Doubting Thomas wrote:

Uh...no.  I don't care if gay guys are aroused by my image, even if it's just for my pecs and not my supposedly hideous horse face.  This has nothing to do with "homos".

Now, I'm not going to dignify this further.  I would appreciate if you did not address me or refer to me in any more posts.

Then don't send me stupid PM's and maybe i will... and i never said anything about horse and your face together.... but um if thats what you think about yourself i cant change that

Dean Solo wrote:

Funny, I have this book somewhere that makes the premise along the lines that photographers because they are constantly looking (drinking) in the world and it's images, this natural curosity and exploration keeps them youthfull. Hokey perhaps, but a lot of old photographers look better for their age then old doctors.

*Edit* "thei rage" Freudian Slip no doubt.

Enough of this waxing poeticaly, let's get back to penis talk.

gdsandy wrote:
Viagara as a friend, a doctor told us over dinner while on a skiing trip (that should be enough that you don't think it was a consultation; I have my pride), allows blood to flow more easily through the veins which allows tumescence (a lovely word) to occur.  It wouldn't I think make a women moist (another loveley word but one my wife hates) bit would allow more blood to reach the sensitive bits of her lady bits.

Ah, ok, got it.  I'm only 19, so I am guessing I won't have to worry about these issues for quite some time.  And now that I have jinxed myself......

Dean Solo wrote:
Enough of this waxing poeticaly, let's get back to penis talk.

Wow, they talk now?! I just thought they spit all over the place a lot.
hahaha. Ok, now seriously though, I'll shut up.

Chelsea Lauren wrote:

Wow, they talk now?! I just thought they spit all over the place a lot.
hahaha. Ok, now seriously though, I'll shut up.

Mine doesn't talk but back in the day it made a few people sing.

Chelsea Lauren wrote:
Wow, they talk now?! I just thought they spit all over the place a lot.
hahaha. Ok, now seriously though, I'll shut up.

Mine speaks to me all the time. It speaks to me about Mayan civilizations, the creation of the universe, and what's on the Playboy chanel late at night. ALL HAIL THE MIGHTY PENIS!

gdsandy wrote:

Mine doesn't talk but back in the day it made a few people sing.

Ahh, music to tame a wild beast..

gdsandy wrote:
Mine doesn't talk but back in the day it made a few people sing.

I fancy your wit.

Dean Solo wrote:
Mine speaks to me all the time. It speaks to me about Mayan civilizations, the creation of the universe, and what's on the Playboy chanel late at night. ALL HAIL THE MIGHTY PENIS!

I just noticed this thread is a sausage fest. *all of a sudden feels scared* haha

gdsandy wrote:

Oooohh Rossi, I just took that remark out of context and am now in danger od incurring the diospleasure of the OP for my own physical state LOL

Hey... Hi! I haven't run into you here in the forums in a while. How are you?

Chelsea Lauren wrote:

I just noticed this thread is a sausage fest. *all of a sudden feels scared* haha

Don't be scared, the penis is your friend.

;D

Chelsea Lauren wrote:

I fancy your wit.

Now I am blushing. But that compliment makes me glad we didn't ski today.  Off to walk the doggies now but people, back to the mass debate on engorged organs please.

Primal Lens wrote:

-Accent- "I`m not the one wearing red silk unnerwear"

lol...

Jphoto wrote:
I had an erection today, if anyone cares.

And I don't even wear underwear.

The only thing standing between you and us is a thin layer of gaberdeen.

Alan from Aavian Prod wrote:
This appears to be an unpopular topic.  Nobody seems to want to post to this thread.

It was actually pretty hilarious til someone got offended

Jonathan R Miller wrote:
well if you need a career change you could definitely do big muscle daddy gay porn but ud totally have to be a bottom boy im guessing from the size of your outline in your underwear shot... not very promising...

You should be put on probation for personal attacks. Seriously, what's wrong with you? Quit attacking people based on your totally-unrelated personal agenda!

Jonathan R Miller wrote:
and its pretty obvious he just started this post because he is a macho straight man with a complex and the only reason he wont have a shot like that in his profile is because he thinks a bunch of gay men would look at it and touch their own erect penis which he needs to realize he isn't even good looking anyways just because he has a nice body... I think he just has something against homos and he only thnks homos have these shots on here... but we all know every 18 and up image of a woman he is zooming in on even if it is artful.... he probably thinks lesbians are sexy and gay guys are gross as well... real men are comfortable in their sexuality... whether gay straight bi or whatever

Oh. My. God.

I can't believe you sat there and spewed that crap into a previously interesting thread.

Why on Earth must you make awful assumptions and attack someone's character in that way? What are you, a male Rosie O'Donnell out to make anything anyone says or does into something homophobic? You're just trying to squeeze your own agenda into this thread and frankly, it's unappreciated! The things you have said have no basis in ANYTHING about this topic or the OP!


I'm usually a person who sets out to offend others but this time, I'm pissed.

Alan from Aavian Prod wrote:
This appears to be an unpopular topic.  Nobody seems to want to post to this thread.

Emily Fine wrote:
It was actually pretty hilarious til someone got offended

Actually, I read this thread at about 6:00AM and it definitely got me chuckling and woke me up!

Alan from Aavian Prod wrote:

Alan from Aavian Prod wrote:
This appears to be an unpopular topic.  Nobody seems to want to post to this thread.

Actually, I read this thread at about 6:00AM and it definitely got me chuckling and woke me up!

I was on it til about 2, and apparently as soon as I left someone started ranting :S

This is the fate of a forum if I'm not here to make a perverted comment!

Emily Fine wrote:

Oh. My. God.

I can't believe you sat there and spewed that crap into a previously interesting thread.

Why on Earth must you make awful assumptions and attack someone's character in that way? What are you, a male Rosie O'Donnell out to make anything anyone says or does into something homophobic? You're just trying to squeeze your own agenda into this thread and frankly, it's unappreciated! The things you have said have no basis in ANYTHING about this topic or the OP!


I'm usually a person who sets out to offend others but this time, I'm pissed.

You know as an aside, I just worked with Thomas this week. I don't think he has anything against gay people (not that it even came up in discussion) and definitely not against the human form.  He was naked for about 75% of the shoot and quite comfortable being so in front of another man.  Most guys with a homophobic attitude generally are skittish at that.  Truly he's just a nice guy who's only been on this site for like a week and he's just trying to figure everything out.

There's nothing wrong with not wanting to do erection shots or simply asking about what is common practice.

It amazes me easy people jump to conclusions and flame on around here!  Sheesh, relax people.

Lillith Leda wrote:
Hahaha

So where are these tented undies then mmmm???

I think they live in the desert! I might have seen one at burningman.

lamar photography wrote:
it is required of some underwear models to "beef up" as you call it ... NOT to erection but theres a alot of area between fully soft in a cold room... to fully hard.

i know one paticular mens underwear company uses prostetic penis's for boys with less then worth while packages.

Wow!  I remember a time when underwear companies didn't there to be so noticeable an outline.

Tomi Hawk wrote:
Well I dunno about the rest a yaz .. but errr, when I jump in the water mine gets .. errr .. wellll .. uhhh, nevermind ..

Your avitar gives me one!

Colford Studios wrote:

Wow!  I remember a time when underwear companies didn't there to be so noticeable an outline.

I know, to think the mens underwear section of the sears cattalog caught my attention at all... I guess a Ken doll's package just doesnt sell in todays market.