JONATHAN RICHARD wrote:

You may be on to something......???

Man, that is rough, she's really rockin' the trailer park look here!

K I C K H A M wrote:
Substance abuse problems are just hilarious, am-i-rite?

This is just me, appreciating the sarcasm.

AHouston wrote:

Koryn wrote:

JONATHAN RICHARD wrote:
You may be on to something......???

I think her hand is foreshortened, or something. Looks weird.

Leave Britney alone

I am sure a good retoucher could peel off a dozen years.. I am not sure about the hand..Looks like it is some one elses...

Locutus wrote:
What a low life, shitty thing to do.

Sure is easy to pick on someone when they aint there, in person, to defend themselves.
( begin sarcasm)
"Boy oh boy the internet!! WEEEE! Hey, we can be mean to people and think we're cool! Come on everyone join me in being a true asshole! We can pretend we're back in grade-school and gang up on people! Then brag about it to our other little friends.."(end sarcasm)

Welcome to art. We criticize appearances.

Alabaster Crowley wrote:

Welcome to art. We criticize appearances.

I like to think most artists take an approach superior to the 8th grade lunchroom, but I've been wrong before.

Alabaster Crowley wrote:

Welcome to art. We criticize appearances.

Some sure do, and not just in "ART"
And i'll bet you'll find those who do it,here, under the excuse of "ART" do it elsewhere under some other excuse as well.
Sometimes people just feel better about their shabby selves, when they pick on others.
It's a shame.

K I C K H A M wrote:
I like to think most artists take an approach superior to the 8th grade lunchroom, but I've been wrong before.

If you're a celebrity or model, it's part of your job to look good. If you're not doing that, you're going to get comments.

Some of us are just more blunt.

K I C K H A M wrote:
I like to think most artists take an approach superior to the 8th grade lunchroom, but I've been wrong before.

I like the way you think, MS. KICKHAM.

Alabaster Crowley wrote:

If you're a celebrity or model, it's part of your job to look good. If you're not doing that, you're going to get comments.

Some of us are just more blunt.

I understand that.

It doesn't mean those comments are going to be free from criticism.

PR Zone wrote:
Conversation kicked off earlier on Facebook, with a bunch of posting 'then and now' shots of models/actors etc

Criteria?

The BIGGEST fall off in looks, in the shortest possible time, by 'life choices alone'

For me, this MUST be a winner, but what do the MM clan think?




Link, in case you want to copy/paste...

http://s11.postimg.org/hmtquvn8j/image.jpg

Here's a candid shot from 5 days ago.
She doesn't look so bad.