Kelly Anne-Marie wrote:
I offered to sign one of them via fax but that photog. said he didn't like getting it signed via fax.

So the release is so important that he doesn't trust it to be signed and faxed. But not important enough that he would have remembered to have it signed, in person, in the first place?

Riiiight.

I think your photographer wants to see your pretty face again.

Charger Photography wrote:

No, that is not the reason... sent me a PM and I'll tell you what the deal is... I'm the photographer the OP is talking about....

I was being playful. Thanks for ruining the fun lol.

Michael Pandolfo wrote:

I was being playful. Thanks for ruining the fun lol.

Oh my bad !!!! LOL...

Kelly Anne-Marie wrote:

No,I am wondering...that's all.

Kelly... I told you why... I believe about a month ago.. I don't see the need of you to come here and ask something I already explained to you...

Kelly Anne-Marie wrote:

When,no you didn't.
Please send a message...o.k.?

I did when you asked me why I didn't have any of your pics in my port.. and when you told me you were willing to sign a release and fax back to me... read your PMs.... must be easy to find... you sent it to me.

Kelly Anne-Marie wrote:

huh?...If you are talking about messages in MM,I don't keep messages if its old and not going to use it.

okay... fine then... I'm not going to answer here anymore... i don't want to get caught in one of your train wreck threads... I don't want to get in trouble and go to the brig.

Michael Pandolfo wrote:
OK, so I was wrong. It doesn't sound like he's wanting to meet up any time soon lol.

LOL.... I took those pics almost 2 years ago... I just can't believe after I explained to her about a month ago... and now she starts a thread about it.

Kelly Anne-Marie wrote:

Unsure what the prob. is, now I'm dealing with more then I thought...Hopefully he will re P.M. me. He's nice to me...so I don't know what,he ever told me to tell him know if I wanted to shoot.

You remember me saying no to the faxed release... but you don't remember my reasons... selective memory ??

Charger Photography wrote:

LOL.... I took those pics almost 2 years ago... I just can't believe after I explained to her about a month ago... and now she starts a thread about it.

The plot is definitely thickening...but was I correct in my earlier statement?

Kelly Anne-Marie wrote:

Jose!!!...I am not talking about the shoot with you...hello???

You realize you are outing Jose...

Kelly Anne-Marie wrote:

I sent you a P.M....Really,This wasn't about you...but now kinda is.
Why are you paranoid?...relax.

If its a recurring instance, maybe you need to look at the common denominator...

Kelly Anne-Marie wrote:

huh?...If you are talking about messages in MM,I don't keep messages if its old and not going to use it.

Go to his profile, click the icon that says message history, youll see everthing youve ever said to each other, even if you deleted it

Laura UnBound wrote:

Go to his profile, click the icon that says message history, youll see everthing youve ever said to each other, even if you deleted it

+1

Kelly Anne-Marie wrote:
Because I asked you not to use ONE photo??? One my puss is showing...thats crazy.
But o.k.

You said you were leaving.

So now you8 are trying to turn the tables and make him the bad guy?

Kelly Anne-Marie wrote:

Because I asked you not to use ONE photo??? One my puss is showing...thats crazy.
But o.k.

Really ???? is not even about that...
You really want me to post here so the whole world can see.. what is my reason to not get a release signed by you almost 2 years after the date I took the pics?

Charger Photography wrote:

Really ???? is not even about that...
You really want me to post here so the whole world can see.. what is my reason to not get a release signed by you almost 2 years after the date I took the pics?

I do

Kelly Anne-Marie wrote:
Yes,please or send a P.M to me...Since it's really bothering you.

That's all I see and the fact you think I will not like what ever else you use.,so what. I just don't like that one 'cause that's not what it suppose to of been.

I'm not going to use any pics... and that one showing your "lady part" i only re touched it because was one of the ones you picked...

Kelly Anne-Marie wrote:

True,but not for internet usage...just for me.
So,I guess what I mean is I don't like it for port usage.

If your shoot was TF, then you don't really get to make those demands.

What's the point of shooting something that the photographer is not allowed to use?  Unless you paid him.

Charger Photography wrote:

Really ???? is not even about that...
You really want me to post here so the whole world can see.. what is my reason to not get a release signed by you almost 2 years after the date I took the pics?

Yes...curious minds want to know

Kelly Anne-Marie wrote:

I didn't demand anything...I just asked.
And as far as I know that image was a mistake,but unsure.

The image was a mistake, yet you asked him to finish it FOR YOU to use.

Oh, I see.  So, it's fair for you to use, but not for him.   Sounds legit.