Photographer

Just Photoz

Posts: 10

Los Angeles, California, US

Fellow photographers how do you feel about models bringing escorts to shoots?

I had no problem with it but after two bad experiences im against it now.  I think its hard when a photographer and a model gets into a zone for the other person to be included in that zone and they wind up messin it up.  Just my personal opinion.  Would you bring an escort to your day job?

Mar 26 11 10:36 am Link

Photographer

B Browder Photo

Posts: 14635

Charleston, South Carolina, US

Post hidden on Mar 26, 2011 11:46 am
Reason: violates rules
Comments:
Do not troll.

Do not hijack.

NOTE: Feeding a troll is highly discouraged. Consider this an early warning.

Mar 26 11 10:38 am Link

Photographer

ontherocks

Posts: 23575

Salem, Oregon, US

nice first post. lol. this is the hot button topic.

we've done like 50 shoots and no problems so far with escorts. we usually put them to work or even shoot them.

Mar 26 11 10:38 am Link

Photographer

Cherrystone

Posts: 37171

Columbus, Ohio, US

B Browder Photo  wrote:
You're new round these parts ain't ya?

lol

Mar 26 11 10:40 am Link

Photographer

Visual Echoes

Posts: 923

Niagara Falls, New York, US

After having a mother complain that I didn't have any reading material for her to sift through while I shot her daughter, I started to specify that escorts need to be able to entertain themselves.

Most models who bring escorts don't model for a living.

Mar 26 11 10:41 am Link

Photographer

Cherrystone

Posts: 37171

Columbus, Ohio, US

Just Photoz wrote:
Fellow photographers how do you feel about models bringing escorts to shoots?

I had no problem with it but after two bad experiences im against it now.  I think its hard when a photographer and a model gets into a zone for the other person to be included in that zone and they wind up messin it up.  Just my personal opinion.  Would you bring an escort to your day job?

No I wouldn't........but to each their own. Live and let live some folks say.

Mar 26 11 10:41 am Link

Photographer

ForeverFotos

Posts: 6662

Indianapolis, Indiana, US

I'm glad you brought up this question. I was wondering what I was going to do for the next three days. tongue

Mar 26 11 10:41 am Link

Photographer

Yan Tan Tethera

Posts: 4185

Biggleswade, England, United Kingdom

B Browder Photo  wrote:

You're new round these parts ain't ya?

Made me smile too.

Mar 26 11 10:42 am Link

Photographer

Yan Tan Tethera

Posts: 4185

Biggleswade, England, United Kingdom

Bruce Hart wrote:
nice first post. lol. this is the hot button topic.

we've done like 50 shoots and no problems so far with escorts. we usually put them to work or even shoot them.

Made me smile too......but in a different way.

Mar 26 11 10:42 am Link

Model

Bon voyage MM

Posts: 9508

Honolulu, Hawaii, US

Visual Echoes wrote:
Most models who bring escorts don't model for a living.

Ya.

Mar 26 11 10:43 am Link

Photographer

Cherrystone

Posts: 37171

Columbus, Ohio, US

White Knight in 9...8...7...6...

Mar 26 11 10:44 am Link

Photographer

Yan Tan Tethera

Posts: 4185

Biggleswade, England, United Kingdom

Cherrystone wrote:
White Knight in 9...8...7...6...

5...4...3....2.....

Mar 26 11 10:45 am Link

Photographer

AVD AlphaDuctions

Posts: 10747

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Mar 26 11 10:47 am Link

Photographer

Mister Monday

Posts: 509

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Here's over 200 threads with 'escorts' in the title.....somebody wake me up if anything new gets said....I'm stoned on cough medicine...

https://www.sendu.me.uk/modelmayhem/?te … rt_order=0

Mar 26 11 10:48 am Link

Photographer

Vector One Photography

Posts: 3722

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US

B Browder Photo  wrote:
You're new round these parts ain't ya?

Lord, foregiveth them for they know not what they do.  But jeeeze, this has got to make 5,000 + 1.

Mar 26 11 10:49 am Link

Photographer

POMERANTS

Posts: 123

Los Angeles, California, US

Im happy that someone finally is willing to talk about this issue.  I constantly see photographers and models alike skirting this very sensitive issue.  I say the HELL with it...lets get it out here in the open and finally deal with it.

Mar 26 11 10:51 am Link

Photographer

B Browder Photo

Posts: 14635

Charleston, South Carolina, US

Just Photoz wrote:
Would you bring an escort to your day job?

No I'm a Chevy man.

Mar 26 11 10:52 am Link

Photographer

punkuate

Posts: 1558

Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom

Aww stop being mean to the newb. Basically, some people don't mind them, some people hate them. Both sides usually feel pretty strongly on the subject, but if you don't want escorts, don't accept them.

Mar 26 11 10:53 am Link

Photographer

sdthjkyf

Posts: 191

Los Angeles, California, US

Photography/modeling is not like any other day job. That's why we do it. I allow models to bring 1 escort. Then it's their decision to show up alone or with someone. I give them guidelines ahead of time so they know.
1) Someone who will behave themselves. Someone who will not disrupt or interefere with the photo shoot or be a distraction to the model.
2) Someone who will be patient because good photo shoots take a while. DOnt' want someone getting impatient and whining "is it almost over." I can ignore it, but it will bother the model, and that shows up in her face.
3) Preferabley another model or a make-up artist. I don't mind a photographer friend only if he/she leaves their camera at home, not in the car.

  I've been lucky not to have any problems with escorts.

Mar 26 11 10:55 am Link

Model

on hiatus m

Posts: 6505

London, England, United Kingdom

SPFOTOLA wrote:
Im happy that someone finally is willing to talk about this issue.  I constantly see photographers and models alike skirting this very sensitive issue.  I say the HELL with it...lets get it out here in the open and finally deal with it.

Dude, this topic has been discussed to death on the forums. Skirting around it? More like charging headfirst swinging a battle axe. tongue

And my sarcasm meter might be off this morning.

punkuate wrote:
Aww stop being mean to the newb. Basically, some people don't mind them, some people hate them. Both sides usually feel pretty strongly on the subject, but if you don't want escorts, don't accept them.

Well said.
I'm a photographer as well; I don't deal with escorts.
I also don't bring an escort with me as a model. I do my homework and asses the situation to make sure it is safe. Having a friend there will not make a dangerous situation safe, it simply allows more than one person to be in danger.

Mar 26 11 10:56 am Link

Photographer

B Browder Photo

Posts: 14635

Charleston, South Carolina, US

Morgan Barbour wrote:
Dude, this topic has been discussed to death on the forums. Skirting around it? More like charging headfirst swinging a battle axe. tongue

I think he was being sarcastic.  Or were you? LOL

Mar 26 11 10:58 am Link

Photographer

punkuate

Posts: 1558

Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom

Morgan Barbour wrote:

Dude, this topic has been discussed to death on the forums. Skirting around it? More like charging headfirst swinging a battle axe. tongue

Dude... sarcasm.

Mar 26 11 10:58 am Link

Model

on hiatus m

Posts: 6505

London, England, United Kingdom

B Browder Photo  wrote:

I think he was being sarcastic.  Or were you? LOL

Ah, re-reading it he might have been.
I'm sleepy this morning. tongue

Mar 26 11 10:59 am Link

Model

on hiatus m

Posts: 6505

London, England, United Kingdom

punkuate wrote:

Dude... sarcasm.

See above. tongue

Mar 26 11 11:00 am Link

Photographer

B Browder Photo

Posts: 14635

Charleston, South Carolina, US

Morgan Barbour wrote:

Ah, re-reading it he might have been.
I'm sleepy this morning. tongue

Thats ok, I agree though this really should be discussed.  LOL

Mar 26 11 11:00 am Link

Photographer

Solas

Posts: 10390

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

I hate it, I mean seriously.

Drive a real car already.

Mar 26 11 11:01 am Link

Photographer

Solas

Posts: 10390

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

big_smile

Mar 26 11 11:01 am Link

Model

on hiatus m

Posts: 6505

London, England, United Kingdom

B Browder Photo  wrote:

Thats ok, I agree though this really should be discussed.  LOL

Forserious.
After that I vote we discuss how height means nothing to be a fashion model as long as you want it bad enough, and how Canon is obviously superior to Nikon. cool lol

Mar 26 11 11:01 am Link

Photographer

J Vida

Posts: 4059

Toledo, Ohio, US

https://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x243/toledojose/funny-dog-pictures-popcorn-gotz.jpg

Mar 26 11 11:01 am Link

Photographer

POMERANTS

Posts: 123

Los Angeles, California, US

Morgan Barbour wrote:

Forserious.
After that I vote we discuss how height means nothing to be a fashion model as long as you want it bad enough, and how Canon is obviously superior to Nikon. cool lol

Dude?  Really?  We all know Nikon is superior to Canon.  But I'm willing to discuss this sensitive issue as well.

Mar 26 11 11:03 am Link

Model

on hiatus m

Posts: 6505

London, England, United Kingdom

SPFOTOLA wrote:
Dude?  Really?  We all know Nikon is superior to Canon.  But I'm willing to discuss this sensitive issue as well.

But...but...but...
Your mother.


Oh snap. I went there! yikes tongue
(And sorry for completely misinterpreting your post earlier. ^^; )

Mar 26 11 11:10 am Link

Photographer

White Lace Studios

Posts: 1719

Mesa, Arizona, US

SPFOTOLA wrote:
Im happy that someone finally is willing to talk about this issue.  I constantly see photographers and models alike skirting this very sensitive issue.  I say the HELL with it...lets get it out here in the open and finally deal with it.

Finally deal with what? People aren't skirting the escort issue. just been discussed 1000 times.

This will end either one of two ways
1. you'll see dead horse and white knight gifs all over the place with a link to search results of the 1000 other escort threads.

2. it will end badly, with ensuing dick measuring, and an eventual thread lock

Lest I not disappoint, here is one such link, with my reasons I don’t allow escorts
https://www.modelmayhem.com/po.php?thre … st14800444

Bottom line – establish your policy. No one can tell you which is right or wrong. Focus on what is right for you. Others will do the same.

Edit: Wait - you were being scarastic - right? smile

Mar 26 11 11:15 am Link

Photographer

Patrick Walberg

Posts: 45208

San Juan Bautista, California, US

"Escorts" that pay large sums of money for their pictures are welcome in front of my camera any time!  wink  I don't care what they do for a living if the money is good.  I don't pay for escorts and never will.  Since Craigslist pulled their adult ads, I have not gotten as many of these requests though.

Oh wait!  You are talking about the car?  Yea, I've had a couple Ford Escorts before.  Put 100k on my first one then totaled it out by rolling it!  I'm lucky to be alive, then the second one I burned the engine up ... so have not had much luck with them.

Huh?  You don't mean "escorts" but you mean chaperones that come with minor aged models?  Yes, I have no problem with adults (parents) accompanying their child to photo shoots.  In fact they are very welcomed!

Not that kind of chaperone?  But some sort of protection?  Yes, I know I'm such a loveable nice guy that I need protection.  So I do have several folks like make up artists, hair, grips, and other assistants to help out on a shoot.  They protect me from bad photo shoots.  We have good photo shoots working together! wink

My rule is "No uninvited guests!"   If you want to have someone I don't know attend, then you should introduce us in advance and let me know why that person should be attending.  I have no problem with friends that we both know being at shoots.

"Escorts" is a bad, filthy, terrible word on the forums!  Either you are an invited guest OF BOTH the model and photographer OR you don't belong there.   Anyone else is an univited guest there for the WRONG reasons!  Get it?

Mar 26 11 11:16 am Link

Photographer

Mark in MTL

Posts: 1053

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

punkuate wrote:
Aww stop being mean to the newb. Basically, some people don't mind them, some people hate them. Both sides usually feel pretty strongly on the subject, but if you don't want escorts, don't accept them.

Yeah, I don't see why it has to be a 100% yes or no situation.

A pro shoot at a studio + other staff present: NO, not needed.

GWC shooting you nekkid in his basement "studio" at his house, no one else present. Yeah probably.

Mar 26 11 11:26 am Link

Photographer

Just Photoz

Posts: 10

Los Angeles, California, US

B Browder Photo  wrote:

No I'm a Chevy man.

lol me 2

Mar 26 11 11:28 am Link

Body Painter

Extreme Body Art

Posts: 4938

South Jordan, Utah, US

If you wish to believe escorts keeps the model safe because the "possibility" of finding a rapist or what have you, here are the places you need to have an escort because of the "possibility" of being raped or assaulted.

A)     To the Bathroom (Which most women go in packs anyway, right?) http://www.nytimes.com/1997/08/10/nyreg … quare.html

B)      To a store (Wal-Mart, Mall, etc...) http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,348409,00.html

C)      To a Gym http://www.dailypennsylvanian.com/node/30248

D)     To a Club http://www.carolinalive.com/news/story.aspx?id=500775

E)      Jogging http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25625353/

F)      To Work http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1 … 985C563909

G)     To a Bank http://www.emirates247.com/news/emirate … 9-1.272398

H)     The Library http://www2.tbo.com/content/2010/aug/30 … -breaking/

The list could actually go on. There is always a chance of something that MIGHT happen somewhere with whatever activity you choose to do; even then, a true psycho will just kill your escort too. There are rapists and murderers that don't care if someone is there, he would just kill them too. So enough with the fear mongering.

Of course, sometimes it has nothing to do with safety. It has to do with, helping the model in and out of wardrobe, touching up make up, readjusting or fixing the model's hair.  Photographers have no problems with people being at a shoot that have business being there (A make-up artist, hair stylist, clothing designer, etc).

Read these and if you still need an escort.. work with those that allow them.. otherwise.. lose the "mean world syndrome"
Safety In Internet Modeling, By James Glendinning/ SilverLight Esoterica Photography

What is Due Diligence in the Internet Modeling and Photography Environment?, By Curt @ photoworks.ws

Mar 26 11 11:28 am Link

Photographer

Abbitt Photography

Posts: 13564

Washington, Utah, US

I don't have a policy against escorts.  My experiences with them have been mixed.

Overall though, I don't like them for the following reasons:

1. More liability exposure for me.
2. More crowding in my small home studio
3. Greatly increased risk of theft.
4. They often feel they need to give their opinions to the detriment of the shoot
5. There are now 2 people instead of one that need to stick to their commitment for the shoot to happen, so the risk of the model bailing is increased.
6. If a model feels I'm a threat to her, I'd rather not work with her at all.
7.  With nude shoots, while a newer model might like the idea of not being alone with the photographer, when actually at the shoot, a bystander may make the model less comfortable.

Mar 26 11 11:29 am Link

Body Painter

Extreme Body Art

Posts: 4938

South Jordan, Utah, US

Mark in MTL wrote:

Yeah, I don't see why it has to be a 100% yes or no situation.

A pro shoot at a studio + other staff present: NO, not needed.

GWC shooting you nekkid in his basement "studio" at his house, no one else present. Yeah probably.

Not really, an escort is NEVER needed.. it's only wanted.
It's the lazy way out of "I don't want to check this guy out so I will bring someone along".

Anyway
Like in my earlier post... You could shoot in a "GWC"'s basement and if he really wanted to kill or rape you.. your escort is not going to stop him.. just another person to take out or add to the body count.

It's better not to even do the shoot at all if you feel you need someone there.

Mar 26 11 11:34 am Link

Photographer

Kevin Connery

Posts: 17824

El Segundo, California, US

Moderator Warning!

B Browder Photo  wrote:
You're new round these parts ain't ya?

Yes.

That means YOU are responsible for not violating the rules even more than they are.

Respond to the ideas being expressed, not the person expressing them.

Please, no trolling. This is not the right place to antagonize, provoke, inflame, or cause controversy. And don't feed the trolls, because responding in kind only makes things worse.

Stay on topic. Do not hijack the thread.

Everyone starts from somewhere. Be nice and help the newbies, not bash them.

Sexual harassment, bullying, personal attacks and other boorish behavior are not tolerated.

Responding to a post in a hijacking fashion is disruptive, and you have been here long enough to know better.

Mocking a new member because they are new is against the rules, and you have been here long enough to know better.

If you wanted to point out that the topic has been discussed, there are/were many ways to do that without being rude. In fact, if people didn't go out of their way to hijack legitimate threads, there would be far fewer trainwrecks and locked threads. Unless you are trying to derail threads, do not behave like this.

Mar 26 11 11:43 am Link

Photographer

punkuate

Posts: 1558

Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom

Mark in MTL wrote:
GWC shooting you nekkid in his basement "studio" at his house, no one else present. Yeah probably.

Or they could just choose not to shoot with GWCs?

I've had models want to bring an escort, I always wonder what danger they think I could pose to them.

Mar 26 11 11:48 am Link