Forums > Critique > Fun and Games > Pro, amateur or GWPW?

Photographer

Apollo Photos

Posts: 20

San Diego, California, US

I'd love to get your opinion.

Feb 24 14 11:19 am Link

Photographer

erics_Toronto_GTA

Posts: 5176

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Want to hear.
Thanks.

Feb 24 14 11:03 pm Link

Photographer

Shervivor

Posts: 1408

Falls Church, Virginia, US

Do me wink

Feb 27 14 10:32 am Link

Photographer

David Pollack

Posts: 1933

Wilmington, Delaware, US

J Millman Photography wrote:
Me

seriously? 10 years?

GWPW

Feb 27 14 09:33 pm Link

Photographer

David Pollack

Posts: 1933

Wilmington, Delaware, US

Henry Westheim wrote:
I'd like to know.  Cheers!

amateur

Feb 27 14 09:33 pm Link

Photographer

David Pollack

Posts: 1933

Wilmington, Delaware, US

Apollo Photos wrote:
I'd love to get your opinion.

pw

Feb 27 14 09:34 pm Link

Photographer

David Pollack

Posts: 1933

Wilmington, Delaware, US

Eric SUN wrote:
Want to hear.
Thanks.

I did not even waste my time looking at your "portfolio"  the big sword on your profile page says it all.

I don't think I would want the camera you used holding my papers from blowing around.

Feb 27 14 09:37 pm Link

Photographer

David Pollack

Posts: 1933

Wilmington, Delaware, US

Shervivor wrote:
Do me wink

you don't need me, you have all those fabulous MM "awards" to tell you just how good you are.

Feb 27 14 09:40 pm Link

Photographer

EnlightendedPhotography

Posts: 828

Eugene, Oregon, US

This should be fun, might even get a new name....

Feb 27 14 09:49 pm Link

Model

Celine Sophia

Posts: 503

Santa Barbara, California, US

If your still going, me next please

Feb 28 14 03:29 am Link

Photographer

David Pollack

Posts: 1933

Wilmington, Delaware, US

EnlightendedPhotography wrote:
This should be fun, might even get a new name....

wake me up when it is time to say something

Feb 28 14 07:42 am Link

Photographer

EnlightendedPhotography

Posts: 828

Eugene, Oregon, US

lol.....thanks for taking the time

Feb 28 14 09:35 am Link

Photographer

Open Eyes

Posts: 109

Seattle, Washington, US

I'm almost scared to ask but getting feedback is the best way to learn.

Mar 02 14 02:50 am Link

Photographer

David Pollack

Posts: 1933

Wilmington, Delaware, US

Open Eyes wrote:
I'm almost scared to ask but getting feedback is the best way to learn.

oh come on, did you just happen to have the giant sword lying around. (doesn't everybody have a giant sword lying around?)

stop, please, really. open your eyes.

smash your camera right now, use the parts for some art project

Mar 03 14 02:30 pm Link

Photographer

JAE

Posts: 2207

West Chester, Pennsylvania, US

Interested.

Mar 04 14 06:36 pm Link

Photographer

erics_Toronto_GTA

Posts: 5176

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

David Pollack wrote:

I did not even waste my time looking at your "portfolio"  the big sword on your profile page says it all.

I don't think I would want the camera you used holding my papers from blowing around.

Wow,a BIG guy with paperweight.Nice.
Thank you for telling me that.

Mar 05 14 11:11 pm Link

Photographer

Mr HOGs Poetry

Posts: 176

Weaverville, North Carolina, US

You're still doing this! Commendable, it's a lonely job trying to uphold quality standards in model photography.

I hope my profile and port amuses you, best wishes.

Mar 06 14 03:59 am Link

Photographer

David Pollack

Posts: 1933

Wilmington, Delaware, US

JAE wrote:
Interested.

I don't understand. You like looking at naked women (I iuse the work naked intentionally rather than nude), we can all tell from your photos. You can take a decent clean image better than 99.99% of mm. What is it that you are looking for? You want validation, you got plenty from awards from MM "POTD" for this. 

Is this just a hobby? Great you get the coveted amateur rating. Done. 

Trying to be a professional? Work on it, the possibility clearly exists.

GWC

Mar 06 14 10:40 am Link

Photographer

David Pollack

Posts: 1933

Wilmington, Delaware, US

Mr HOGs Poetry wrote:
You're still doing this! Commendable, it's a lonely job trying to uphold quality standards in model photography.

I hope my profile and port amuses you, best wishes.

WOW I never know the photographer in Dinner for Schmuck was looked up to as a role model. Good job.

gwpw

Mar 06 14 10:43 am Link

Photographer

Shervivor

Posts: 1408

Falls Church, Virginia, US

David Pollack wrote:
you don't need me, you have all those fabulous MM "awards" to tell you just how good you are.

LOL. A Pulitzer might tell me I am good. The MM awards are just for fun, and I assume that puts me in the CWPW category because would a Pulitzer winner even be wasting time here?

Mar 11 14 08:53 am Link

Photographer

David Pollack

Posts: 1933

Wilmington, Delaware, US

Shervivor wrote:

LOL. A Pulitzer might tell me I am good. The MM awards are just for fun, and I assume that puts me in the CWPW category because would a Pulitzer winner even be wasting time here?

Look at your own "lists", you know what better photos look like, you can see better lighting, design, styling, technique.

Mar 23 14 08:48 am Link

Photographer

Glamour by Glenn

Posts: 1033

Chattanooga, Tennessee, US

You've had a year of relief from this thread. We miss you David.

Mar 26 15 12:32 am Link

Photographer

_HamisH_

Posts: 17

London, England, United Kingdom

Here! Started using a camera about a year and a half ago

Mar 26 15 07:24 am Link

Photographer

PPP Photo

Posts: 204

Naples, Campania, Italy

That's a funny thread... my turn to get killed

Mar 27 15 10:34 am Link

Photographer

eveliu

Posts: 16

Minneapolis, Minnesota, US

Pretty sure my pictures look really similar as of now but I would still like feedback!

Jun 27 15 05:42 am Link

Model

Kellyo2011

Posts: 39

Tampa, Florida, US

Pro

Jul 27 15 08:02 am Link