Forums > Off-Topic Discussion > SF2: Ess Effin Two > Rate the person portfolio above you

Model

Theresa H

Posts: 64

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

just for fun because im really bored.
rate the person's portfolio above you from 1-10


1 - boy you really need A Lot of work
10 - wow. you got it going on!!

and the rest writes itself.

Take Care,
Theresa

Jan 14 08 11:00 am Link

Model

Katie Ellis

Posts: 276

Chicago, Illinois, US

Theresa H wrote:
just for fun because im really bored.
rate the person's portfolio above you from 1-10


1 - boy you really need A Lot of work
10 - wow. you got it going on!!

and the rest writes itself.

Take Care,
Theresa

I'd say 7. You've got a GREAT look, however in a lot of your images, you give off the same expression. I'd like to see more expressions, and I feel you're capable of doing so! smile

Jan 14 08 11:05 am Link

Photographer

Pete Harasty

Posts: 1165

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

7.5

Jan 14 08 11:06 am Link

Photographer

Eboh Ajeroh

Posts: 1455

Washington, District of Columbia, US

Pete H wrote:
7.5

Pete = 3






























OK...I'm joking.  Your work is nice.  I'd say 7.9

Jan 14 08 11:12 am Link

Photographer

DRP Photography

Posts: 246

Nevada City, California, US

eboh- you get a 10! very well done. very inspirational... DRP

Jan 14 08 11:14 am Link

Photographer

Pete Harasty

Posts: 1165

Las Vegas, Nevada, US

Eboh Ajeroh Photography wrote:

Pete = 3



Eboh  2.9


























OK...I'm joking.  Your work is nice.  I'd say 7.9

Jan 14 08 11:15 am Link

Photographer

Alejandro Llauro

Posts: 884

New York, New York, US

DRP Photography wrote:
eboh- you get a 10! very well done. very inspirational... DRP

DRP great composition amazing locations and very nicely done nudes i say an 8.5

Jan 14 08 11:16 am Link

Photographer

Andrew Attah

Posts: 1699

London, England, United Kingdom

Alejandro Llauro wrote:
DRP great composition amazing locations and very nicely done nudes i say an 8.5

6.5/10

I kinda feel as though the bottom two rows are letting you down.  The stuff at the top is good times, but the bottom two are pulling you down.

Remember, don't rate mine as a fashion/beauty portfolio, as it's not!

www.andrewattah.com

Jan 14 08 11:23 am Link

Photographer

DaVinci Pro Photography

Posts: 264

Orlando, Florida, US

NSE Films wrote:

6.5/10

I kinda feel as though the bottom two rows are letting you down.  The stuff at the top is good times, but the bottom two are pulling you down.

Remember, don't rate mine as a fashion/beauty portfolio, as it's not!

www.andrewattah.com

Overall not bad although I feel your lighting is at times a bit flat

score 6.5/10

Jan 14 08 11:26 am Link

Model

cheryllynnh

Posts: 1815

Flint, Michigan, US

DaVinci Pro Photography wrote:
Overall not bad although I feel your lighting is at times a bit flat

score 6.5/10

DaVinci
8.5
Your lighting rocks and your headshots are killer - beautiful work - wish I lived near you!

https://modelmayhm-4.vo.llnwd.net/d1/photos/080108/20/478426ffb590c_m.jpg

Jan 14 08 11:27 am Link

Photographer

BobbyGPhoto

Posts: 1599

Houston, Texas, US

Cheryllynnh

6

I think if you replaced some of the top 2 rows it would improve your port greatly.  Some of those images appear as sanpshots and are not indicative of your overall look

Jan 14 08 11:31 am Link

Model

Carrie_K

Posts: 10053

Orlando, Florida, US

Bobby G
Your pics on the first couple pages are nice a crisp. The last page has some lesser quality. I'd suggest maybe taking some of the less focused shots out. You have creative and sexy glamour work. I bet you'd do well in other areas as well.

For lack of diveristy, I have to give you a 7. Nice work though.

Jan 14 08 11:38 am Link

Photographer

BobbyGPhoto

Posts: 1599

Houston, Texas, US

Carrie_K wrote:
Bobby G
Your pics on the first couple pages are nice a crisp. The last page has some lesser quality. I'd suggest maybe taking some of the less focused shots out. You have creative and sexy glamour work. I bet you'd do well in other areas as well.

For lack of diveristy, I have to give you a 7. Nice work though.

Which ones are you referring are "less focused"?? so I know which ones to consider...

Jan 14 08 11:42 am Link

Model

Carrie_K

Posts: 10053

Orlando, Florida, US

Bobby G wrote:

Which ones are you referring are "less focused"?? so I know which ones to consider...

PM smile

Jan 14 08 11:44 am Link

Photographer

Anthony B

Posts: 1084

Yardley, Pennsylvania, US

Carrie_K

Great diversity and larger than life expressions = 9.0

Jan 14 08 11:44 am Link

Model

Aleks Hayward

Posts: 227

London, England, United Kingdom

i'd say an 8. It's really diverse. My favourites are the more gothy ones and a few pics in there are gorgeous. Don't like the glamour ones too much with the pink mini but opinions aren't subjective =]

Jan 14 08 11:46 am Link

Photographer

Awesome Photos

Posts: 208

Santa Maria, California, US

I'll give you 6. You have a good future.

Jan 14 08 11:48 am Link

Photographer

Rich Meade

Posts: 1302

Atlanta, Georgia, US

Anthony B wrote:

Your lighting is pretty simple... it doesn't have any thing special to it.
composition wise you are ok, but again, nothing mind blowing.
your model selection leaves a lot to be desired.
and your nudes, come off as very amateur, and show no sophistication.

I recommend experimenting more with your lighting, do some research and study what you like in photography and try to incorporate it into your work.  you have a good technical base, you just need to stretch.

4

Jan 14 08 11:50 am Link

Model

BeatnikDiva

Posts: 14859

Fayetteville, Arkansas, US

https://31.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m8wqunytO81rdo0h6o1_r1_500.jpg

Feb 15 15 06:03 pm Link

Photographer

MesmerEyes Photography

Posts: 3102

Galveston, Texas, US

BeatnikDiva wrote:
https://31.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m8wqunytO81rdo0h6o1_r1_500.jpg

10. A fucking 10!

Feb 15 15 10:15 pm Link

Model

Torttunaattori

Posts: 320

Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland

overall, I like your compositions. 6.5.

Feb 16 15 02:22 am Link

Photographer

nevar

Posts: 14670

Fort Smith, Arkansas, US

Torttu Doris wrote:
overall, I like your compositions. 6.5.

While the photography seems to be proficient, the portfolio is marred with some really amateur post work and a real lack of inspiration.

6.5

Feb 16 15 12:44 pm Link

Photographer

Minx & Fox

Posts: 19067

Palm Springs, California, US

nevar wrote:

While the photography seems to be proficient, the portfolio is marred with some really amateur post work and a real lack of inspiration.

6.5

1 Just awful.   wink


Tee, you know what I think about your work, so I'll let someone else do you. Hehe

Feb 16 15 02:15 pm Link

Photographer

scrymettet

Posts: 33239

Quebec, Quebec, Canada

Burlap Rats wrote:

1 Just awful.   wink


Tee, you know what I think about your work, so I'll let someone else do you. Hehe

muaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
proceed

Feb 16 15 03:58 pm Link

Photographer

nevar

Posts: 14670

Fort Smith, Arkansas, US

scrymettet wrote:

muaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah wrong kinda hole for me
proceed

what the shit is this here shit?

Feb 16 15 05:21 pm Link

Photographer

scrymettet

Posts: 33239

Quebec, Quebec, Canada

nevar wrote:
what the shit is this here shit?

scrymettet wrote:
muaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah wrong kinda hole for me
proceed

dunno who's the mad mod who dropped that thread here.
but it is SF2 : no bewbies,no bacon, no sexual innuendo,no randomness  that have to be corrected.

Nice edit by the way

Feb 16 15 05:28 pm Link

Photographer

nevar

Posts: 14670

Fort Smith, Arkansas, US

did I just try to "like" your comment....

fuck you facebook

Feb 16 15 05:39 pm Link

Photographer

scrymettet

Posts: 33239

Quebec, Quebec, Canada

nevar wrote:
did I just try to "like" your comment....

fuck you facebook

:bows:

plus side, poking fun at Iris is always entertaining

Feb 16 15 05:44 pm Link

Photographer

- Phil H -

Posts: 26552

Mildenhall, England, United Kingdom

scrymettet wrote:

dunno who's the mad mod who dropped that thread here.
but it is SF2 : no bewbies,no bacon, no sexual innuendo,no randomness  that have to be corrected.

Nice edit by the way

As far as I can tell this wasn't dropped here by a Mod, least not anytime recently, it's just a resurrected Zombie, though if it continues attracting "rating" posts it will likely need moving to critique.

Feb 16 15 05:48 pm Link

Photographer

scrymettet

Posts: 33239

Quebec, Quebec, Canada

- Phil H - wrote:
... though if it continues attracting "rating" posts it will likely need moving to critique.

sounds like a plan lol

Feb 16 15 05:50 pm Link

Photographer

Minx & Fox

Posts: 19067

Palm Springs, California, US

I'm just going to ball in a corner over here.

Feb 17 15 08:04 am Link

Photographer

- Phil H -

Posts: 26552

Mildenhall, England, United Kingdom

Burlap Rats wrote:
I'm just going to ball in a corner over here.

*Watches as a large kitten baps the ball in the corner, clean across the room.*

Feb 17 15 09:15 am Link

Photographer

Minx & Fox

Posts: 19067

Palm Springs, California, US

- Phil H - wrote:

*Watches as a large kitten baps the ball in the corner, clean across the room.*

https://i.imgur.com/P5hXEdJ.gif

Feb 17 15 11:27 am Link

Photographer

scrymettet

Posts: 33239

Quebec, Quebec, Canada

Burlap Rats wrote:
I'm just going to ball in a corner over here.

*scratches behind the ears*

Feb 17 15 12:43 pm Link

Photographer

MesmerEyes Photography

Posts: 3102

Galveston, Texas, US

WTF is this. I give diva a 10 for the zombie and people just go on rating ports. Lol.

https://fbcdn-photos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-0/10982393_1558402447772812_1669709762194188830_n.jpg?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=56d7c0409781446da1e3377b85ba7cd6&oe=5548FCC5&__gda__=1431934714_98732440543d26e4db317daa25f1675e

Feb 19 15 04:18 am Link

Photographer

MesmerEyes Photography

Posts: 3102

Galveston, Texas, US

I give the person above me a 15.

Feb 19 15 04:35 am Link

Photographer

CauponaVenereae

Posts: 66

Troup, Texas, US

MesmerEyes Photography wrote:
I give the person above me a 15.

Naw. They suck. I'll givem a five max.

Feb 20 15 01:12 am Link

Photographer

Minx & Fox

Posts: 19067

Palm Springs, California, US

scrymettet wrote:

*scratches behind the ears*

Moo.

Feb 20 15 06:43 am Link

Photographer

scrymettet

Posts: 33239

Quebec, Quebec, Canada

Minx & Fox wrote:

Moo.

would speaking about milking be considered as crass talk ?
*ponders*

Feb 20 15 02:33 pm Link

Photographer

Art Silva

Posts: 10064

Santa Barbara, California, US

i'd say 6 doggy biscuits tongue

Feb 20 15 06:43 pm Link