have my pride), allows blood to flow more easily through the veins which allows tumescence (a lovely word) to occur. It wouldn't I think make a women moist (another loveley word but one my wife hates) bit would allow more blood to reach the sensitive bits of her lady bits.
|